Skip to main content

Your next dream car: McLaren’s 650S hits the web before official Geneva debut – UPDATE

The pictures are grainy and the video is hand-held and uninspiring but the vehicle they portray is nothing shy of awe-inspiring.

No, I don’t mean for its looks – which, if I am quite honest, are not as striking as I was hoping they’d be – but rather for its guaranteed driving perfection.

Enough with my thoughts, though, let’s get to the important bits. The McLaren 650S will be the British supercar maker’s mid-level car, placed carefully between the MP4-12C and the P1 hypercar.

“The 650S badge designation refers to the power output – 650PS (641 horsepower), – of the unique British-built McLaren M838T twin turbo V8 engine. ‘S’ stands for ‘Sport’, underlining the focus and developments made to handling, transmission, drivability and engagement,” McLaren said in a press release. “Performance figures will be confirmed ahead of the Geneva Show but will improve on the already rapid 12C which continues on sale.”

We do know from the video that the 650S’ transmission offer faster shifts, which adds more “flare” on downshifts, improving driving enjoyment. Improved, too, is steering feel and response. Funny, we didn’t know it could get better than the 12C. That’s like being told Genesis Rodriguez gets more beautiful or Santa gets more generous; it’s almost mind-boggling.

We’ll be watching all of the Internet’s tubes closely for any more McLaren 650S details. I am sure more will leak before the 2014 Geneva Motor Show next month. Be sure to check back often for more details.

Update: We added official engine specs and photos from McLaren.

Nick Jaynes
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Nick Jaynes is the Automotive Editor for Digital Trends. He developed a passion for writing about cars working his way…
Could Chinese cars save us from high EV prices?
BYD Han

The electric vehicle market is seriously heating up, with more great options being released every few months. But while there are more and more excellent electric vehicle options available, it’s still hard to find a great EV that doesn’t cost at least $40,000 or so.

But there could be a solution to that -- or at least a way to ease the problem. How? High-quality, low-cost Chinese EVs.
Competition
At face value, the solution to lowering EV prices is simple -- and involves a combination of the cost of new tech decreasing over time, while automakers release more and more models, increasing competition and pushing companies to create better-value vehicles.

Read more
Tesla Cybertruck: everything we know
Tesla's Cybertruck.

The Tesla Cybertruck is Tesla's take on an electric truck, and boy has it had a controversial first few years. The truck was first announced back in 2019 -- complete with broken window... during a demo showing how strong the windows were supposed to be. When the truck finally started rolling out to customers in 2023, it did so very slowly -- and was soon subject of a recall.

We're now almost a year into Cybertrucks on the streets, and if you live in a major U.S. city, it's entirely possible that you've seen one in the flesh. If you have, you know that it's completely unlike anything else on the road right now, and represents Tesla's vision of the future of personal transportation.

Read more
BMW’s EVs trace their roots to this innovative 1972 prototype
BMW 1602 Electric.

In the 1960s, when the electric car looked more like a far-fetched science fair experiment than a relatively convenient way of moving people and goods, investing in electrification made little sense. And yet, it's the early, rudimentary prototypes that paved the road for the current crop of EVs. For example, BMW displayed a stunning amount of foresight when it built a pair of electric 1602s and tested them during a major sporting event.

BMW launched this ambitious project in 1969 and planned to have a running prototype ready in time for the 1972 Olympic Games, which were set to take place in its hometown of Munich, Germany. Developing an electric car from scratch was ruled out for cost reasons.

Read more