Skip to main content

IIHS says pickup trucks have bad headlights too

When it comes to headlights, pickup trucks perform poorly — as do other vehicle categories — according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS). Over the past few months, the organization has criticized the performance of headlights after conducting a series of group tests.

As with previous tests involving cars and crossovers, the IIHS found the majority of new pickup trucks to have inadequate lighting. All four “small” pickup trucks in its group test received the lowest rating of “poor,” while only one “large” truck, the Honda Ridgeline, received the top rating of “good.” Note that the Ridgeline and all trucks in the “small” category are generally considered midsize trucks, while all other trucks tested are full-size models.

Recommended Videos

The IIHS tested 11 trucks with 23 possible headlight combinations. The Ridgeline was the only bright spot (no pun intended), and only performed well with the headlight system available on the RTL-E and Black Edition trim levels. This included LED projector low beams and high-beam assist, which automatically switches the high beams on when no other vehicles are present.

Read more: Mercedes-Benz X-Class concept previews upcoming pickup truck

The GMC Sierra earned an “acceptable” rating with headlights available on certain trim levels. Both Nissan Titan headlight systems received a “marginal” rating, as did certain Ram 1500 systems. Every other truck in the test received a “poor” rating. The IIHS rates headlights by measuring projection over a straightaway and left and righthand curves, as well as the level of glare for oncoming drivers.

Among the trucks rated “poor” was the Ford F-150, which is the best-selling vehicle in the U.S. The IIHS found both base halogen and optional LED lighting systems to be inadequate, with the LED system producing “unacceptable” levels of glare. The headlights with the worst level of visibility belonged to the Chevrolet Colorado. The Chevy’s base halogen low beams could only illuminate up to 123 feet on the right side of the straightway, compared to 358 feet for the Ridgeline’s LED low beams.

Automakers will have to improve their performance if they want to continue getting top ratings from the IIHS. Beginning with the 2017 model year, vehicles will need headlights rated “good” or “acceptable” to receive the organization’s highest rating, Top Safety Pick+.

Stephen Edelstein
Stephen is a freelance automotive journalist covering all things cars. He likes anything with four wheels, from classic cars…
This week in EV tech: Audi exemplifies auto industry’s EV holding pattern
Close-up of 2025 Audi SQ5 grille, headlight, and badge.

The road to the future runs through the present, and it’s not a straight line. This week, we’re focusing on how Audi is negotiating the twists and turns on the way to an electrified future. EVs are here to stay at Audi, but a gasoline crossover SUV is still the automaker’s bestselling model, and it’s not ready to risk those sales just yet. That’s why the 2025 Audi Q5 received a top-to-bottom overhaul for this model year, bringing its tech features and styling up to date without altering the what has proven to be a very popular package. By maintaining parallel lineups of electric and internal-combustion cars, Audi hopes to give customers more choices. But that doesn’t completely level the playing field. The new Q5 may have yesterday’s powertrain, but Audi isn’t holding back on tech. It features the same electrical architecture, operating system, and three-screen dashboard display as the latest Audi EVs, like the Q6 e-tron. So aside from a little engine noise, there’s little difference in what you can see and interact with from the driver’s seat. It’s not just the infotainment systems. The Q5 and Q6 e-tron are close in size, with similar space for passengers across their two rows of seats. The Q6 e-tron has a bit more cargo space, but not as much as you’d think given the lack of a bulky engine, transmission, and driveshafts. The two SUVs also have similar styling but, having now driven both, we can say that the Q5 is the more pleasant of the two.

More than a difference of powertrain tech

Read more
Take a peek inside the factory making tomorrow’s ride
A Zoox robotaxi.

Amazon-owned Zoox has opened its first facility producing fully autonomous robotaxis. 

A video (above) released by the California-based company offers a peek inside the factory, which, when it reaches full capacity, could roll out as many as 10,000 autonomous vehicles per year.

Read more
The week in EV tech: 900 miles, 12 minutes—EV charging just hit warp speed
byd 900 miles 12 minutes seal

Welcome to Digital Trends’ weekly recap of the revolutionary technology powering, connecting, and now driving next-gen electric vehicles. 
If you’re hesitant about electric vehicles (EV), it’s likely that your top concerns include how far you can drive in a single charge, how long it takes to charge the battery, and how much this advanced tech will cost you. And you're not alone.
According to Deloitte’s 2025 Global Automotive Consumer Study, nearly half of U.S. consumers (49%) still say that available battery driving range is their biggest worry about EVs. That’s followed closely by the time required to charge (46%) and the lingering cost premium (44%) associated with battery electric vehicles.
But that narrative may finally be flipping. Just this past week, two developments showcase how much EV technology has evolved over the past decade: China’s BYD is breaking new grounds on just how far you can drive an EV on a single 12-minute charge. Meanwhile, the Nissan Leaf, seen as the first mass-market EV in 2010, is getting an impressive upgrade even as it remains one of the most affordable options on the market.

BYD’s bold battery bet
Chinese auto giant BYD, already the world’s top-selling EV manufacturer, may have just redrawn the limits of battery performance. According to Chinese media, and other reports, the company is testing a new solid-state battery that can add 900 miles of range in just 12 minutes of charging.
Let that sink in. That’s nearly four times the range of many current EVs—enough to drive from New York to Chicago —and charging that’s as fast as a coffee stop.

Read more