Skip to main content

Why ‘Free Piston’ engines could power your next plug-in hybrid

An engine with no crankshaft, where the pistons float on air? It’s not a dream; it’s a free piston engine and it might be the next major advance in car tech.

When we think of automotive technology of the future, we usually think of alternative fuels, whether its hydrogen or electric power from futuristic batteries. It turns out, the future might actually be a new form of internal combustion: the ‘free piston’ engine.

This technology radically reshapes engines, replacing the crankshaft that normally transfers power from the pistons with a compression chamber and a turbo impeller. Free piston engines hold out the potential of radically improved efficiency. Prototype free piston engines are already 50 to 60 percent more efficient than any engine currently in production – and there is the potential for much more.

How does it work?

A free piston has most of the same components as any internal combustion engine. The key difference is how it captures the power of combustion.

In a standard engine, fuel and air are injected into the compression chamber and ignited. This combustion pushes down on the piston, which is connected to the crankshaft. In cars, the energy of the rotating crankshaft is run through a transmission and out to the drive wheels.

 

In a free piston engine, combustion happens the same way, but there is no crankshaft. On the face of it, this seems crazy, as the pistons are just left rattling around in their cylinders. But this is actually a stroke – yes, I intended that pun – of genius. By horizontally opposing two cylinders and detonating them simultaneously, the pistons compress the air between them. This air is piped through a compressor that looks a great deal like a turbocharger.

While it is technically possible to drive an axle directly from this turbine, in practice this turbine is put to its best use driving an electrical generator.

The idea for such an engine has been around since 1807, but the challenges of getting the pistons to fire and move simultaneously have prevented designers from taking full advantage of the free piston engine … until now.

The advantages

So, with those challenges, why even bother? Well, it all has to do with efficiency. In a standard internal combustion engine, a great deal of the power is lost as heat and vibration. Modern gasoline engines can convert only 18 to 25 percent of the potential energy of the fuel they burn into usable energy. The most efficient gasoline engines can momentarily achieve as much as 35 percent, but even then only under ideal conditions.

In a standard internal combustion engine, a great deal of the power is lost as heat and vibration.

The lack of a crankshaft in the free piston system means there are none of the constant momentum changes that create the vibration and friction that foul efficiency. These advantages have been apparent for two centuries, but with the precision of modern technology there is another: variable compression ratios.

With a crankshaft the size of the combustion chamber, the length of the piston’s movement is fixed. In modern, experimental free piston engines, the size of the chamber and length of the power stroke can be varied on the fly, changing from revolution to revolution, with the engine management unit tailoring the size of the combustion chamber to the ideal fuel air mixture.

Additionally, this variability should allow free piston engines to run on anything from hydrogen to natural gas. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised if one of these engines would run on single malt scotch.

All of these qualities make the free piston engine ideal as an onboard generator, the role in which it may revolutionize powertrain design.

Seriously, when can I get one?

So far, two prototype free piston engines are in the works. The first, unsurprisingly, comes from German scientists/dark magicians at the German Aerospace Center (DLR).

Their prototype, dubbed the “Freikolbenlineargenerator,” which I am not sure is proof that Germans have a sense of humor or not, is still in the early stages of development. Yet despite this, it promises to deliver the sort of performance other powertrain engineers can only dream of.

Toyota’s engine would be capable of generating 15 horsepower from a package eight inches around and two feet long.

The Freikolbenlineargenerator uses cylinders that face each other. This piston orientation allows it to be even more compact than typical free piston engines. This makes it perfect for use as a range extender.

Take for example, the Chevy Volt. It has batteries and is capable of running solely on electricity. But when the batteries go flat, it has a 1.4-liter gas engine that can recharge them and propel the car itself above 65 mph. This works well, but unfortunately even small displacement gas engines are bulky, heavy, and expensive.

The Freikolbenlineargenerator can accomplish the same job, while being small enough to mount beneath the floor of a car, which saves space for other things like kale, let’s say.

But a miracle engine on the workbench of a Teutonic mad scientist is a long way from actual production, right?

Well, Toyota is on board, too. This summer, the massive Japanese automaker announced its own free piston engine or ‘linear generator.’ The Toyota version uses a single cylinder rather than an opposed pair, and is capable of 42 percent thermal efficiency under constant operating conditions. That’s better than any production engine is capable of achieving – even momentarily, under optimal conditions.

Toyota’s engine would be capable of generating 15 horsepower from a package eight inches around and two feet long. Two of these would likely be more than enough to recharge the batteries in a modern range-extended vehicle with huge space and energy savings. The German technology is amazing, but Toyota’s engine could be in the Prius before long.

Conclusion

Pure electric – or possibly hydrogen – is still almost certainly the long-term future energy source for cars. However, neither of those technologies is quite ready. Electric comes close, but is still far too expensive for most American consumers, to say nothing of literally billions of Chinese and Indian consumers who aspire to car ownership.

Free piston engines may be a critical bridge technology that can dramatically improve efficiency of internal combustion. They may also have a longer lifespan than traditional forms of internal combustion, thanks to their ability to burn nearly anything flammable … I’m looking at you, oily rags.

If industry giants like Toyota decide to throw their weight behind the technology, it could be in production cars very soon. Let’s hope.

Peter Braun
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Peter is a freelance contributor to Digital Trends and almost a lawyer. He has loved thinking, writing and talking about cars…
The week in EV tech: From sky-high dreams to ground-level drama
tesla robotaxi feud alef in transition flight

Welcome to Digital Trends’ weekly recap of the revolutionary technology powering, connecting, and now driving next-gen electric vehicles. 
Buckle up, folks — this week we’re taking off with a look at the futuristic dream of flying electric cars possibly gliding above U.S. roads sooner than you think. But before we get carried away, let’s bring it back down to the bumpy road of present-day realities.
Even if you’re mostly interested about the tech powering the electric vehicle (EV) revolution, it’s become increasingly hard to avoid the politics around it: You guessed it, we’re talking about this week’s public feud between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and U.S. President Donald Trump.
What does this have to do with EV tech? Well, quite a lot actually. For starters, the technology behind Tesla’s Autopilot and Full-Self Driving (FSD) modes may return in the crosshairs of regulators: Despite the names, these are still driver-assist features that require active driver supervision, and until Trump’s election, they had been under heavy scrutiny by safety regulators for several years.
Last year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration  (NHTSA) launched an investigation into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with FSD. Big questions remain about the driver-assist system's performance under adverse, yet naturally-occurring conditions such as fog, sun glare, rain, and snow.
When Musk, who spent about $275 million to help elect Trump, was appointed to head a newly-created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), it raised more than a few eyebrows about his power and influence over the regulators who are supposed to oversee traffic safety, and therefore Tesla.
It didn’t help that the Trump administration followed Musk’s recommendations and relaxed crash-reporting requirements put in place since 2021, while also relaxing rules to accelerate the deployment of fully-automated robotaxis.
The Trump/Musk clash takes place just as Tesla is due to launch its robotaxi pilot progam in Texas later this month. While Trump is now threatening to pull billions of dollars in government subsidies and contracts from Musk’s companies, it’s unclear whether he might pressure the Department of Transportation to again tighten the regulatory screws on Tesla. What is clear is that Trump has never been a fan of electric vehicles and is already trying to end federal subsidies on EV purchases and leases. And while he had made a big deal about buying a bright red Tesla Model S back in March, Trump now says he wants to sell it.
Back to the tech
Meanwhile, Tesla is still required to respond to information and data requests from NHTSA regarding the safety of its robotaxis by July 1. And ultimately, it should come down to the performance of the technology.
For Autopilot and FSD, Tesla has opted for less expensive navigational tech relying on multiple onboard cameras that feed AI machine-learning models. But especially for so-called adverse driving conditions, it’s the more expensive technology relying on a blend of pre-mapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar) which has received the nod of regulators.
Waymo, the sole robotaxi service currently operating in the U.S., and Zoox, Amazon’s upcoming robotaxi service, both use that blend of navigational tech.
For its robotaxis, Tesla is said to have upped its game in terms of autonomous driving with its Hardware 4 (HW4) technology, which does include radar sensors and promises enhanced environmental perception.
Will that be enough for Tesla to convince regulators, catch up with Waymo, or compete effectively with Zoox?
We’ll have to wait and see.
Flying cars
In a recent edition, we noted that while consumer confidence about robotaxi technology is on the rise, most people also want more data before they hop into a self-driving vehicle.
What about flying taxis? According to a recent survey by Honeywell, nearly all U.S. airline fliers, or 98%, said they would consider using a so-called electric vertical take-off and landing vehicle, or eVTOL, as part of their travel journey.
But while the buzz around flying electric vehicles has mostly focused on air taxis— like Archer Aviation’s Midnight, expected to fly athletes around the 2028 LA Olympics, or Joby’s slick air taxi, backed by Toyota — one California startup is shooting for something a little more... driveable.
Meet Alef Aeronautics, a Bay Area company that wants to put the “car” back in “flying car.” This week, Alef announced it has received over 3,400 pre-orders for its electric flying vehicle, the Model A — and get this: it’s not a futuristic prototype gathering dust in a lab. Alef says production could begin by the end of 2025, or early next year.
On the ground, the Model A operates like a low-speed electric car, complete with hub motors in the wheels and—wait for it—a real steering wheel. You can legally drive it at up to 25 mph on public roads, parking it in a normal garage like any other EV. It’s refreshingly manual in an increasingly hands-free world.
But when it's time for lift off, the steering wheel takes a backseat. For vertical takeoff and flight, the Model A transforms into a drone-like aircraft. Its cabin rotates sideways to create lift, and eight electric rotors—controlled by a flight system and joysticks—take over. No pedals, no yoke, just a bit of joystick magic (or autopilot, if you prefer).
The Model A has already received the nod from regulators for test flights.
While the $300,000 price tag won’t fit everyone’s budget, the company is clearly betting on a future where you don’t have to choose between a car and a flying machine—you can have both.

Read more
8 key things you need to know from Apple’s WWDC 2025 event
From a fresh look and updated names, to new features, more intelligence and live translation
iOS 26, iPadOS 26 and macOS 26 shown on devices.

The WWDC 2025 keynote ran for just over an hour and a half. For those of you who don't fancy sitting through the whole presentation, we've pulled out the key things you need to know from the latest Apple event.

1. Welcome to the 26 club

Read more
Tesla’s robotaxi service is almost here, but it’s not the car you want to see
Silver Tesla Model Y Juniper side

Tesla chief Elon Musk has said that the automaker is aiming to launch its robotaxi service on June 22, in Austin, Texas.

“Tentatively, June 22,” Musk said in a post on X on Tuesday, adding: “We are being super paranoid about safety, so the date could shift.”

Read more