Skip to main content

Road rave: Getting muddy with Firestone’s latest off-road tire

Most of us take the tires on our car for granted. A typical vehicle will need new tires only a few times in its life, and depending on the vehicles you buy and how long you keep them, you might even go a decade or more without visiting a tire store. For the most part, we just accept the tires that are on the vehicle when we buy it.

I recently attended a tire launch event (yes, that’s a thing, just like cars) and had a chance to spend some time with employees of Firestone Tire and learn a little more about how tires are made and what the differences are between them. As with most topics related to a modern car, there’s a lot more going on than you might think, and some very smart people are putting their best efforts into making long-lasting, high-performance tires for a variety of applications.

You wouldn’t put a fat set of off-road tires on a Ferrari, and you wouldn’t put on a set of high-performance summer tires for driving in the snow.

“One analogy that we use a lot that is about shoes,” says Justin Hayes, Product Manager for Light Trucks and SUVs at Firestone’s parent company, Bridgestone. “So if you walk to the grocery store, if you walk on the beach, if you’re running on a trail, or if you need to shovel snow in your driveway, you’re going to want to put a very different shoe on your foot for each of those activities.”

The analogy Hayes makes is that the type of tire that you need on a vehicle is based on the intended usage. You wouldn’t put a fat set of off-road tires on a Ferrari, and you wouldn’t put a set of high-performance summer tires on your car for driving in the snow.

Popular tire categories

“If you’re planning on highway and city driving, we recommend an HT tire, meaning Highway Terrain,” Hayes explains. “Those tires can go on gravel roads or your yard if you need to drive on the grass or something like that. But it’s really they are intended for an on-road application.”

Most tires on the market fall into the HT category, from top performance tires to all-season radials.

“If you’re expecting to be off-road a little bit more,” Hayes says, “and you need a little bit more traction capability, then we recommend an AT, or All-Terrain tire. It’s a lot more squared off on its shoulder and has a more open tread.”

Like any system on a car, there are trade-offs between different choices.

“The Highway Terrain tire is going to be a little quieter, all things being equal,” Hayes allows. “While the AT tire is going to be louder, but it will have more traction off road.”

At the far end of the spectrum from highway tires is the MT or Maximum Traction category, designed to keep a 4WD vehicle moving over mud, rocks, loose surface, or any other obstacles you might encounter. We were in the mountains of Virginia to try out Firestone’s latest MT offering, the Destination M/T2.

“We see two types of users of an MT tire,” Hayes remarks. “Those who really need that traction, and those who really just love the off-road look. You see a lot of lifted trucks, lifted Jeeps, those guys. They just love a big luggy-looking tire even if it never goes off road. They want the 20-inch and 22-inch rim diameters.”

The trade-off with driving an MT tire on the street is extreme noise and comparatively limited traction on pavement.

MT tires also continue their knobby tread pattern onto the sidewall of the tire. There are two traction benefits to that when you’re off-road. First, if your tires are in grooves, the side lugs (as they’re called) will grab the sides of the grooves and help you along. Second, if you have to reduce pressure in your tires to get the grip, the side lugs become part of the tread face, adding to your available traction.

The trade-off with driving an MT tire on the street is extreme noise and comparatively limited traction on pavement. You can hear the roar any time a truck goes by with big off-road tires.

“So you can kind of see with the shoe analogy,” Hayes points out. “I have my flip flops for the beach, I’ve got my walking-around shoes, I’ve got my hiking shoes.”

Differences you can’t see

It’s easy to see the differences between a big knobby off-road tire and a smooth dry pavement performance tire, but there are other differences you can’t see, such as the rubber compound used to make the tread.

“From a compound perspective, in general the highway tire is going to be softer compared to an MT tire,” Hayes says, “because we really want that MT tire to resist chips and tears knowing it’s going to go off-road. The tire compound has an impact on the contact area, which influences tread-wear, rolling resistance, and wet performance. It’s very important for noise as well.”

The softest compounds are used on winter tires designed for snow and ice driving, because they need to conform around ice crystals and squeeze out the thin layer of water that covers most ice. Modern winter tires also use sipes, which are razor-thin cuts in the treads to help the tires grip on snow.

“That’s going to give you maximum traction in snow,” Hayes says.

Using an MT tire in hideous conditions

We were in Virginia to torture test Firestone’s newest tire, the Destination M/T2, designed for maximum traction in mud, loose dirt, and over rocks, so that’s what we did. With help from Overland Experts, who also train the U.S. military in off-road driving, we took a brace of Jeeps outfitted with the Firestone tires over a staggeringly impossible course that took us on trails, up hillsides, and down a few hundred yards of mud wash.

The tires performed as we knew they would, but here’s the thing. Most serious off-road courses require that you deflate your tires to give them extra ability to deform around rocks and dig in to whatever muck you happen to be driving through. We did all these exercises at the listed pressure for on-pavement driving, and the Firestone tires just ate it all up. We even left the diff locks turned off for the duration. Running through axle-deep mud, the Jeeps never entirely lost traction. The verdict was easy: these tires do what Firestone says they do.

What you care about

This is all interesting information if you get totally geeked out about tires, but ultimately, what you care about is this – if you buy the right tires for the kind of driving you do most often, you’re getting a piece of equipment that has been carefully thought through and developed as thoroughly as your car’s engine or brakes. There really is more to the tires underneath your car than meets the eye.

Jeff Zurschmeide
Jeff Zurschmeide is a freelance writer from Portland, Oregon. Jeff covers new cars, motor sports, and technical topics for a…
The week in EV tech: From sky-high dreams to ground-level drama
tesla robotaxi feud alef in transition flight

Welcome to Digital Trends’ weekly recap of the revolutionary technology powering, connecting, and now driving next-gen electric vehicles. 
Buckle up, folks — this week we’re taking off with a look at the futuristic dream of flying electric cars possibly gliding above U.S. roads sooner than you think. But before we get carried away, let’s bring it back down to the bumpy road of present-day realities.
Even if you’re mostly interested about the tech powering the electric vehicle (EV) revolution, it’s become increasingly hard to avoid the politics around it: You guessed it, we’re talking about this week’s public feud between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and U.S. President Donald Trump.
What does this have to do with EV tech? Well, quite a lot actually. For starters, the technology behind Tesla’s Autopilot and Full-Self Driving (FSD) modes may return in the crosshairs of regulators: Despite the names, these are still driver-assist features that require active driver supervision, and until Trump’s election, they had been under heavy scrutiny by safety regulators for several years.
Last year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration  (NHTSA) launched an investigation into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with FSD. Big questions remain about the driver-assist system's performance under adverse, yet naturally-occurring conditions such as fog, sun glare, rain, and snow.
When Musk, who spent about $275 million to help elect Trump, was appointed to head a newly-created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), it raised more than a few eyebrows about his power and influence over the regulators who are supposed to oversee traffic safety, and therefore Tesla.
It didn’t help that the Trump administration followed Musk’s recommendations and relaxed crash-reporting requirements put in place since 2021, while also relaxing rules to accelerate the deployment of fully-automated robotaxis.
The Trump/Musk clash takes place just as Tesla is due to launch its robotaxi pilot progam in Texas later this month. While Trump is now threatening to pull billions of dollars in government subsidies and contracts from Musk’s companies, it’s unclear whether he might pressure the Department of Transportation to again tighten the regulatory screws on Tesla. What is clear is that Trump has never been a fan of electric vehicles and is already trying to end federal subsidies on EV purchases and leases. And while he had made a big deal about buying a bright red Tesla Model S back in March, Trump now says he wants to sell it.
Back to the tech
Meanwhile, Tesla is still required to respond to information and data requests from NHTSA regarding the safety of its robotaxis by July 1. And ultimately, it should come down to the performance of the technology.
For Autopilot and FSD, Tesla has opted for less expensive navigational tech relying on multiple onboard cameras that feed AI machine-learning models. But especially for so-called adverse driving conditions, it’s the more expensive technology relying on a blend of pre-mapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar) which has received the nod of regulators.
Waymo, the sole robotaxi service currently operating in the U.S., and Zoox, Amazon’s upcoming robotaxi service, both use that blend of navigational tech.
For its robotaxis, Tesla is said to have upped its game in terms of autonomous driving with its Hardware 4 (HW4) technology, which does include radar sensors and promises enhanced environmental perception.
Will that be enough for Tesla to convince regulators, catch up with Waymo, or compete effectively with Zoox?
We’ll have to wait and see.
Flying cars
In a recent edition, we noted that while consumer confidence about robotaxi technology is on the rise, most people also want more data before they hop into a self-driving vehicle.
What about flying taxis? According to a recent survey by Honeywell, nearly all U.S. airline fliers, or 98%, said they would consider using a so-called electric vertical take-off and landing vehicle, or eVTOL, as part of their travel journey.
But while the buzz around flying electric vehicles has mostly focused on air taxis— like Archer Aviation’s Midnight, expected to fly athletes around the 2028 LA Olympics, or Joby’s slick air taxi, backed by Toyota — one California startup is shooting for something a little more... driveable.
Meet Alef Aeronautics, a Bay Area company that wants to put the “car” back in “flying car.” This week, Alef announced it has received over 3,400 pre-orders for its electric flying vehicle, the Model A — and get this: it’s not a futuristic prototype gathering dust in a lab. Alef says production could begin by the end of 2025, or early next year.
On the ground, the Model A operates like a low-speed electric car, complete with hub motors in the wheels and—wait for it—a real steering wheel. You can legally drive it at up to 25 mph on public roads, parking it in a normal garage like any other EV. It’s refreshingly manual in an increasingly hands-free world.
But when it's time for lift off, the steering wheel takes a backseat. For vertical takeoff and flight, the Model A transforms into a drone-like aircraft. Its cabin rotates sideways to create lift, and eight electric rotors—controlled by a flight system and joysticks—take over. No pedals, no yoke, just a bit of joystick magic (or autopilot, if you prefer).
The Model A has already received the nod from regulators for test flights.
While the $300,000 price tag won’t fit everyone’s budget, the company is clearly betting on a future where you don’t have to choose between a car and a flying machine—you can have both.

Read more
8 key things you need to know from Apple’s WWDC 2025 event
From a fresh look and updated names, to new features, more intelligence and live translation
iOS 26, iPadOS 26 and macOS 26 shown on devices.

The WWDC 2025 keynote ran for just over an hour and a half. For those of you who don't fancy sitting through the whole presentation, we've pulled out the key things you need to know from the latest Apple event.

1. Welcome to the 26 club

Read more
Tesla’s robotaxi service is almost here, but it’s not the car you want to see
Silver Tesla Model Y Juniper side

Tesla chief Elon Musk has said that the automaker is aiming to launch its robotaxi service on June 22, in Austin, Texas.

“Tentatively, June 22,” Musk said in a post on X on Tuesday, adding: “We are being super paranoid about safety, so the date could shift.”

Read more