Skip to main content

No 'frequent launcher' points for Tesla owners, power limited if mode overused

Tesla is proud of its performance vehicle’s Launch Mode, which is used to electronically help drivers get the very best possible acceleration from a standing start. Nevertheless, you don’t get “frequent launcher” points from Tesla — on the contrary, if you use Launch Mode too often, your performance car’s power will be automatically limited. Tesla confirmed the practice, noting that other performance cars do the same thing,  according to Electrek.

Electrek reported some manufacturers void the vehicle warranty when their performance car launch control systems are used too often. “Too often” isn’t defined, unfortunately, so if you’re in the market for a high-powered vehicle that has an electronically aided launch mode, just know that there is a limit to how many times you can use it.

Recommended Videos

There are two highly rational reasons manufacturers oversee and exercise control of their highest-powered cars, neither of which has anything to do with fun. One point stressed by manufacturers is that full-power acceleration launches are hard on vehicle components, adding undue stress and strain that can lead to early wear and even failure. That’s why real race cars are always accompanied by trailers full of spare parts.

A second valid reason performance carmakers want owners to cool it with full acceleration starts is the danger to the public as well as to the occupants of the car. The Tesla Model S P90D with Ludicrous mode has more than 500 horsepower and is capable of 0 to 60 times in 2.6 seconds. In the P90D’s user manual, the section on Launch Mode states, “Launch Mode is designed for use on closed circuit driving courses. It is the driver’s responsibility to ensure that driving style and acceleration do not endanger or inconvenience other road users.”

It also could be that, in addition to concerns about early part failure and actual danger from too frequent full-power starts, carmakers don’t want over-exuberant drivers using launch mode-like features whenever they pull out of the grocery store parking lot, drop their kid off at soccer practice, or pull away from a stop sign. If drivers routinely went full out with their cars it would reflect on the manufacturer and inevitably cut sales. It’s much better to exude the impression of massive amounts of power used responsibly.

Owners could reasonably consider the limitation of performance features they’ve already paid for as overreaching by the carmaker, especially if there was no advance notice that there’s a penalty for overuse, which appears to be the case with Tesla performance version vehicles. Electrek quoted one owner on the Tesla Motors Club forum who stated, “I did lots of testing and emailed Tesla my findings. Before this limitation my car would pull around 1600 amps from the battery and 512 KW of power when fully charged, now the car will only pull around 1500 amps and 480 KW of power, a loss of about 40 HP on a 4-month-old car.”

The same owner also posted Tesla’s response, “Thank you for your time. To recap our conversation, using launch mode places an increased stress on the entire powertrain accelerating aging and fatigue of various components. The computer systems automatically track launch mode usage and continually estimate fatigue damage. Depending on how launch mode is used, the computer may eventually limit the available power during launch mode to protect the powertrain. Note that this is a common strategy also employed in other high-performance cars. As discussed, upgrading to the P100D ludicrous will remove this limit and will not be limited in the future as the P100D does not have this limit for launch mode.”

Tesla confirmed the position to Electrek in a statement, “Like other automakers, our performance vehicles continually monitor the condition of various components and may employ limiting strategies to reduce fatigue on the powertrain.”

So it sounds like Tesla indeed limits launch mode use with the P90D vehicles. If you buy or upgrade an existing vehicle to the P100D level — an expensive proposition either way that results in an even more powerful vehicle — the reasoning and concerns behind limiting power when drivers overuse the full acceleration mode should still matter, so something is a little off with this picture. Just because drivers can afford an even more costly version of an already fairly expensive car doesn’t argue they’ll be any more restrained in doing full power burnouts after dropping books off at the library.

The good news is Tesla is apparently going to inform buyers that overusing Launch Mode, on P90Ds anyway, can result in decreased available power.

Bruce Brown
Bruce Brown Contributing Editor   As a Contributing Editor to the Auto teams at Digital Trends and TheManual.com, Bruce…
Waymo and Toyota explore personally owned self-driving cars
Front three quarter view of the 2023 Toyota bZ4X.

Waymo and Toyota have announced they’re exploring a strategic collaboration—and one of the most exciting possibilities on the table is bringing fully-automated driving technology to personally owned vehicles.
Alphabet-owned Waymo has made its name with its robotaxi service, the only one currently operating in the U.S. Its vehicles, including Jaguars and Hyundai Ioniq 5s, have logged tens of millions of autonomous miles on the streets of San Francisco, Los Angeles, Phoenix, and Austin.
But shifting to personally owned self-driving cars is a much more complex challenge.
While safety regulations are expected to loosen under the Trump administration, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has so far taken a cautious approach to the deployment of fully autonomous vehicles. General Motors-backed Cruise robotaxi was forced to suspend operations in 2023 following a fatal collision.
While the partnership with Toyota is still in the early stages, Waymo says it will initially study how to merge its autonomous systems with the Japanese automaker’s consumer vehicle platforms.
In a recent call with analysts, Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai signaled that Waymo is seriously considering expanding beyond ride-hailing fleets and into personal ownership. While nothing is confirmed, the partnership with Toyota adds credibility—and manufacturing muscle—to that vision.
Toyota brings decades of safety innovation to the table, including its widely adopted Toyota Safety Sense technology. Through its software division, Woven by Toyota, the company is also pushing into next-generation vehicle platforms. With Waymo, Toyota is now also looking at how automation can evolve beyond assisted driving and into full autonomy for individual drivers.
This move also turns up the heat on Tesla, which has long promised fully self-driving vehicles for consumers. While Tesla continues to refine its Full Self-Driving (FSD) software, it remains supervised and hasn’t yet delivered on full autonomy. CEO Elon Musk is promising to launch some of its first robotaxis in Austin in June.
When it comes to self-driving cars, Waymo and Tesla are taking very different roads. Tesla aims to deliver affordability and scale with its camera, AI-based software. Waymo, by contrast, uses a more expensive technology relying on pre-mapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar and lidar (a laser-light radar), that regulators have been quicker to trust.

Read more
Aston Martin DBX S is the world’s most powerful SUV, if you ignore electric
Aston Martin DBX S

British brand Aston Martin has unveiled what it is the most powerful non-electrified SUV on the market in the DBX S. The new flagship SUV blends the dynamism of the DBX 707 with engine enhancements derived from the Valhalla supercar, to deliver what the company is promising to be a more engaging drive through increased power, reduced weight, and a more assertive design.

The DBX S continues Aston Martin’s tradition of using the ‘S’ suffix to denote higher-performance versions of existing models – something it first did back in 2004 with the Vanquish S. 

Read more
I drove 500 miles with Android Automotive, here’s why every car needs it
Google News on Android Automotive on the Chevy Equinox 2025

The worlds of smartphones and cars have long been colliding, as Google and Apple have prioritized building new experiences with CarPlay and Android Auto, respectively, even as carmakers have continued to develop their own infotainment experiences. 

Despite the success of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, both platforms have key issues, namely that they run on top of the car’s operating system, which means they lack the tight integration that yields the best experience and rely on your phone for certain functions. To address these issues, both companies have also been developing operating systems that can power cars.

Read more