Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Cars
  3. News

Police blame Tesla crash on distracted driving, not tech, though questions remain

Add as a preferred source on Google
Tesla Model S crash in South Jordan, Utah
South Jordan Police Department

The driver of a Tesla Model S is lucky to be alive after she rammed into the back of a parked fire truck in South Jordan, a suburb of Salt Lake City, Utah at about 60 mph. The accident happened on Friday, May 11, according to local media reports. The driver had Autopilot turned on before the impact but police investigators have now blamed distracted driving, not technology.

Examining the vehicle logs — almost like a plane’s black box but for cars — reveals the driver repeatedly turned the Tesla’s Autosteer and Traffic Aware Cruise Control features on and off in the moments leading up to the crash. She took her hands off the steering wheel for more than a minute on two separate occasions and admitted she was looking down at her phone while driving. The California-based automaker has repeatedly emphasized drivers must keep their eyes on the road and their hands on the steering wheel at all times, even when using Autopilot.

Recommended Videos

“About one minute and 22 seconds before the crash, she re-enabled Autosteer and cruise control, and then, within two seconds, took her hands off the steering wheel again. She did not touch the steering wheel for the next 80 seconds until the crash happened; this is consistent with her admission that she was looking at her phone at the time,” the police wrote, according to website The Truth About Cars.

Witnesses told the police the Tesla made no attempt to stop or slow down before it hit the truck. The logs revealed the driver pressed the brake pedal fractions of a second before the impact. It was too little, too late. The South Jordan police ticketed the driver for “failure to keep proper lookout.”

This leaves one important question unanswered: why didn’t the Tesla brake on its own? The armada of on-board sensors, cameras, and radars should have detected the imminent impact with an object of not-insignificant size and automatically applied the brakes to at least mitigate the collision. Tesla hasn’t commented on this point. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) sent a team to investigate the crash.

An ambulance took the 28-year-old driver of the Model S to the hospital with a broken right ankle. Her injuries are not life-threatening, which is a small miracle considering the severity of the accident. The impact completely destroyed the Model S’ front end and somehow ripped off the driver-side door, totaling the sedan. The fire truck and its driver fared much better. The person behind the wheel complained of neck and back pain but required no treatment and drove off in the same truck that got rear-ended.

If you’re experiencing déjà vu, it’s likely because this isn’t the first time a Tesla rammed into a parked fire truck this year. In January, a Model S traveling at about 65 mph rear-ended a fire engine parked on the interstate in Culver City, California. The driver blamed Autopilot. The investigation into the cause of the accident remains open as of early May.

The news of the Utah crash certainly didn’t please Tesla co-founder and CEO Elon Musk.

“It’s super messed up that a Tesla crash resulting in a broken ankle is front page news and the ~40,000 people who died in US auto accidents alone in past year get almost no coverage,” he wrote on Twitter. He accurately added an impact at that speed usually results in severe injury or death.

He’s spoken out about the media’s coverage of Tesla crashes before. During a controversial earnings call, the executive revealed he’s tired of the bad press surrounding Tesla accidents and pledged to release quarterly safety reports to persuade the public and the press that its cars are safe. We’ll see the first report at the end of the second quarter.

South Jordan police sergeant Samuel Winkler stressed drivers need to understand what their car is — and, importantly, isn’t — capable of.

“[Drivers] believe these vehicles will do more than they’re capable of. We would like them to be cautious and double-check their owner’s manuals to see exactly what these features can and can’t do, and if they should be used on certain roads and not on others,” he said.

Ronan Glon
Ronan Glon is an American automotive and tech journalist based in southern France. As a long-time contributor to Digital…
Your next ‘cheap’ new EV isn’t coming – unless you buy used
Representative image of EVs charging

The global electric-car market is in a weird pricing flux. In Britain, Hyundai has opened orders for the Ioniq 3, a compact electric hatchback that starts at £22,245, or £18,495 after the country's £3,750 Electric Car Grant. The 61kWh version can travel up to 308 miles (WLTP range), while higher-end trims add features such as Matrix LED headlights and Hyundai's new Pleos Connect infotainment system, based on Android Automotive OS.

Cross the Atlantic, however, and that particular proposition disappears. Hyundai has no current plans to bring the Ioniq 3 to the U.S. Meanwhile, Cox Automotive put the average U.S. new-EV transaction price at $54,754 in August 2026. The gap is not simply about one car. It highlights a broader problem: while other markets are producing increasingly affordable electric cars, the U.S. still has remarkably few mainstream EVs around the 20,000-25,000 mark.

Read more
BMW’s new electric SUV coupe has 428 miles of range and offers impressively fast charging
BMW’s new iX4 can add 184 miles before your coffee gets cold
BMW iX4

BMW has officially revealed the iX4, and while the swooping coupe-SUV shape will probably get most of the attention, the numbers under the hood are what's really impressive. The BMW iX4 50 xDrive is rated for a preliminary maximum of 428 miles of EPA range, powered by a 112.2kWh usable battery and dual electric motors producing 463 horsepower.

The company claims it can sprint from 0-60 mph in 4.7 seconds. Just like the BMW iX5, the iX4 is a redesign of the brand's X4.

Read more
Rivian’s new Pet Cam lets you check on your dog right from your phone’s lock screen
The new feature combines the R2's interior camera with Pet Mode, giving you a quick way to make sure your pup is comfortable while you're away.
Rivian R2 Pet Cam

Leaving your dog in the car, even for a quick coffee run, always comes with a little worry. Is your pup okay? Rivian wants to put those worries to rest with its 2026.36 software update, which brings a new Pet Cam feature to the R2.

According to Rivian, over 60% of its owners bring their dogs along for the ride, so it's no surprise the company keeps adding pet-friendly features. Pet Mode already keeps the cabin cool and comfortable. Now, Pet Cam lets you actually see how your pet is doing.

Read more