Skip to main content

TomTom GO 500 review

TomTom GO 500 front
Image used with permission by copyright holder
TomTom GO 500
MSRP $229.00
“TomTom has the edge in terms of map accuracy and traffic information repeatedly besting Waze and other services. But many drivers will turn to free smartphones alternatives anyway.”
Pros
  • Reliable maps
  • Excellent traffic information
  • Quick response times
Cons
  • Smaller icons make interface trickier
  • Smart phone required for traffic info

The trouble with navigation isn’t usually finding your destination, it’s finding the quickest way to your destination. One of the first companies to deliver useful live traffic information to solve that problem on its portable navigation devices was TomTom. Now the company is giving it a new spin with its $250 GO 500.

Recommended Videos

Rather than relying on costly subscriptions and built-in cellular data services, the TomTom GO 500 relies on live traffic information sent from a Bluetooth connected smartphone. It collects live traffic information — position and speed — from fellow TomTom users and shares relevant information for your route. No more additional fees, and free live traffic for life.

The device has a 5-inch touch screen and free maps for life (covering the U.S., Canada, and Mexico). Also included are 3D maps of major metropolitan areas showing animated landmarks along your route and detailed lane diagrams at complicated intersections. TomTom also updates the location of what it euphemistically calls “safety cameras,” those controversial red-light cameras that are cropping up in more municipalities.

New Paradigm Setup

Before testing, we connected the GO 500 to a PC to make sure we had the latest software updates. The TomTom MyDrive online system is sleek, easy to follow, and quick. Once we confirmed we were up to date, we then downloaded the companion MyDrive app to a smartphone (it’s compatible with iOS and Android phones; Blackberry and Windows users need not apply).

Popping open the app, one can check out current traffic. You’ll see an array of orange and red car icons that represent other TomTom drivers peppering congested areas like Manhattan. There’s also what is known as flow data indicating the average speed on nearby roads (red means stay away from FDR Drive, orange means 3rd Avenue is a better bet). It’s all business compared to the colorful bubble heads of Waze.

Tethering your phone to the navigation device lets you use your existing data plan to receive traffic information. Over several hundred miles we didn’t see a bump of more than a few megabytes of data usage.

GO Drive, She Said

In the car, TomTom’s included window mount is unobtrusive and sticky, so it doesn’t create more of a blindspot than it has to and yet remains stubbornly adhered to the windshield. Power is maintained via an included 12-volt adapter.

A second system we tested for comparison occasionally triggered the GO 500 with its own robotic responses (if only they could really talk to one another).

In striving to be more svelte, in some ways the TomTom interface has become trickier to navigate over the years. Older models used large, clunky icons to launch address searches and change settings. They were unattractive, and they took a few more steps, but they were obvious. The GO 500 uses a simplified but smaller array of icons that can be difficult to tap your way through (you should always be parked to do so, of course). On the other hand, entering an address is a single-step process and you can pinch to zoom the touch screen.

The built-in voice recognition is a listener of average abilities. After you say, “Hey, TomTom,” to launch it, you can bark out addresses with relatively few missteps. Although if you look for something unanticipated, like a Canadian address while you are in the United States, the voice recognition will be flummoxed. Humorously, a built-in car voice recognition system we tested alongside it for comparison occasionally triggered the GO 500 with its own voice responses (if only they could really talk to one another).

The basic staples of navigation — maps and traffic — are first rate on the GO 500. Over several hundred miles of testing in the Northeastern U.S. and Canada, it steered us unerringly in the right direction (even around some nasty traffic problems in Ottawa). Newer streets, such as a recently finished private hotel road, were correctly identified when other systems — including Waze — missed it entirely. Traffic information and handy re-routing were extremely welcome along the I-95 corridor where changing construction schedules can cause hours-long delays.

Still a Place for PNDs?

The decline in the use of dedicated portable navigation devices is undeniable. Smartphones have become the default navigators, music players, and cameras for many owners.

However, TomTom was still able to demonstrate that it has the edge in terms of map accuracy and traffic information. The company says it has roughly 150 million drivers in the U.S. providing information, updated every 2 minutes and covering some 99 percent of the country’s roads. In our tests, it repeatedly bested Waze and other live traffic information services. Leveraging owners’ smartphones to deliver that information to the windshield-mounted TomTom navigation device is also a clever way to eliminate additional monthly charges.

In spite of the benefits, however, we can’t help but recognize that many drivers will doubtless decide to forgo the GO 500’s accuracy in favor of freely available smartphone apps.

Highs

  • Reliable maps
  • Excellent traffic information
  • Quick response times

Lows

  • Smaller icons make interface trickier
  • Smartphone required for traffic info
John R. Quain
Former Digital Trends Contributor
John R. Quain writes for The New York Times, Men's Journal, and several other publications. He is also the personal…
I drove 500 miles with Android Automotive, here’s why every car needs it
Google News on Android Automotive on the Chevy Equinox 2025

The worlds of smartphones and cars have long been colliding, as Google and Apple have prioritized building new experiences with CarPlay and Android Auto, respectively, even as carmakers have continued to develop their own infotainment experiences. 

Despite the success of Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, both platforms have key issues, namely that they run on top of the car’s operating system, which means they lack the tight integration that yields the best experience and rely on your phone for certain functions. To address these issues, both companies have also been developing operating systems that can power cars.

Read more
Uber partners with May Mobility to bring thousands of autonomous vehicles to U.S. streets
uber may mobility av rides partnership

The self-driving race is shifting into high gear, and Uber just added more horsepower. In a new multi-year partnership, Uber and autonomous vehicle (AV) company May Mobility will begin rolling out driverless rides in Arlington, Texas by the end of 2025—with thousands more vehicles planned across the U.S. in the coming years.
Uber has already taken serious steps towards making autonomous ride-hailing a mainstream option. The company already works with Waymo, whose robotaxis are live in multiple cities, and now it’s welcoming May Mobility’s hybrid-electric Toyota Sienna vans to its platform. The vehicles will launch with safety drivers at first but are expected to go fully autonomous as deployments mature.
May Mobility isn’t new to this game. Backed by Toyota, BMW, and other major players, it’s been running AV services in geofenced areas since 2021. Its AI-powered Multi-Policy Decision Making (MPDM) tech allows it to react quickly and safely to unpredictable real-world conditions—something that’s helped it earn trust in city partnerships across the U.S. and Japan.
This expansion into ride-hailing is part of a broader industry trend. Waymo, widely seen as the current AV frontrunner, continues scaling its service in cities like Phoenix and Austin. Tesla, meanwhile, is preparing to launch its first robotaxis in Austin this June, with a small fleet of Model Ys powered by its camera-based Full Self-Driving (FSD) system. While Tesla aims for affordability and scale, Waymo and May are focused on safety-first deployments using sensor-rich systems, including lidar—a tech stack regulators have so far favored.
Beyond ride-hailing, the idea of personally owned self-driving cars is also gaining traction. Waymo and Toyota recently announced they’re exploring how to bring full autonomy to private vehicles, a move that could eventually bring robotaxi tech right into your garage.
With big names like Uber, Tesla, Waymo, and now May Mobility in the mix, the ride-hailing industry is evolving fast—and the road ahead looks increasingly driver-optional.

Read more
The Ioniq 5 is once again eligible for the $7,500 tax credit
2025 Hyundai Ioniq 5

After a brief and confusing absence, the Hyundai Ioniq 5 is once again eligible for the full $7,500 federal tax credit — and this time, it's sticking around (at least for now). So, what happened? Let’s unpack the ride.

The Ioniq 5, a sleek and tech-savvy electric crossover, initially made headlines not just for its design, but for being built at Hyundai’s brand-new Metaplant in Georgia. That domestic assembly qualified it for the EV tax credit under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which requires vehicles to be made in North America with batteries sourced from trade-friendly countries. But early in 2025, the Ioniq 5 vanished from the list. Why? Likely due to its battery packs, which were then still being sourced from SK On’s Hungarian facility.

Read more