Skip to main content

TomTom XL 340 S Review

TomTom XL 340 S
“Point-A-to-B drivers will love the accurate drive times, no-nonsense address entry, and generous screen on the TomTom XL 340 S.”
Pros
  • Large screen; flat-folding windshield mount; good build quality
  • attractive materials; advanced lane guidance; functional text-to-speech; quick operation
Cons
  • Software needs a facelift; accidental detachment from mount; rerouting can be too slow

Summary

If the tiny screen on TomTom’s minimal-but-adequate One navigators has you careening into other lanes as you squint to see your next turn, the XL line of navigators represent an easy step forward to the land of 4.3-inch widescreen bliss. (And relative safety for the people driving next to you.) The XL 330 and XL 340 models line up identically with their smaller One 130 and One 140 cousins on the feature front, with only a $50 gap separating the big guys from the little ones. Both lines use “S” in the name to denote text-to-speech capabilities, making the XL 340 S we reviewed the high-end unit in the XL line before moving up to the pricier Go line of premium nav systems.

TomTom XL 340 SFeatures and Design

Recommended Videos

Much like the TomTom One 140 S we’ve already reviewed, the XL 340 S sits at the top of its respective line, with only the roomier 4.3-inch screen differentiating the two. That means it includes Map Share technology for updating maps, TomTom’s new flat-folding EasyPort mount, and text-to-speech capabilities for spoken street names, meaning you’ll hear “turn on Burnside” rather than “turn left.” It also includes IQ routes (which uses actual data harvested from TomTom users to plan the fastest route based on real driving speeds), advanced lane guidance (which shows a driver’s view perspective of upcoming highway interchanges) and safety camera alerts.

Unlike the One line which has a cheaper-looking unit at the very bottom of the price scale, all the XL models look identical. You would never be able to tell these guys apart in a line up; but that’s not to say they aren’t attractive. The XL 340 S has been cloaked in matte black plastic all around the outside and rimmed on the face by a slim silver outline. The combo looks swank and resists fingerprints, which is more than can be said of some glossy-faced competitors. There’s a power button up top, a two-inch speaker on back, and a mini USB port below for charging and connecting it to a computer. It measures 0.9 inches thick at its very center, but that’s only at the circular speaker, which adds some considerable depth. The rest of the unit barely strays over half an inch in thickness.

TomTom XL 340 STesting and Usage

TomTom recently transitioned its entire GPS line to use the same slim, flat-folding windshield mount, which it calls EasyPort. Unlike the clunkers we’ve seen in the past, the new unit folds flat against the back of the unit when not in use, effortlessly swivels 360 degrees in place, and locks to the glass with a twisting motion, which produces a killer grip. Although it’s undeniably cleaner than past versions, the GPS pops out of its rotating ring so easily that you actually need to hold both pieces when you move it, lest it end up on the floor. It’s not hard, but you might just end up frantically trying to fish it out of the passenger foot well a few times before that method becomes ingrained.

As a side benefit, the compact mount does make it far more convenient to remove both the mount and GPS from the car windshield together, helping keep a theft magnet out of plain view.

For all the changes on the outside, the software running on the XL 340 S hasn’t come far from a few years past, meaning it’s starting to look a little aged beside similar-priced units from competitors like Mio and Garmin. The lack of aliasing (which produces smoother-looking lines) on the map may be the most glaring omission here. When the main screen quite literally looks indiscernible from a five-year-old model from the same company, it’s time for an update.

That said, the lack of bells and whistles also seems to keep the OS quick and snappy. It opens every menu item instantly, boots up in less than five seconds, and plotted a route from Portland to San Francisco in under 20 seconds. We also love the extent that TomTom allows customization of everything from the style of virtual keyboard to the individual colors on the map during the day and at night. Though the interface isn’t the most intuitive we’ve ever used, a series of tutorials that pop-up the first time around for all the major functions help lessen the learning curve for novice users (know-it-alls can turn them off, too).

TomTom XL 340 SAs a navigator, the TomTom XL 340 S works just as well as the others we’ve tested, with a slight edge from the screen size. For instance, we appreciated the extra room, when entering addresses thanks to the bigger keyboard, and of course, it makes the map view easier to see as well. The 7-million-deep POI library turned up most of the destinations we needed without delay, and routes seem even more refined than those from previous TomTom units, which had an occasional hiccup with back streets. We only wish it rerouted more quickly after missed turns, or had the foresight to give some time buffer with the new directions. Often, we would miss a turn only to have it continuously spit out new streets to take as we were passing them.

Though the computer-generated voice that reads out directions isn’t perfect (they never are), we seldom had many issues comprehending the rather robotic voice box. IQ routes also helped predict drive times more accurately, though not quite as well as higher-end TomTom units, which have the driving speeds more finely segmented by time of day (to compensate for traffic). Advanced lane guidance can be a boon for seriously complex intersections, but don’t expect the lifelike illustrations you’ve seen on navigators like the Go 930. Instead, the One 140 S provides them as icons in the corner: three white arrows with the far right one highlighted, for instance. That doesn’t make it any less useful, though. If anything, we appreciated not having the whole screen taken away to show an intersection, which can sometimes be confusing.

Conclusion

When you’re ready to step away from a barebones navigator that’s been cooking in your glove box for years, but not quite willing to shell out hundreds for features like built-in FM transmitters and MP3 player, TomTom’s XL 340 S makes a lot of sense. Point-A-to-B drivers will love the accurate drive times, no-nonsense address entry, and generous screen on the TomTom XL 340 S. But for another $50, we can’t help but point out that Garmin’s Nuvi 265 WT adds some other very practical features, including free live traffic, Bluetooth, and more up-to-date graphics.

Pros:

  • Large screen
  • Flat-folding windshield mount
  • Good build quality, attractive materials
  • Advanced lane guidance
  • Functional text-to-speech
  • Quick operation

Cons:

  • Software needs a facelift
  • Accidental detachment from mount
  • Rerouting can be too slow
Nick Mokey
As Digital Trends’ Editor in Chief, Nick Mokey oversees an editorial team covering every gadget under the sun, along with…
Jeep Compass EV breaks cover—but will it come to the U.S.?
jeep compass ev us newjeepcompassfirsteditionhawaii  4

Jeep just pulled the wraps off the all-new Compass EV, and while it’s an exciting leap into the electric future, there's a catch—it might not make it to the U.S. anytime soon.
This is a brand new electric version of the Jeep Compass, and being built on Stellantis' STLA platform—the same architecture underpinning models like the Peugeot E-3008 and E-5008—it looks much slicker and packs a lot more inside than previous versions of the Compass.
Let’s start with what’s cool: the new Compass EV is packing up to 404 miles of range on a single charge, a 74 kWh battery, and fast-charging that gets you from 20% to 80% in about 30 minutes. Not bad for a compact SUV with Jeep's badge on the nose.
There are two versions: a front-wheel-drive model with 213 horsepower and a beefier all-wheel-drive version with 375 horsepower. That AWD setup isn’t just for looks—it can handle 20% inclines even without front traction, and comes with extra ground clearance and better off-road angles. In short, it’s still a Jeep.
The design's been refreshed too, and inside you’ll find the kind of tech and comfort you’d expect in a modern EV—sleek, smart, and ready for both city streets and dirt trails.
But here’s the thing: even though production starts soon in Italy, Jeep hasn’t said whether the Compass EV is coming to America. And the signs aren’t promising.
Plans to build it in Canada were recently put on hold, with production now delayed until at least early 2026. Some of that might have to do with possible U.S. tariffs on Canadian and Mexican vehicles—adding a layer of uncertainty to the whole rollout.
According to Kelley Blue Book, a Stellantis spokesperson confirmed that the company has “temporarily paused work on the next-generation Jeep Compass, including activities at” the Canadian plant that was originally meant to build the model. They added that Stellantis is “reassessing its product strategy in North America” to better match customer needs and demand for different powertrain options.
So while Europe and other markets are gearing up to get the Compass EV soon, American drivers might be left waiting—or miss out entirely.
That’s a shame, because on paper, this electric Jeep hits a lot of sweet spots. Let’s just hope it finds a way over here.

Read more
Tesla just scrapped the Cybertruck range extender
Tesla CEO Elon Musk behind the wheel of a Cybertruck.

The writing was pretty much on the wall for the Cybertruck range extender last month when Tesla removed the option from its website. Now, it’s officially scrapped it and is refunding the $2,000 deposits that customers put down for the $16,000 battery pack. 

“We are no longer planning to sell the range extender for Cybertruck," Tesla said in a message to customers on Wednesday, adding, "As a result, we will be refunding your deposit in full.”

Read more
Zoox recalls robotaxis after Las Vegas crash, citing software fix
zoox recall crash 1739252352 robotaxi side profile in dark mode

Amazon's self-driving vehicle unit, Zoox, has issued a voluntary safety recall after one of its autonomous vehicles was involved in a minor collision in Las Vegas. The incident, which occurred in April 2025, led the company to investigate and identify a software issue affecting how the robotaxi anticipates another vehicle’s path.
The recall, affecting 270 Zoox-built vehicles, was formally filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Zoox said the issue has already been addressed through a software update that was remotely deployed to its fleet.
Zoox’s robotaxis, which operate without driving controls like a steering wheel or pedals, are part of Amazon’s entry into the autonomous driving space. According to Zoox’s safety recall report, the vehicle failed to yield to oncoming traffic while making an unprotected left turn, leading to a low-speed collision with a regular passenger car. While damage was minor, the event raised flags about the system’s behavior in complex urban scenarios.
Establishing safety and reliability remain key factors in the deployment of the relatively new autonomous ride-hailing technology. Alphabet-owned Waymo continues to lead the sector in both safety and operational scale, with services active in multiple cities including Phoenix and San Francisco. But GM’s Cruise and Ford/VW-backed Argo AI were forced to abandon operations over the past few years.
Tesla is also expected to enter the robotaxi race with the launch of its own service in June 2025, leveraging its Full Self-Driving (FSD) software. While FSD has faced heavy regulatory scrutiny through last year, safety regulations are expected to loosen under the Trump administration.
Zoox, which Amazon acquired in 2020, says it issued the recall voluntarily as part of its commitment to safety. “It’s essential that we remain transparent about our processes and the collective decisions we make,” the company said in a statement.

Read more