Skip to main content

180 million Americans watch movies and TV online each month

Hulu Plus (Modern Family) (Sept 2010)This post is not a video, but if it were, you’d probably watch it. 180 million people watch video online each month in the United States, representing about 85 percent of the Internet population. And they don’t watch one video. The average video watcher consumes 200 videos a month, totaling 13 hours, leading Dan Piech, senior product management analyst at ComScore to call the market “established and mature,” reports MediaPost.

Speaking at the OMMA Video conference in San Francisco, Piech said that there has been a definite shift toward watchers of premium video (TV shows, movies) watching their content online. 8 percent of TV fans watched their favorite shows online in 2010, up from 4 percent a year earlier. The biggest reason most people do this (70 percent) is to watch an episode they missed on TV, but 57 percent cite “convenience” as their main reason for watching online and 56 percent do so to watch an older episode.

Finally, 42 percent say they watch TV online because it has less ads. Online video has seen a big increase in ad frequency and duration in 2010, however, and viewers are getting fed up. ComScore says that 5-6.5 minutes of ads per episode is the limit most people are willing to sit through online. In 2009, that number was 6-7 minutes. Online viewers want fewer ads. The good news is that most TV shows haven’t exceeded this limit. Most premium video has five minutes (or less) of ads and commercials.

It would be interesting to see the metrics on how Netflix, Hulu, and other video services stack up to free options. While online video viewing seems to have doubled year-over-year, it’s still in its infancy. 13 hours a month is nothing when compared to the 140+ hours most Americans spend watching television. Still, it is a start. As more and more content becomes available, and Internet TVs begin to populate the market, the shift will become more dramatic.

Jeffrey Van Camp
Former Digital Trends Contributor
As DT's Deputy Editor, Jeff helps oversee editorial operations at Digital Trends. Previously, he ran the site's…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more