Skip to main content

AMD’s Polaris may be the graphics cards we need, but perhaps not the ones we want

2016 is a make or break year for AMD as fans hope that a strong showing from upcoming Zen CPUs and Polaris GPUs can turn around the company’s ailing fortunes. However, if they are hoping that Polaris is going to burst on to the scene and dominate the very top end of the graphics card spectrum, they may be disappointed, as AMD has stated that it’s targeting a powerful, “mainstream” desktop segment with the chips.

That’s not to say that the chips won’t be powerful; they will be. Indeed, the die shrink that both Nvidia and AMD are taking advantage of with their next-gen graphics processing units (GPUs) should allow them to pack more transistors onto the chip, making them more powerful and more efficient.

Recommended Videos

But absolute power is not what this generation of hardware is about, according to AMD. It’s about providing the best VR-capable hardware it can to consumers, at an affordable price tag.

Related: More rumors point to June release of Nvidia’s much-anticipated GTX 10-series graphics

Out of the two graphics lines it will produce this year, Polaris 11, will be aimed at the “notebook market,” while Polaris 10 will offer mainstream “desktop and high-end gaming notebook support.”

“The reason Polaris is a big deal is because I believe we will be able to grow that TAM (total addressable market) significantly,” said AMD’s Roy Taylor in a chat with Ars. “I don’t think Nvidia is going to do anything to increase the TAM, because according to everything we’ve seen around Pascal, it’s a high-end part.”

Although we have yet to see much of Nvidia’s cards so far, that’s the impression we’ve had, too. The first card that Nvidia did show off using its latest hardware was the Tesla P100, an absolute monster of an enterprise card with seven terabytes of memory. Gamer hardware won’t be anything like that, but it does show the image Nvidia wants to portray for its new generation.

Indeed, graphics cards historically have been judged by the most powerful card that a company can put forward, whether the much more profitable and popular midrange is good value for the money or not.

But it’s that value segment of the market, the most profitable segment, is what AMD looks to be targeting with Polaris.

And that’s not a bad plan really, especially with the big VR push going alongside it. It might be a bit of a gamble on whether the new entertainment medium takes off, but getting powerful graphics cards down to respectable price levels is a big part of that. Currently, the recommended specifications for VR suggest a R9 290 or GTX 970, both of which will cost you upwards of $300.

If AMD could offer that sort of power in a card that was much cheaper, with better drivers and energy efficiency, that’s something worth taking note of. Indeed, AMD believes it will also have a lot of support from gamemakers for taking this step.

Related: Leaker braves Nvidia’s ire with images of GTX 10 series cooling shrouds

“If you look at the total install base of a Radeon 290, or a GTX 970, or above, it’s 7.5 million units,” continued Taylor. “But the issue is that if a publisher wants to sell a $50 game, that’s not a big enough market to justify that yet. We’ve got to prime the pumps, which means somebody has got to start writing cheques to big games publishers. Or we’ve got to increase the install TAM.”

In some senses, Taylor’s statements are a little surprising. We heard previously from AMD’s graphics lead, Raja Koduri, that AMD did have something special in the works for fans wanting maximum power. Perhaps the changing of the company’s tune was part of the reason it delayed the monstrously powerful, last-generation Radeon Pro Duo, which only debuted recently?

AMD fans will likely be saddened to learn that AMD isn’t aiming for the performance crown, but when only a couple of people can realistically afford those sorts of cards, does it really matter?

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is a freelance evergreen writer and occasional section coordinator, covering how to guides, best-of lists, and…
Leakers may have been wrong about AMD’s next-gen GPU
AMD Radeon RX 9070 GPUs from different brands

AMD's RX 9000 series is almost here, ready to battle it out against some of the best graphics cards. Not a day goes by without some new leaks about the cards' performance or price. Today, we got some scoop on the former from a reliable leaker on X (formerly Twitter). While pretty vague -- as these things often are -- the leak implies that some of the predictions we've already heard about the RX 9070 may have been wrong.

The latest update on RDNA 4 comes from momomo_us on X. This is a reliable leaker with a good track record for GPU and CPU news, but as always, take the following with some skepticism.

Read more
AMD’s RX 9070 XT might be cheap, but that may not be enough
An Asus RX 9070 XT TUF GPU.

Over a month after the initial announcement at CES 2025 (if you can even call it an announcement), we still don't know much about the future of AMD's RDNA 4 lineup. We know the cards are set to launch sometime in March, but their specs remain a mystery. However, there's an even bigger secret that's still yet to be revealed: The pricing.

After a bumpy lead-up to the launch of the RX 9000 series, pricing is the one thing that AMD needs to get right. The latest leaks imply that AMD will price the cards "very aggressively," which could be good news -- but it might still not be enough for it to rival some of the best graphics cards.
A careful approach to pricing

Read more
We finally have good news about AMD’s RX 9070 XT
Radeon logo on the RX 7900 XTX.

AMD announced its next graphics card, the RX 9070 XT, last month, but details about the GPU have been sparse. We might finally have some good news to share, though. According to VideoCardz, AMD is set to hold a press conference later this month that will detail the RDNA 4 architecture and the performance we can expect out of AMD's next GPU.

Although we've long known that AMD would concede the flagship battle to Nvidia in the face of the RTX 5090, Team Red was particularly light on details when it announced the RX 9070 XT. The company didn't so much as share specs for the new card, instead leaving it to board partners to fill in the missing details. Then, the card was reportedly delayed. AMD originally told us it would launch in a matter of "weeks," only to backtrack and point toward a March release later.

Read more