Skip to main content

AMD employee explains why the RX 6500 XT performs so poorly

AMD has just launched the budget-friendly Radeon RX 6500 XT graphics card, and to say that the general response was lukewarm might still be an overstatement. Early reviews and benchmarks have poured in and most people are not impressed by the Navi 24 GPU.

Although the RX 6500 XT is underwhelming for desktop gaming, an AMD employee has just explained the reason why: According to him, the card was actually designed for Ryzen 6000 laptops.

Specs for the AMD RX 6500 XT graphics card.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

To be clear, AMD hasn’t made an official statement as to why the card is not performing as well as you’d expect from a GPU released in 2022. However, John Bridgman, principal member of technical staff at AMD, made a statement that could explain the card’s lackluster performance. First noticed by VideoCardz, Bridgman posted it on Phoronix forums as a reply to someone who remarked on the poor media capabilities of the RX 6500 XT.

Recommended Videos

“The primary use of Navi24 will be in laptops paired with a Rembrandt APU, which has full video functionality and Gen 4 PCIe. My impression was that it was just encode that was limited in Navi 24, not decode — still not sure if that limitation is real or just a typo on the product page. Trying to find out a definitive answer,” said Bridgman.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

The original poster wasn’t wrong: The card doesn’t seem to have much to offer, be it for creatives or for gamers. It lacks encoding support as well as AV1 decoding, which is enough to put off content creators, and its other specifications are not very attractive to gamers either.

The Navi 24 GPU found inside the RX 6500 XT has 5.4 billion transistors on a 107mm die. It has 16 compute units, 16 ray accelerators, 1,024 stream processors, 64 texture units, and 32 render output units (ROPs.) It also only features two display pipelines as opposed to the four found in RDNA 2 graphics cards. Other specifications of the RX 6500 XT include 4GB of GDDR6 memory and a 64-bit memory bus, as well as a boost clock of up to 2,815MHz.

A forum post about the AMD Radeon Navi 24 GPU.
Source: Phoronix Image used with permission by copyright holder

Bridgman’s post may not be an official statement from AMD, but it does serve as an explanation why a card with such specifications was released in the first place. Tom’s Hardware has shared some of the reasons that AMD has talked about in the past, citing the fact that the company wanted to make the RX 6500 XT unattractive to cryptocurrency miners — which is why its specifications were cut down.

The card hit the shelves as an entry-level offering priced with an MSRP of $200. Although it sold out very quickly and can now only be bought from scalpers (often priced well above $400,) the market at large was still unimpressed. However, if AMD really meant to release the Navi 24 GPU as a graphics card for the upcoming Ryzen 6000 Rembrandt APUs, it could have more potential than what we’re seeing in this desktop version.

The AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT consumes too much power and heats up too much to be used in laptops in its current form, but the Navi 24 GPU could work in a laptop after some adjustments. It still wouldn’t be one of the best graphics cards for gaming, but it wouldn’t be as big a disappointment as this desktop version seems to be.

Combining the RX 6500 XT with an AMD Rembrandt APU may have some merit to it. AMD’s upcoming APUs already have some media and graphic capabilities of their own, so the duo could be effective in midrange laptops. However, as it is now, there are probably better graphics cards you could be buying instead of the RX 6500 XT.

Monica J. White
Monica is a computing writer at Digital Trends, focusing on PC hardware. Since joining the team in 2021, Monica has written…
This surprising new AMD GPU came out of nowhere
Biostar's AMD RX 580.

As we're all on the lookout for AMD's RDNA 4 graphics cards, I'm telling you right out of the gate: They're still not here. However, Biostar launched a new AMD GPU that's fairly ... unexpected, to say the least. In fact, I'd sooner expect AMD to just drop RDNA 4 into our laps with no warning than for Biostar to launch this GPU. Which card am I talking about? Why, the RX 580, of course -- a GPU that's now seven years old.

The new RX 580 comes in a stylish white shroud, but on the inside, it's still the same GPU that's in no danger of competing against some of the best graphics cards. The RX 580 sports 2,048 stream processors (SPs), 8GB of GDDR5 VRAM across a 256-bit bus, and a maximum clock speed of 1,750MHz. The card supports the PCIe 3.0 interface and comes with two DisplayPort 1.4a ports as well as one HDMI 2.0. Those specs are pretty outdated for 2024.

Read more
AMD’s new GPU could bring PS5 Pro-like performance to laptops
Cyberpunk 2077 running on the Asus ROG Zephyrus G14.

AMD has quietly launched the Radeon RX 7800M GPU built on the current RDNA 3 architecture for gaming laptops. This GPU is designed to bring desktop- and console-level gaming experiences to portable laptops. What’s particularly intriguing about the RX 7800M is its close resemblance to the newly revealed PlayStation 5 Pro, which is thanks to a similar spec sheet that allows it to deliver comparable performance in a portable form factor.

The latest laptop graphics card is based on the Navi 32 GPU architecture and comes with 12GB of 18Gbps GDDR6 VRAM, likely utilizing a 192-bit memory bus and offering a total memory bandwidth of 432GB/s. It includes 48MB of Infinity Cache and is equipped with 60 Compute Units (CUs), 90 Render Output Units (ROPs), and a thermal design power (TDP) of up to 180 watts. The card runs at a frequency of 2.145GHz and supports popular video rendering formats like H264, H265, and AV1.

Read more
This fascinating new GPU completely ditches fans
ASRock Radeon RX 7900 XTX Passive 24GB graphics card.

We may still be in limbo when it comes to next-gen graphics cards, but ASRock just launched a couple of interesting AMD GPUs. The ASRock RX 7900 XTX Passive and the RX 7900 XT Passive are two of AMD's most powerful consumer graphics cards, but this time around, they're completely fanless. That's right -- without an active cooling solution, these cards rely entirely on passive cooling.

At a glance, no one would've said that the cards in question are part of AMD's RX 7000 series. After all, the RX 7900 XTX normally features three fans, but this one comes with zero, and it's also significantly thinner than ASRock's other versions of the RX 7900 XTX. Both cards are now just dual-slot, and they're both shorter and thinner than their air-cooled counterparts.

Read more