Skip to main content

AMD’s Ryzen C-series ups the ante on Chromebook performance

AMD has announced a new series of mobile processors that are geared specifically toward upcoming midrange and high-end Chromebooks. In the past year, AMD says its market share of Chromebooks has grown from 5.2% to 21%. So far, that’s consisted exclusively of ultra-cheap Chromebooks powered by AMD’s A-series processors.

Now, AMD has launched a new line of Athlon and Ryzen processors for Chromebooks, known as the Ryzen 3000 C-series. The Ryzen chips are identical to the Ryzen 3000 chips launched for Windows devices in 2019 — AMD says the C-series branding is to help clarify the names for users and potential buyers.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

As Chromebooks have continued to get more expensive and more powerful, some manufacturers have begun to opt for Intel Core processors rather than the slower Celeron or Pentium variety. That’s exactly what these new AMD processors are looking to compete against.

These aren’t the latest Ryzen 4000 processors that introduced eight-core configurations with improved Radeon graphics. Still, they introduce the powerful Zen+ core (Ryzen) and Zen core (Athlon) to the world of Chromebooks, which is a first.

Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
Check your inbox!

Here’s the full rundown of the new Ryzen and Athlon processors.

Cores/Threads Cache Base clock Boost clock Graphics Graphics frequency TDP Architecture
AMD Ryzen 7 3700C 4/8 6MB 2.3GHz 4.0GHz 10 Radeon cores 1.4GHz 15w 12nm Zen+
AMD Ryzen 5 3500C 4/8 6MB 2.1GHz 3.7GHz 8 Radeon cores 1.2GHz 15w 12nm Zen+
AMD Ryzen 3 3250C 2/4 5MB 2.6GHz 3.5GHz 3 Radeon cores 1.2GHz 15w 14nm Zen
AMD Athlon Gold 3150C 2/4 5MB 2.4GHz 3.3GHz 3 Radeon cores 1.1GHz 15w 14nm Zen
AMD Athlon Silver 3050C 2/2 5MB 2.3GHz 3.2GHz 2 Radeon cores 1.1GHz 15w 14nm Zen

The Ryzen 7 3700C lines up exactly with the Ryzen 7 3700U, while the Ryzen 5 3500C matches the Ryzen 5 3500U. These both use the 12nm process Zen+ architecture and feature four cores and eight threads. They should be plenty powerful for these types of laptops, and should easily outperform the 8th-gen Intel Y-series chips found in premium Chromebooks like the Asus Chromebook Flip C434. Meanwhile, performance will be in line with with the Core i5-10210U, found only in top-tier Chromebooks like the Samsung Galaxy Chromebook.

The Ryzen 3 3250C is the outlier. Despite having just two cores, far less graphics cores, and the older Zen architecture, it’s given the “Ryzen” brand nonetheless. This could be to fight against the proliferation of Intel Core m3 processors as the base configuration for Chromebooks like the Pixelbook Go.

The Athlon Gold and Athlon Silver are both dual-core processors — one with simultaneous multithreading and one without. These fall into the midrange area, but would be a big step up in performance compared to the A-series chips. AMD does, however, say it will continue to support budget-level systems with its A4 and A6 chips.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

AMD didn’t offer direct comparisons to Intel or MediaTek Chromebooks. Instead, the company offered performance numbers for its chips in benchmarks such as PCMark and 3DMark. The graph shows that the Ryzen 7 is 151% faster than the A6 in 3DMark Slingshot, which is an Android-based graphics benchmark. Meanwhile, the Ryzen 7 is 153% faster in the Android-based PCMark Photo Editing.

For native performance, AMD states that the Ryzen 7 is also 153% faster in the web-based Speedometer 2.0 benchmark, which measures speed in running browser-based JavaScript applications.

AMD says there are total of six different Ryzen and Athlon Chromebook designs coming in 2020, though how many of each remains to be seen. We expect to see announcements from companies like HP, Dell, and Lenovo soon. AMD even mentioned that some designs would be oriented toward the commercial market.

Editors' Recommendations

Luke Larsen
Senior Editor, Computing
Luke Larsen is the Senior editor of computing, managing all content covering laptops, monitors, PC hardware, Macs, and more.
AMD vs. Intel: the rivalry has never been more fierce
An AMD Ryzen 7000 processor slotted into a motherboard.

If you’re building your own PC, there’s plenty of criteria to consider when molding your machine. What operating system do you plan on using? What graphics card will be best for gaming? And where exactly can one buy all these components? There’s a lot to think about, but one important decision you can’t forget is whether you’ll be using an AMD or Intel processor for your new machine.

A war of chips and cores that shows no sign of stopping, the age-old battle of AMD vs Intel is a classic competition, but is one processor brand better than the other? That’s where we come in. 

Read more
This might be why AMD’s FSR 3 isn’t picking up momentum
Combat in the game Nightingale.

AMD's platform-agnostic FSR 3 is a great feature, but months after releasing, it's only available in a small list of titles. Now, we might finally have a clue as to why.

Developers of the upcoming open world survival game Nightingale posted a development update stating that it was removing FSR 3 due to crashes. "After reviewing crash data from the Server Stress Test, a significant number of them seemed to point to FSR3 integrations, whether or not users had the setting turned on," a prelaunch update post reads.

Read more
AMD’s new CPU slammed as ‘anti-consumer at best’
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 propped up against an action figure.

AMD makes some of the best processors, but this one is most likely not one of them. According to a video review of the recently released Ryzen 7 5700, the CPU is not only a letdown -- it's downright misleading. Compared to previous non-X Ryzen processors, the 5700 appears to be significantly cutdown, which affects its performance in a big way.

Historically, AMD's non-X Ryzen CPUs were pretty much the same as their X counterparts, but with slightly lower clock speeds. Take the Ryzen 5 5600 and the Ryzen 5 5600X, for example. Both chips have six cores and 12 threads, as well as 32MB of cache, but the Ryzen 5 5600 has a clock speed of 4.4GHz, while the 5600X hits 4.6GHz. As a result, many chose the non-X part due to it being slightly cheaper while not being a major downgrade.

Read more