Skip to main content

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X vs. Ryzen 5 7600: is cheaper better?

AMD’s Ryzen 7000 CPUs haven’t had the best reception, but Team Red is correcting course. The new Ryzen 5 7600 is proof of that. It’s slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 7600X based on the spec sheet, but it’s around $70 cheaper, comes with a bundled cooler, and promises nearly identical performance.

After testing the processor myself, I can confirm — the Ryzen 5 7600 is one of the best processors you can buy right now. With a couple of clicks, it can achieve identical performance as the Ryzen 5 7600X, and it comes in at a cheaper price.

Recommended Videos

Specs

Pads on the bottom of the Ryzen 9 7950X.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

Spec-for-spec, the Ryzen 5 7600X and Ryzen 5 7600 are almost identical. The biggest difference is clock speed, with the Ryzen 5 7600 having a much lower base clock speed, as well as a slightly lower boost clock speed. Otherwise, you’re getting the same six Zen 4 cores and 38MB of cache across both processors.

The Ryzen 5 7600 also has a much lower-rated power draw. It tops out at 65 watts, and AMD has claimed much better efficiency compared to X-series parts. Even with similar specs, the lower power could make a difference in performance. On the other hand, that makes the processor ideal for small form factor builds where power and thermals are a concern.

Ryzen 5 7600X Ryzen 5 7600
Cores/threads 6/12 6/12
Base clock 4.7GHz 3.8GHz
Boost clock 5.4GHz 5.1GHz
Cache 38MB 38MB
Power draw 105W 65W
Cooler N/A Wraith Stealth
List price $300 $230

The Ryzen 5 7600 comes bundled with AMD’s Wraith Stealth cooler, while the Ryzen 5 7600X doesn’t come with a cooler at all. That saves you around $50 on a CPU cooler, and even more if you want an all-in-one liquid cooler.

Pricing

The Ryzen 5 7600X sitting among thermal paste and RAM.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

There’s no contest between the Ryzen 5 7600X and Ryzen 5 7600 when it comes to price. The X-series part lists for $300, while the non-X part is $230. As mentioned, the Ryzen 5 7600 also includes AMD’s Wraith Stealth cooler in the box, while the Ryzen 5 7600X doesn’t include a cooler at all.

You’re getting a less powerful processor with the Ryzen 5 7600 — though, not by much, as I’ll get to next — but you’re still getting six Zen 4 cores, 38MB of cache, DDR5 memory support, and a just slightly slower boost clock speed. For value, the Ryzen 5 7600 is the clear winner.

The Ryzen 5 7600X sells for less than list price at the moment, however. It’s around $275, following reportedly poor sales for AMD’s initial batch of Zen 4 processors. Still the non-X part is cheaper and it includes a cooler.

Performance

The Ryzen 5 7600 isn’t as powerful as the Ryzen 5 7600X, but both chips support overclocking. That makes a world of difference for the Ryzen 5 7600. With a bit of CPU overclocking, you’re getting almost identical performance.

First a bit on overclocking. For my testing, I used AMD’s Precision Boost Overdrive (PBO); no fancy overclocks or dense manual tuning. That required downloading the Ryzen Master app, choosing the Auto OC and All Core curve optimizer settings, waiting for about 30 minutes for the utility to optimize the system, and rebooting. That’s all, no voltage or clock speed adjustments needed.

That’s the single most important thing you can do with the Ryzen 5 7600. In Cinebench’s multi-core test, the Ryzen 5 7600 went from 8% behind the Ryzen 5 7600X to 1% behind. We can call that identical performance. In a real-world app like Handbrake, I saw the same thing. The Ryzen 5 7600 took 8% longer than the X-series part, but with PBO, they transcoded in the same amount of time.

The Ryzen 5 7600X still has a minor lead in some areas, though. In single-core tests, for example, overclocking did very little to boost the Ryzen 5 7600, giving the X-series chip around a 6% lead. That was particularly true in the web-browsing benchmark JetStream, but let’s be honest: neither one of these processors struggles when it comes to running web apps.

And some single-core tasks still see a benefit from overclocking. Y-Cruncher calculates 500 million digits of Pi, and it’s particularly good for showing off the AVX-512 support in Ryzen 7000 CPUs. The Ryzen 5 7600X is clearly ahead before using PBO, but the chips are evenly matched after.

Although it’s no secret that overclocking your CPU produces extra performance, it’s essentially free on the Ryzen 5 7600. Given the processor’s low wattage and excellent efficiency, even a two-click overclock in Ryzen Master nets around 5% to 10% more performance, all while costing $70 less than the Ryzen 5 7600X.

Gaming

You don’t need a high-end processor for gaming, and both the Ryzen 5 7600 and Ryzen 5 7600X fit in a sweet spot for a gaming CPU. What shocked me was how big of a difference there was between these two processors, with the Ryzen 5 7600X sometimes offering up to 10% higher performance. PBO changes that.

Not only did applying PBO to the Ryzen 5 7600 bring it to identical levels of performance as the Ryzen 5 7600X, sometimes the non-X chip performed even better. Both F1 2022 and Far Cry 6 were wins for the Ryzen 5 7600 after applying PBO, as was Red Dead Redemption 2 (though that game is heavily limited by your graphics card).

I’m comparing an overclocked CPU to one that isn’t overclocked, but that’s what’s so surprising about the Ryzen 5 7600. Even with PBO applied, it’s much more efficient than the Ryzen 5 7600X. For every 10 watts spent, you’re getting around 10 extra frames per second (fps) with the Ryzen 5 7600, even after applying PBO.

Gaming efficiency for the Ryzen 5 7600.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

You may not need a high-end processor for gaming, but there’s no doubt that the Ryzen 5 7600 is offering an advantage over the Ryzen 5 7600X. With PBO, performance is identical, all while the Ryzen 5 7600 offers better efficiency, a bundled CPU cooler, and a lower price.

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X vs. Ryzen 5 7600: Which should you buy?

There’s no contest here: The Ryzen 5 7600 is the better option out of the two. It’s cheaper, offers near identical performance with PBO applied, and it comes with a bundled CPU cooler. This is the processor we should have seen from the start from AMD.

AMD’s latest generation hasn’t done well, despite flagship chips like the Ryzen 9 7950X offering chart-topping performance. Value has always been the problem. The Ryzen 5 7600 is the solution, offering a much more efficient CPU at a lower price, all while keeping platform features like the AM5 socket and DDR5 intact.

Jacob Roach
Former Lead Reporter, PC Hardware
Jacob Roach is the lead reporter for PC hardware at Digital Trends. In addition to covering the latest PC components, from…
AMD’s Ryzen Z2 Go disappoints in early benchmark
The Lenovo Legion Go S sitting on a window.

A recent YouTube video has showcased the gaming capabilities of AMD's upcoming Ryzen Z2 Go chipset, designed for budget gaming handhelds. As part of the new Ryzen Z2 lineup, the Z2 Go’s capabilities were tested on a Lenovo Legion Go S and compared to last year’s Z1 Extreme powering the Asus ROG Ally X.

According to gaming performance data shared by FPS VN, the Z2 Go shows some limitations compared to the Z1 Extreme. In Black Myth: Wukong, it achieved 36 fps versus 40 fps at 15W, 30 fps versus 32 fps at 20W, and 60 fps versus 64 fps at 30W. In Cyberpunk 2077, the Z2 Go delivered 50 fps compared to 54 fps at 15W, 45 fps versus 47 fps at 20W, and 61 fps compared to 66 fps at 30W. Similarly, in Ghost of Tsushima, the Z2 Go hits 62 fps versus 66 fps at 15W, 48 fps versus 52 fps at 20W, and 62 fps versus 66 fps at 30W. Although the performance gap is minor, it remains consistent at around 7–10% across all tested games.

Read more
AMD’s new Ryzen Z2 chip promises ‘console-class’ performance for handhelds
Steam Deck and ROG Ally sitting together on a table.

As AMD confirmed to Digital Trends last year, the new range of Ryzen Z2 chips is here to kick off 2025. Announced during AMD's CES 2025 keynote, there are three models that make up the Ryzen Z2 range, which AMD says is designed to meet the "explosive demand" for handheld gaming PCs. Although we don't have any specific devices featuring the Ryzen Z2 range yet, AMD says "you'll see [the Ryzen Z2] coming to market from a number of partners -- the Legion Go, the ROG Ally, the Steam Deck."

You can see how the range breaks down below. Similar to AMD's first generation of handheld APUs, we're getting both a base Ryzen Z2 and an Extreme variant. Both come with eight cores and 16 threads, but the Z2 Extreme boasts 16 graphics cores compared to 12 on the base Ryzen Z2. The Ryzen Z2 Extreme can also climb a bit higher, up to 35 watts. Compared to the Ryzen Z1 range, both of these chips also come with a boost to 24MB of cache, compared to 16MB on the Ryzen Z1 Extreme.

Read more
AMD is doing a victory lap with the new Ryzen 9 9950X3D
AMD announcing the 9950X3D.

At this point, AMD has been on top when we're talking about the best processors for gaming, but it still took CES 2025 to do a victory lap and extend its lead. Opening up the keynote address, AMD revealed the Ryzen 9 9950X3D and Ryzen 9 9900X3D, both of which will be available in the first quarter of this year.

The performance here doesn't sway things much, as AMD has already claimed the top slot for gaming processors with its wildly popular Ryzen 7 9800X3D. As you can see below, however, AMD claims an 8% lead over last-gen's Ryzen 9 7950X3D on average after testing 40 games. Unsurprisingly, graphically intensive games like Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora and Black Myth: Wukong see little benefit, but AMD is claiming a lead as large as 58% in a game like Counter-Strike 2. 

Read more