At the heart of your pursuit for a new or upgraded PC beats an important decision: Should you use an AMD or Intel CPU? Like MacOS versus Windows or Apex Legends versus Fortnite, the AMD versus Intel rivalry is one of the greatest debates for PC enthusiasts — and in 2020, these two industry giants are more hotly competitive than they’ve been in the best part of a decade.
Which of them is right for you? We’ll need to dig into the details to find out.
In the past, AMD CPUs were the best option in only budget and entry-level portions of the market, but that’s not the case with its latest generations of CPUs. While AMD still represents great value for the money, it now does so throughout the entire price and performance spectrum, competing with Intel on just about everything and taking a stark lead in a few specifics, even at the high-end.
The most affordable of AMD and Intel chips cost between $40 and $60 for a couple of cores and energy-efficient clock speeds. The best midrange CPUs will set you back between $200 and $350, while top gaming CPUs are priced around $500. If you want to accelerate intensive tasks like video editing and transcoding, you can spend north of $1,000 if your budget allows it.
Intel and AMD have excellent processors for gaming and productivity tasks like video editing and transcoding, but they do have their specialties, too. AMD’s top-of-the-line processors, like the 12- and 16-core 3900X and 3950X, have more cores than anything Intel has on offer outside of the professional space, making them real workhorse processors. They’re good at gaming, too, but at the very top end, Intel’s most capable CPUs, like the 9900K and 10900K, hold a sizable advantage over even AMD’s best.
You don’t need to buy the best to get a great CPU for gaming or work, though. At around the $250 mark, AMD’s Ryzen 7 3700X, with eight cores and a high boost clock, is a fantastic chip for work and play, easily beating out the Intel 10600K in productivity tasks. The Intel CPU, on the other hand, is a more aggressive gaming processor, and if you’re interested in overclocking, it can even reach the kind of in-game performance that the much more expensive 10900K offers.
At the more entry-level segments of the market, AMD’s processors tend to offer better value for money, with standouts like the 3300X and 3600 offering amazing multitasking and gaming performance. Intel’s 10300F is credible competition, though. Budget options like AMD’s 3200G and Intels Core i3 10100 make it possible to start your system without an added graphics card, making them great for general office work and watching Netflix, though not too much more.
There are other reasons than performance you might want to consider AMD or Intel over the other, though. Intel’s latest-generation CPUs have far better support for Thunderbolt 3 ports if that’s something you can make use of. AMD’s latest 500-series motherboards support PCIExpress 4.0, which can enable greater graphics performance in some niche (and, more likely, future) cases, as well as opening up greater options for faster storage solutions.
If you want to use your PC for heavy video editing at high resolutions, perform intensive video transcoding, or any other intensive task that can benefit from even more power than the best mainstream CPUs can offer, then high-end desktop, or HEDT CPUs, could be what you need. Both AMD and Intel have their own options in this space, with higher core and thread counts. AMD’s options remain the most capable and cost-effective, though.
Intel’s HEDT line reaches up to 18 cores and 36 threads with the 10980XE, but even if you can find it in stock, it’s often priced way above its suggested retail price of $980. Although it is technically a 10th-gen CPU, the 10980XE and its fellow Core i9 X-series CPU models are based on Intel’s much older Cascade Lake-X technology, which is far less capable than Intel’s mainstream Comet Lake CPUs on a core-for-core basis. It’s still a powerful CPU, but when you consider AMD’s alternatives, it’s hard to recommend.
AMD’s R9 3950X mainstream CPU already offers credible competition for the 10980XE at under $700, so it offers far better value for money. But if you want extra performance, the sky’s the limit.
AMD’s third-gen Threadripper CPUs offer 24, 32, and even 64 cores with support for double that number of simultaneous threads, all while maintaining clock speeds around the 4GHz mark. If your software can make use of all those extra cores, AMD’s Threadripper CPUs offer unparalleled performance outside of obscenely expensive server CPUs, easily outstripping the Intel competition. They also support a greater number of PCIExpress lanes — 64 versus just 44 on the Intel alternatives — making them more suited to larger storage arrays.
They do come at a premium, with the 3960X, 3970X, and 3990X costing $1,400, $1,850, and $3,600, respectively. If you can make your work more efficient and even more profitable by buying them, though, that cost might be worth paying.
The laptop market is a different story. Most of what you’ll find are based on Intel processors of various generations and integrated graphics. As a Dell representative once indicated, Intel’s portfolio is simply huge compared to AMD, and its current lineup of laptops and the CPUs inside them are better than ever.
Where Intel’s desktop processor development has slowed in recent years, its mobile enhancements have been far more exciting. Ice Lake CPUs introduced a more efficient design with far more capable 11th-gen graphics, offering enough performance to play many e-sports games at around 60 frames per second without the need for a graphics card.
They’re not just great for gaming, though. Ice Lake CPUs have found their way into some of the best laptops of the current generation, like two of our favorite laptops, the Dell XPS 13 and HP Spectre x360 13.
For even more power, Intel has a line of Comet Lake mobile CPUs that have higher clock speeds and are often paired with powerful graphics cards. The Razer Blade 15 is a fantastic example of how high-level gaming performance can be found in the most capable Intel mobile CPUs. They can be used for more productivity tasks, too, in capable devices like the Lenovo Yoga C640.
The breadth of options and manufacturing support mean most laptops still offer Intel CPUs as standard, but as in the desktop space, AMD is making inroads in mobile, too.
The Acer Swift 3 and the 15-inch Surface Laptop 3 were some of the first examples of AMD’s recent mobile advance, and though they weren’t stellar, they showed promise. That push continued in 2020, with stronger releases like the Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 serving as the launchpad for AMD’s new Ryzen 4000 chips for laptops. Lenovo refreshed its Legion gaming laptops in July 2020 with Ryzen 4000 mobile CPUs, pairing them with RTX 20 Series graphics. Now, there are tens of options worth considering.
Both AMD and Intel offer credible performance for work and play, and there are many more considerations to make when buying a laptop than the CPU, so looking at individual model reviews is a must. That said, like the desktop scene, Intel CPUs tend to come included in the best gaming laptops, while AMD’s options tend to find the best value for money without an included graphics chip.
Which is best for you?
For everyday web browsing, watching Netflix, and answering emails, Intel and AMD CPUs will give you excellent performance right out of the box. There are certain tasks, though, where one company’s options perform better than the others.
If you’re looking to work with your processor performing intensive multi-threaded tasks like video editing or transcoding, or heavy multitasking activities with tens of browser tabs open, AMD’s CPUs are more capable at the top end and more cost-effective throughout the price and performance spectrum. Intel’s aren’t bad, but you pay more for the same performance — although that may be worth it if Thunderbolt 3 is something you really need.
If you’re working and playing, then AMD chips still represent the best bang for your buck, even if Intel CPUs will give you better gaming performance once you get outside the entry-level chips. That’s why, for absolute pure gaming performance, Intel CPUs are still the best bet. That’s especially true if you plan to overclock, with Intel’s midrange options, like the Core i5-10600K, capable of producing the kind of performance only previously possible with the most powerful CPUs.
If you’re buying a laptop, you’ll want to look at reviews of the overall machine rather than focusing just on the CPU. While you still may want an Intel Comet Lake CPU for a gaming laptop, there’s a lot more to consider than just the processor. Desktop users should factor that in, too, but there’s usually more scope for picking and choosing your other components or upgrading later if you feel something else needs a boost.
- AMD Ryzen 4000: Everything you need to know
- Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx vs. Intel Core i5
- The best budget laptops for 2020
- AMD Ryzen and Radeon road map: 2020-21 and beyond
- iMac 5K 27-inch (2020) review: An old dog learns a few new tricks