Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

30 years ago, Apple threw the hammer at IBM with the infamous 1984 ad

Add as a preferred source on Google

 In 1984, a war was brewing in Silicon Valley. On one side was Apple, a plucky underdog founded in a garage just a few years prior. On the other, loomed IBM, a titan of industry poised to take over the computer industry and dictate the future of the PC.

Apple, out-numbered and out-funded, had no hope of beating Big Blue on its own terms, so it commissioned an ad to portray its competitor’s strength as a weakness. Big, impersonal, even intimidating, many geeks thought IBM was a soulless corporation that didn’t care about the freedom and creativity that PCs made possible.

Recommended Videos

The “1984” spot captured this argument perfectly, and it did so in one minute while speaking a mere 17 words. Directed by Ridley Scott, already famous for his own work on Alien and Blade Runner, the ad’s dark depiction of mindless viewers spoon-fed propaganda from a giant screen played on contemporary fears that technology might, in the wrong hands, lead to dystopia and dictatorship.

While the ad’s depressing tone, and the absence of the product it advertised, seems to set “1984” a world apart from the bright, cheery, product-focused ads Apple relies on today, there are some similarities. Like the company’s modern spots, “1984” focused on mindset instead of details like specs or pricing. The promise was simple. Buy a Mac, and you’ll be free.

Critics have heaped numerous awards on the ad over the years, including both a Clio Award (in 1984) and induction into the Clio Awards hall-of-fame (in 1995). The success of the spot propelled Lee Clow and Steve Hayden to advertising sainthood; the former went on to create icons like the Energizer Bunny while the latter, in a strange twist of fate, eventually became the head of the IBM account managed at the Ogilvy ad agency.

But one entity didn’t seem to benefit from the ad; Apple. Despite spending an unprecedented $900,000 to produce “1984,” the company only aired the ad twice, relying on coverage from news programs to spread its message. While initial sales of the Macintosh proved strong, they tapered off quickly, and trouble began to brew inside the company as it became clear that IBM remained strong.

The following years would see Microsoft and Intel unseat Big Blue from its throne while a weakening Apple remained in its own niche. Steve Jobs, who supported the ad in the face of opposition from Apple’s board, was forced to resign a year later after losing an internal power struggle with then-CEO John Sculley, and Cupertino’s decline, which would last through the 90s, began.

Today, in a world where Apple rakes in tens of billions of dollars every year, the “1984” spot seems more than a little ironic. No longer an underdog, the company has become as restrictive as the competitors it once rallied against. Yet today’s ads have something in common with this famous spot from three decades ago; a focus on what technology can do. Freedom and creativity remain the soul of Apple, even if those ideals are applied selectively. 

Matthew S. Smith
Matthew S. Smith is the former Lead Editor, Reviews at Digital Trends. He previously guided the Products Team, which dives…
Getting health advice from AI chatbots comes with a problem doctors may never see
Researchers say AI companies should face the same liability as doctors for bad health advice
ChatGPT and pills on the same canvas.

AI chatbots have quietly become a go-to source for medical advice the extent that some are dangerously skipping real doctors. But when AI's health advice goes wrong, doctors may never see the exchange behind it.

Researchers from Binghamton University, Stanford, Texas A&M, and Indiana University published a paper in Nature Health examining what happens after a chatbot gives you bad health information. Their biggest concern is not just that chatbots can be wrong. It is that those mistakes often leave no trace for doctors, researchers, or regulators to catch.

Read more
AI companies expect a catastrophic AI incident and are reportedly preparing for the aftermath
A major AI cyberattack could disrupt essential services, damage public trust, and spark a political fight over regulations.
openai-anthropic-logo-on-screen

Leaders at OpenAI, Anthropic, and other AI companies are reportedly preparing for a potential AI disaster that could turn the public against artificial intelligence. According to an Axios report, industry leaders are privately running through possible scenarios for what happens after a catastrophic AI incident.

What kind of AI disaster are companies preparing for?

Read more
Elon Musk’s SpaceX just made a big move to become a mobile carrier heavyweight in the US
SpaceX moves closer to becoming a major US mobile carrier with $8 billion deal
spacex

Elon Musk’s SpaceX is moving past satellite internet, and it’s making a big move into the US wireless market. The company has agreed to buy cellular spectrum licences from investment firm Grain Management in a deal reportedly worth about $8 billion, its biggest move yet to compete with established mobile carriers such as AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile, according to a WSJ report.

The deal is for spectrum in the 800MHz band, which is for mobile services delivered via terrestrial infrastructure such as cell towers, not satellites. If the acquisition is approved, SpaceX could combine those airwaves with its growing Starlink satellite network to create a more comprehensive wireless service.

Read more