Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Apple’s looking at a politically radioactive fix for the memory crisis, and the US government isn’t happy about it

Apple blamed memory costs for your price hike. Its proposed solution involves a Pentagon blacklist.

Add as a preferred source on Google
Apple Mac Mini on a Desk
Alan Quirván / Pexels

A few days ago, Apple announced an ugly mid-cycle price hike, blaming the worsening-by-the-day memory crisis. According to the Financial Times, the company is now lobbying the government for approval to buy memory chips from a Chinese company. 

The company in question is CXMT, a Chinese chipmaker that the Pentagon added to its Chinese Military Company blacklist for alleged ties to the Chinese army.

So what exactly is Apple asking for here?

Apple is not legally barred from sourcing chips from a Chinese supplier. What it wants, however, is the White House’s nod to do so without the reputational and political risk of being seen as a partner to a Pentagon-listed company. 

Recommended Videos

The Cupertino giant reportedly approached the Commerce Department more than a month ago. Since then, it has been working with contacts across the administration to secure the government’s blessing.

CXMT, already approved for listing on the Shanghai Stock Exchange, is China’s national champion in DRAM chip manufacturing, the same category of memory Apple currently sources from Micron, Samsung, and SK Hynix (via Notebookcheck).

Will Apple actually get the green light?

That’s far from guaranteed. John Moolenaar, the Republican chair of the House China Committee, told the FT the move would be a grave mistake. 

The Commerce Department added CXMT to an intended Entity List package last year, only for the White House to hold it back during trade negotiations with China. 

It’s worth noting that Apple already faced similar backlash in 2022, when it considered sourcing memory from another Pentagon-listed Chinese chipmaker, YMTC, for iPhones sold only in China. 

From where I’m seeing this, Apple’s price increase on Thursday erased $263 billion from its market capitalization in a single day (its second-largest single-day drop), and the company might not want to risk its reputation any further, especially in the eyes of the government.

Shikhar Mehrotra
For more than five years, Shikhar has consistently simplified developments in the field of consumer tech and presented them…
Google’s new Magic Pointer Play Store listing reveals a Gemini shortcut built for Googlebooks
The unannounced app turns the cursor into a contextual AI tool for search, image creation, and shopping
Plant, Text, Business Card

Google has quietly published a new Play Store listing for Magic Pointer, an unannounced app built for Googlebooks. Updated on July 10, the app turns the cursor into a Gemini shortcut that can act on whatever a user selects on screen.

Magic Pointer can send an image to Lens, generate a related image, or surface a shopping action without forcing users to open a separate chatbot. Regular Android devices currently show as incompatible, so the listing offers an early preview rather than a broad release.

Read more
You can stop using AI, but this new report says you probably can’t escape it
A UK survey found that most people feel AI exposure is unavoidable, raising harder questions about consent, privacy, and whether opting out is still realistic
AI Chatbots

More people are trying to use less AI, but avoiding it altogether may already be impossible.

A survey of 2,055 UK adults found that 42% deliberately limit how much AI they use. Another 70% said avoiding AI exposure would be difficult or impossible, even when they actively wanted less of it.

Read more
The face on an AI interviewer may matter as much as the decision it makes
Researchers found that race and gender matching changed how fairly rejected applicants viewed an automated interview, even though everyone received the same outcome
File, Computer Hardware, Electronics

An AI hiring system can treat every applicant the same and still leave some people feeling targeted. Researchers found that rejected candidates judged an automated interview differently depending on the race and gender of the avatar delivering the result.

Around 220 participants completed a simulated interview for a fictional customer support role with one of four photorealistic AI avatars. Everyone was rejected, yet perceptions of fairness shifted with the interviewer’s appearance. An algorithm audit could miss that reaction because candidates don’t experience the system as raw code. They experience a face asking questions and judging their answers.

Read more