Skip to main content

The update debate: Why the latest version of software isn’t always the best

are software updates always for the best not windows update
Image used with permission by copyright holder
If there is one thing that distinguishes the modern state of software, it’s how the software is updated. The days of shipping a patch out on physical media are long gone. Today, patches are instantaneous. It seems many applications and programs can’t go more than a few days without needing something tweaked or fixed, and if users don’t see such updates, they assume the developers are resting on their laurels.

And yet, despite the ease with which fixes can be applied, it’s not necessarily true that having the most up-to-date software is a plus. AMD’s new Crimson drivers are a recent example. Fans jumped on the revamped graphics card back-end, hopeful of the performance and usability improvements it could bring. But some of them were faced with graphical glitches and overheating GPUs thanks to a fan speed bug.

Using fans as testers is great in theory, but puts them on the receiving end of the most disastrous bugs.

Although updates are easier than ever to release and apply, they are rarely mandatory. There are occasional jumps that will cut off users who aren’t willing to perform the update, but rarely is anyone forced to do so. With that in mind, we thought we would ask the question — is it worthwhile to always update to the latest software?

There are certainly some that argue for that. Many companies have taken advantage of user desire to run the latest build, as soon as possible. Perhaps it’s thanks to a climate where our phones are telling us every five minutes that something needs updating, or simply because, as content and products come faster and faster, we want them to improve more quickly, as well.

Using fans as test dummies

The Windows Insider program is the perfect example of how companies are using fans. Microsoft was able to secure itself over a million beta testers for Windows 10, none of whom it had to pay a cent. In years gone past, QA was handled exclusively by in-house employees, a third party company, or at worst, the friends and family of the developers. Most, if not all of those people would require compensation of some kind.

Using fans as testers is great in theory. The fans receive the software first, and the company receives free feedback. But it also puts loyal followers at the receiving end of the most disastrous bugs.

crimsonfeatures
AMD’s Crimson was an important update, but its initial release had a major bug Image used with permission by copyright holder

Some of the latest Windows 10 updates have been far from perfect. The most recent, dropped in November, had to be temporarily pulled due to a privacy bug that reset user privacy settings without their knowledge. The issue is an example of why some people, companies, and governments prefer to stay well away from the latest releases. And as the needs of a user or group of users become more critical, their willingness to adopt an update early decreases.

Older can be better, or at least necessary

The U.S. Navy is currently spending millions of dollars on legacy support from Microsoft for the thousands of systems it has in operation that are still running Windows XP. Why is it running an operating system that is almost a decade and a half old?

For the same reason that a Windows 3.1 bug caused the closure of an entire French airport just last month, and the same reason huge industries still use equipment that requires the use of 3.5-inch floppy disks. Often, an older technology was built with decades of use in-mind, so upgraded alternatives weren’t made, or threaten to break existing functions.

But it’s not just companies that have a good reason to stay technologically in the past. Take the case of George R.R. Martin, the writer of the A Song of Ice and Fire series, more commonly known as Game of Thrones. He’s a big fan of retro technology, even borrowing Ernest Cline’s Delorean at one point. However, it’s in his writing habits that he betrays his love of older software.

While Martin could certainly afford to purchase himself a high-end PC to tap away, he actually uses an ancient DOS based computer that is completely disconnected from the Internet. Even more retro, he uses the ’80s word processor WordStar 4.0 to write everything, including the ASOIAF books.

Why? Because it doesn’t have any features he doesn’t needs. “It does everything I want a word processing program to do and doesn’t do anything else,” he said on a talk show interview. Using the older device likely affords him some unique security benefits, as well.

He doesn’t have to worry about it trying to correct his spelling, which could become quite tiresome with character names like Daenerys Targaryen and Joffrey Baratheon. Nor does he have to be concerned about viruses or people hacking his machine to try and find out what he’s writing.

George R. R. Martin Still Uses A DOS Word Processor

This is a way of thinking that’s worth consideration. While it’s exciting to be on the cutting edge, running betas, and accessing new features, it does have inherit problems. And the benefits of the cutting-edge aren’t always apparent in everyday use.

This one is on the developers

It’s not just down to us to make sure we only install software and updates that we know won’t be harmful to our system. It’s down to the developers, too. QA has become less of a focus for software developers in recent years as the ease of patching programs have improved. That leaves users at risk.

Changing the software used by millions with a single update is a big responsibility.

I’m not suggesting we would all be better off running DOS off a tape drive, but it is important to keep updates in perspective. The ability to change software used by millions of people within minutes — as in the case of Windows update — is a huge responsibility. It must be wielded with responsibility, and it should be recognized that those who don’t jump on the latest technological bandwagon aren’t always luddites. Updates, particularly to critical software, deserve to be viewed with skepticism.

Editors' Recommendations

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale is the Evergreen Coordinator for Computing, overseeing a team of writers addressing all the latest how to…
7 best Chromebooks for 2024: the best for every budget
Close up of the Chrome logo on the top of a Chromebook.

Chromebooks might have a hard time competing with Windows laptops and MacBooks, but that doesn't mean they don't have their place. We've reviewed hundreds of laptops over the years, testing for important qualities like performance, battery life, and display quality — and we've found that Chromebooks consistently excel at performance and reliability.

You can find Chromebooks from Google, HP, Lenovo, Acer, and many others, and we've dug through them to put together this roundup of the best Chromebooks on the market. They're incredibly accessible devices, and for the right person, a Chromebook can be the best laptop in terms of value.

Read more
HP Envy deals: HP’s most popular laptop starts at $630
An HP Envy 17-inch laptop sits on an office desk.

A great computer brand to shop if you’re in the market for a new laptop is HP, which is consistently among the best laptop brands. It has several different model lineups to choose from, with the HP Envy laptop lineup offering a good balance of hardware options and pricing. The HP Envy lineup is also a good one to shop because it regularly turns out some impressive laptop deals. That’s certainly the case right now, as there are a lot of HP Envy deals to shop. We’ve rounded up what we feel are the best HP Envy deals currently taking place, so read onward for more information on how to land some savings.
HP Envy x360 2-in-1 laptop 15Z-FH000 — $630, was $900

The HP Envy x360 convertible laptop is a great option for just about anyone, particularly anyone who enjoys the touchscreen functionality of a tablet. It’s well designed and super slim, making it a truly go-anywhere device. Despite its portability, it still has an immersive 15.6-inch touchscreen that’s great for creators, note-takers, and binge watchers. Top notch build quality and durability, fast charging technology, a fingerprint reader, and great battery life round out the top features of the HP Envy x360 convertible touchscreen laptop. It competes well with the best 2-in-1 laptops. Its versatility and all-around capability make it a worthy companion on any desk, and on any lap.

Read more
Best Surface Laptop and Surface Pro deals: From $450
Microsoft Surface Go 3 sitting on table.

If you want a thin and light laptop that's similar to the MacBook Air but not in the Apple ecosystem, then the Microsoft Surface lineup of laptops is absolutely the way to go. In fact, if you've seen the recent unwrapping of the business version of the Surface Pro 10 and Surface Laptop 6, you might be fired up and ready to grab your own surface. Unfortunately, the Surface lineup can be quite expensive, which is why we've gone out and scoured the retailers for the best deals we could find and collected them below. So, be sure to check out everything, as well as some of these other great laptop deals if you aren't fully committed to the Microsoft Surface lineup.
Microsoft Surface Go 3 -- $450, was $550

Functioning as a 2-in-1 laptop that can switch between tablet mode and laptop mode, the Microsoft Surface Go 3 won't have trouble dealing with basic tasks as it's equipped with the Intel Pentium Gold 6500Y processor and 8GB of RAM. The 10.5-inch touchscreen with 1920 x 1080 resolution is bright and colorful, and its 128GB SSD is more than enough for your documents. The Microsoft Surface Go 3 ships with Windows 11 Home in Mode, so you can start using it as soon as you unbox it. The device also promises up to 11 hours of battery life before requiring a recharge.

Read more