Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Deals

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

This Copilot+ laptop deal drops the ASUS Vivobook 14 to $349.99 at Best Buy (save $400)

A $400 price cut makes this Snapdragon X Vivobook 14 a serious under-$400 everyday laptop option

Add as a preferred source on Google
Amazing Deal ASUS Vivobook 14 deal
Best Buy

If you’re shopping for a lightweight “daily driver” laptop and you don’t want to spend midrange money, Best Buy has the ASUS Vivobook 14 (Copilot+ PC) down to $349.99. That’s $400 off (about 53%) for a modern Windows laptop with Snapdragon X, 16GB RAM, and a 512GB SSD, which is a lot of hardware for this price tier.

What you’re getting

This model pairs a 14-inch display with a taller 1920 x 1200 (WUXGA) resolution in an IPS panel with 300 nits brightness and a 60Hz refresh rate.

On the portability side, the product specs call out 3.28 lb weight and 0.7-inch thickness, plus a battery claim of up to 29 hours with FastCharge (100% in 1 hour).

You also get practical extras people actually use: an FHD IR camera with Windows Hello, a physical webcam shield, and a port mix that includes 2x USB-A, 2x USB-C (with PD + DP), HDMI, and an audio combo jack.

Why it’s worth it

At $349.99, the value is mostly about getting the “big three” right for everyday work: 16GB memory, 512GB storage, and a modern platform that’s meant to feel responsive for browsing, docs, streaming, and general productivity.

One real-world note: because this is a Snapdragon (ARM-based) Windows laptop, it’s smart to sanity-check any niche software or older peripherals you rely on: some apps and drivers may require ARM-compatible versions.

The bottom line

If you want a lightweight 14-inch laptop for school, email, web work, and everyday productivity, this is a strong buy at $349.99, given the $400 discount. If you need guaranteed compatibility with specialized Windows apps, older printer drivers, or certain games, double-check your must-have software before pulling the trigger.

Omair Khaliq Sultan
I'm a writer, entrepreneur, and powerlifting coach. I’ve been building computers and fiddling with PC parts since I was a…
Topics
Google’s new Magic Pointer Play Store listing reveals a Gemini shortcut built for Googlebooks
The unannounced app turns the cursor into a contextual AI tool for search, image creation, and shopping
Plant, Text, Business Card

Google has quietly published a new Play Store listing for Magic Pointer, an unannounced app built for Googlebooks. Updated on July 10, the app turns the cursor into a Gemini shortcut that can act on whatever a user selects on screen.

Magic Pointer can send an image to Lens, generate a related image, or surface a shopping action without forcing users to open a separate chatbot. Regular Android devices currently show as incompatible, so the listing offers an early preview rather than a broad release.

Read more
You can stop using AI, but this new report says you probably can’t escape it
A UK survey found that most people feel AI exposure is unavoidable, raising harder questions about consent, privacy, and whether opting out is still realistic
AI Chatbots

More people are trying to use less AI, but avoiding it altogether may already be impossible.

A survey of 2,055 UK adults found that 42% deliberately limit how much AI they use. Another 70% said avoiding AI exposure would be difficult or impossible, even when they actively wanted less of it.

Read more
The face on an AI interviewer may matter as much as the decision it makes
Researchers found that race and gender matching changed how fairly rejected applicants viewed an automated interview, even though everyone received the same outcome
File, Computer Hardware, Electronics

An AI hiring system can treat every applicant the same and still leave some people feeling targeted. Researchers found that rejected candidates judged an automated interview differently depending on the race and gender of the avatar delivering the result.

Around 220 participants completed a simulated interview for a fictional customer support role with one of four photorealistic AI avatars. Everyone was rejected, yet perceptions of fairness shifted with the interviewer’s appearance. An algorithm audit could miss that reaction because candidates don’t experience the system as raw code. They experience a face asking questions and judging their answers.

Read more