Skip to main content

At long last, the AMD Radeon R9 Nano is ready for its close up

After the announcement at E3, we put AMD’s latest and greatest R9 Fury X to the test. The high-end card boasts built-in liquid cooling, and AMD’s new High Bandwidth Memory, but it wasn’t the only card announced that day, and now we’re getting our first good look at the compact version, the R9 Nano. This air-cooled card packs the same HBM technology and advanced architecture into a form factor that’s half the size, and a fraction of the power consumption.

Photos of the new card, which come from Korean tech reporter DGLee, provide a new look at not just the outside of the card, but its innards as well. The exterior is done up in the same black as the Fury X, but with a dimpled texture around the fan. Unlike the Fury X, the Nano has no backplate, instead featuring a black PCB. As expected, the Nano will utilize three DisplayPorts and a single HDMI for video output, and only requires a single 8-pin PCIe connection for power.  Open up the card, and inside you’ll find AMD’s new Fiji GPU with a healthy glob of thermal paste and copper tubing to run heat up to the heat sink. It weighs just 489 grams, which is around half the weight of full length Radeon cards that don’t have radiators.

Related Videos

While we still don’t have a lot of concrete info on the R9 Nano’s performance, leaked graphs may help place it in comparison to AMD’s other offerings. The first graph shows the performance of the R9 290X, the Nano, and the Fury X. The Nano beats the 290X by a few frames per second, with the Fury X taking a commanding lead. The second graph shows the performance per wattage in terms of memory bandwidth. Both the Nano and Fury X have much more efficient power usage, but the Nano is almost twice as efficient as the 290X. Granted, HBM is a big part of that, as the change in architecture provides a healthy boost to power efficiency and bandwidth on its own.

With so many unanswered questions surrounding the R9 Nano, it’s basically impossible to draw any concrete conclusions besides that it’s small, and doesn’t use much power. If the performance lives up to what’s been rumored so far, the Nano could shape up to be one of the best compact cards yet.

Editors' Recommendations

AMD’s overheating GPUs might be worse off than we thought
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX hovers over a raging fire.

According to an in-depth analysis by an overclocking expert, the overheating issue that has been plaguing some AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX graphics cards seems to be affected by the orientation of the card within the computer.

Popular overclocking expert Roman Hartung shared a video on his YouTube channel, der8auer, that delves into this thermal throttling issue, and he found some interesting results. If the RX 7900 XTX is installed with a vertical orientation, the graphics card seems to run 10 degrees to 15 degrees Celsius cooler than the same card laid horizontally.

Read more
AMD responds to GPU overheating issues with RX 7900 XTX
RX 7900 XTX installed in a test bench.

As the number of AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX owners reporting overheating grows, the company has responded. Initially, complaints were met with a simple statement that temperatures of 110 degrees Celsius were normal and not a cause for concern.

That meant requests to return AMD RX 7900 XTX reference graphics cards were denied. While reaching 110 degrees Celsius might be acceptable, thermal throttling is unexpected behavior. AMD is now asking anyone experiencing throttling to contact AMD customer support for assistance. This isn't the first problem with AMD's latest GPU so hopefully, this is taken care of quickly.

Read more
Bad news: AMD may have launched RDNA 3 before it was quite ready
RX 7900 XTX installed in a test bench.

The new AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT are already here, but a new claim suggests that perhaps they shouldn't be, at least not just yet.

According to the claim, AMD has decided to ship the GPUs in an unfinished state, and not everything can be fixed by simply updating drivers. Did AMD rush to release the new graphics cards before they were ready?

Read more