Skip to main content

AT&T vows to improve ‘inaccurate’ broadband metering

AT&T LogoWith AT&T’s recently announced plans to limit the amount of data its DSL Internet customers can user on a monthly basis right around the corner, the company is reportedly doing a terrible job of accurately determining how much data customers actually use.

According Broadband Reports, AT&T customers have noticed gross disparities between their own analytics information about how much data they’ve used (based on firewall and router logs), and AT&T’s online analytics tools. AT&T’s tests are allegedly so flawed that some users claim AT&T’s meters are off by as much as hundreds of gigabytes.

AT&T has not yet gone so far as to admit that their system is flawed. But they have agreed to work with any customer who believes their data use is being misread by AT&T.

“We’re happy to work one-on-one with any of your readers to walk through the measurement tool and address any questions,” AT&T spokesman Seth Bloom tells Broadband Reports. “We’re already addressing ways we can make the labels and information on the online tool more clear for customers between now and May…I can also assure you our team is performing checks everyday to ensure accuracy.”

The company also says differences in the testing could account for the variation in analytic data.

“Other tools may measure at different 24-hour periods than we do, and most likely do not take into account the standard network protocols (e.g. Ethernet, IP) that are used to provide applications and content to our customers via the Internet,” says Bloom.

According to AT&T’s new user terms, DSL customers will be limited to 150GB of data per month; U-Verse customers get 250GB. The company will charge users $10 for every 50GB they use past their monthly data limit.

Since the average DSL customer only uses 18GB per month, says AT&T, only 2 percent of users will be affected by the data cap. But since it appears as though AT&T’s data meter readings are inaccurate, that number could be entirely off. If so, and if no improvements to the system are made, AT&T Internet subscribers could soon be in for an unpleasant surprise come May 2nd, when the data cap goes into effect.

Andrew Couts
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more