Skip to main content

Australian government wants to know why Adobe, Apple, and Microsoft charge more

australian_currency_mac
Image used with permission by copyright holder

If you’ve ever visited a foreign country or even stumbled upon the UK or Australian branch of a retailer’s website, you’ve probably noticed that all of the prices are different. Australians are finally asking why that is – specifically when it comes to products from Apple, Adobe, and Microsoft, many of which are downloadable software or media. The Australian government is now demanding the three companies explain the difference in prices.

According to MacRumors, the companies refused to send representatives to the initial IT Pricing Inquiry and now the Australian government has sent summonses to all three companies that require them to attend the inquiry with a warning that there will be legal consequences if they don’t attend. 

So are the prices really that different once you account for currency fluctuations and included tax? In short, yes, but the amount that prices vary differs from product to product. A base model, 64GB 11-inch MacBook Air costs A$1,099 ($1,130 USD) in Australia, but $999 in the U.S. Take out the included Australian taxes and the price comes to the same as the U.S. price, A$999, but that’s still $1,027 once you factor in the currency conversion.

Purchasing Adobe Photoshop Elements 11 as a download, where the Australian VAT tax isn’t included, is another pricing adventure. The full version of the program will set you back A$131 ($134 USD) down under, but just $100 in the U.S.. So why does the same downloadable program cost $34 more in Australia than in the U.S.? That’s what the Australian government hopes to find out. It’s possible this could change pricing structures, not just for Adobe, Apple, and Microsoft, but for tech vendors everywhere. This is especially true for vendors of downloadable software and media that can’t blame shipping and stocking overhead on the higher prices. We can’t wait to see how this inquiry plays out. 

Image via kawaiikiri/Flickr

Editors' Recommendations

Meghan McDonough
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Meghan J. McDonough is a Chicago-based purveyor of consumer technology and music. She previously wrote for LAPTOP Magazine…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more