Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Evergreens

ChatGPT vs. Perplexity: battle of the AI search engines

Add as a preferred source on Google
Perplexity on Nothing Phone 2a.
Tushar Mehta / Digital Trends

The days of Google’s undisputed internet search dominance may be coming to an end. The rise of generative AI has ushered in a new means of finding information on the web, with ChatGPT and Perplexity AI leading the way.

Unlike traditional Google searches, these platforms scour the internet for information regarding your query, then synthesize an answer using a conversational tone rather than returning a list of websites where the information can be found. This approach has proven popular with users, even though it’s raised some serious concerns with the content creators that these platforms scrape for their data. But which is best for you to actually use? Let’s dig into how these two AI tools differ, and which will be the most helpful for your prompts.

Recommended Videos

Pricing and tiers

Perplexity is available at two price points: free and Pro. The free tier is available to everybody and offers unlimited “Quick” searches, 3 “Pro” searches per day, and access to the standard Perplexity AI model. The Pro plan, which costs $20/month, grants you unlimited Quick searches, 300 Pro searches per day, your choice of AI model (GPT-4o, Claude-3, or LLama 3.1), the ability to upload and analyze unlimited files as well as visualize answers using Playground AI, DALL-E, and SDXL.

OpenAI is structured much the same way. Anyone can sign up for a free account that grants access to GPT-4o-mini, as well as limited access to the larger GPT-4o model, data analysis, file uploads, vision, web browsing, and image generation.

The $20/month Plus tier, conversely, offers everything that the free tier does, but in greater quantities. You get five times more messages with GPT-4o, access to the o1 model family, full use of the platform’s data analysis, file uploads, vision, web browsing, and image generation features, as well as use of Advanced Voice Mode and OpenAI’s answer to Perplexity, ChatGPT Search.

The new $200/month Pro plan simply provides unlimited priority access to all of those features and models.

Advantages of using ChatGPT

ChatGPT giving a response about its knowledge cutoff.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends

Even if you aren’t a Plus subscriber with access to ChatGPT Search proper, the chatbot platform still has access to the internet and can provide you with up-to-date information. Just as ChatGPT’s Dall-E integration eliminated the need for an external image generator, Search is designed to eliminate the need for an external search engine by blending “the benefits of a natural language interface with the value of up-to-date sports scores, news, and stock quotes,” according to the company.

What’s more, the amount you can do with the information retrieved in ChatGPT is far greater than with Perplexity. With ChatGPT you can analyze, summarize, modify, and edit that content, as well as ask the AI follow-up questions.

Advantages of using Perplexity

While ChatGPT excels at creative tasks, Perplexity is purpose built for the sole task of information retrieval. As such, its responses tend to be more accurate, with more transparent citations to more sources than ChatGPT, and it responds faster. The so-called “answer engine” excels at research tasks, such as summarizing white papers or industry studies, and allows users to enact specific filters in their search criteria, like only pulling information from academic, video sharing, or social media sources.

As with ChatGPT, Perplexity also allows its users to ask follow-up questions about a query, even enabling its AI to recall relevant snippets from earlier conversations.

Which is more accurate?

Talking with Perplexity chatbot on Nothing Phone 2a.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends

While Perplexity AI is not entirely free of suffering hallucination and misattribution errors, it has proven itself to be a far more accurate source of information than ChatGPT Search, despite the company’s questionable data acquisition practices. In fact a recent study from Columbia’s Tow Center for Digital Journalism found that ChatGPT Search struggles mightily in returning factually accurate information to its users.

“From each publisher [of a pool of 20], we selected 10 articles and extracted specific quotes,” the researchers wrote. “These quotes were chosen because, when entered into search engines like Google or Bing, they reliably returned the source article among the top three results. We then evaluated whether ChatGPT’s new search tool accurately identified the original source for each quote.”

Of the 200 total selected articles, “ChatGPT returned partially or entirely incorrect responses on a hundred and fifty-three occasions, though it only acknowledged an inability to accurately respond to a query seven times,” the study found. “Only in those seven outputs did the chatbot use qualifying words and phrases like ‘appears,’ ‘it’s possible,’ or ‘might,’ or statements like ‘I couldn’t locate the exact article.’”

In its defense, OpenAI accused the Columbia researchers of performing their study incorrectly and withholding data. As it is with all models, certain tasks are better suited for certain models, but it varies widely by the specifics of the prompt.

Perplexity is in our list of the best AI chatbots, but is it the one you will choose?

Andrew Tarantola
Former Computing Writer
Andrew Tarantola is a journalist with more than a decade reporting on emerging technologies ranging from robotics and machine…
DigUp lets users find Mac files by describing them, not remembering their names
Can't remember where that screenshot, PDF or recording went? Just describe it and let AI do the digging.
DigUp App in Use screenshot

There's a particular kind of frustration that comes with knowing a file exists somewhere on a computer but having absolutely no idea what it's called. Was that screenshot saved as IMG_4837? Which PDF contained that clause? And where did that podcast recording mention the thing worth remembering? DigUp wants to end the filename guessing game, letting Mac users search for files by describing what they remember instead. The free, open-source app uses Google's EmbeddingGemma 2 to search across photos, documents, PDFs, audio recordings and videos, all without sending personal files to the cloud.

DigUp turns everyday descriptions into file searches

Read more
A new AI detector looks beyond words to check whether the ideas came from AI
This could help journals distinguish AI-written research from human work polished with AI.
ai-writing-book

Most AI detectors look for telltale signs of AI-generated text by examining word and sentence patterns. A new tool called IdeaLens takes a different route to solving this problem. It spots AI-generated research by looking at the ideas behind it instead of the wording itself (via TechXplore).

Researchers from the University of Maryland, Google DeepMind, and Simon Fraser University built IdeaLens to check whether a document's core arguments came from a human or a machine, regardless of who wrote the final draft.

Read more
Anthropic warns of imminent self-replicating AI that might even work off an oven or TV
Self-replicating AI could be merely months away, and tests show it can run on the devices sitting at your home.
Illustration of dangerous AI.

Over the past few weeks, nearly every AI lab has released frontier AI models. Earlier today, Google started rolling out Gemini 4, Argon, hot on the heels of Meta announcing its Muse Wonder frontier AI models to compete against the best from OpenAI and Anthropic's Claude. This relentless pace of AI model release comes at a time when the same AI labs are calling for development slowdown and increased regulation, following a series of concerning incidents where these AI models went rogue and broke into private, as well as government-owned, websites.

Now, Anthropic has dropped a chilling set of predictions about the capabilities of these AI models after running a series of tests. The company claims that small AI models could be merely a few months away from self-replicating and turning into a dangerous swarm. More importantly, they won't require a massive data center or an uber-powerful computer to do so. On the contrary, the lab claims that these self-replicating AI swarms will need something with as little computing power as an average Internet-connected device, like a smart oven or an Android TV box.

Read more