Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

An accurate ChatGPT watermarking tool may exist, but OpenAI won’t release it

Add as a preferred source on Google
chatGPT on a phone on an encyclopedia
Shantanu Kumar / Pexels

ChatGPT plagiarists beware, as OpenAI has developed a tool that is capable of detecting GPT-4‘s writing output with reportedly 99.99% accuracy. However, the company has spent more than a year waffling over whether or not to actually release it to the public.

The company is reportedly taking a “deliberate approach” due to “the complexities involved and its likely impact on the broader ecosystem beyond OpenAI,” per TechCrunch. “The text watermarking method we’re developing is technically promising, but has important risks we’re weighing while we research alternatives, including susceptibility to circumvention by bad actors and the potential to disproportionately impact groups like non-English speakers,” an OpenAI spokesperson said.

Recommended Videos

The text-watermarking system works by incorporating a specific pattern into the model’s written output that’s detectable to the OpenAI tool ,but invisible to the end user. While this tool can reliably spot the writing generated by its own GPT-4 engine, it cannot detect the outputs of other models like Gemini or Claude. What’s more, the watermark itself can be removed by running the text output through Google Translate, shifting it to another language and then back.

This isn’t OpenAI’s first attempt at building a text-detection tool. Last year, it quietly axed a similar text detector it had in development due to the tool’s paltry detection rate and propensity for false positives. Released in January 2023, that detector needed a user to manually input sample text at least 1,000 characters in length before it could make a determination. It managed to correctly classify AI generated-content with only 26% accuracy and labeled human-generated content as AI-derived 9% of the time. It also led one Texas A&M professor to incorrectly fail an entire class for supposedly using ChatGPT on their final assignments.

OpenAI is also reportedly hesitant to release the tool for fear of a user backlash. Per the Wall Street Journal, 69% of ChatGPT users believe that such a tool would be unreliable and likely result in false accusations of cheating. Another 30% reported they would willingly drop the chatbot in favor of a different model should OpenAI actually roll out the feature. The company also fears developers would be able to reverse engineer the watermark and build tools to negate it.

Even as OpenAI debates the merits of releasing its watermarking system, other AI startups are rushing to release text detectors of their own, including GPTZero, ZeroGPT, Scribbr, and Writer AI Content Detector. However, given their general lack of accuracy, the human eye remains our best method of spotting AI-generated content, which is not reassuring.

Andrew Tarantola
Former Computing Writer
Andrew Tarantola is a journalist with more than a decade reporting on emerging technologies ranging from robotics and machine…
AI companies may be gobbling up old books, and I really hope they aren’t destroying them
Booksellers are seeing mysterious bulk orders for old books, and some suspect AI companies
Book, Publication, Text

Secondhand booksellers have noticed a curious pattern over the past few months. Large orders are coming in for old books that often share no obvious subject, author, or genre, leaving sellers wondering who wants them and why.

According to The Guardian, booksellers in the U.K. and Ireland have received bulk orders covering everything from agricultural texts to racing biographies. Some buyers reportedly use opaque aliases, send orders to the same freight warehouses, and pay full price without negotiating bulk discounts. Similar activity has also surfaced in the U.S., Australia, and Europe.

Read more
Claude is getting ambitious with watermarking, and I can smell the problems from a mile away
Claude’s text watermark could flag AI involvement even when it only helped with translation or editing
Claude website open on laptop

Anthropic wants to make AI-generated text easier to identify, and on paper, I have very little reason to complain. The company is experimenting with an invisible watermark that can be baked directly into text generated by Claude.

It sounds like a sensible idea. AI-generated text is everywhere, and knowing where something came from could certainly help. Moreover, Anthropic isn't simply hiding a marker somewhere inside a document. Its approach changes how Claude selects words to create a statistical pattern that can later be detected.

Read more
I switched from Windows to Mac after 25 years, and it’s the trackpad that converted me.
Well, that rhymes.
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

I’ve been using Windows laptops for almost 25 years. In that time, I never once seriously thought of buying a MacBook. In fact, I can honestly say I had never used one at all until I bought my MacBook Air M5 six months ago. Never borrowed one for a weekend, spent an afternoon at an Apple Store, or even played with one at a friend's house. Macs, to me, were just expensive computers for those who edited videos, made logos, or liked drinking expensive coffee.

My change came completely by accident.

Read more