Skip to main content

Updated: Smart City fined after blocking Wi-Fi hotspots at convention centers

company blocks personal wi fi hotspots is slapped with big fine version 1439970407 shutterstock 193779767
Ditty_about_summer/Shutterstock
Update: Smart City’s President Mark Haley has issued a statement on the company’s behalf. In it, Haley claims Smart City didn’t admit liability and the FCC never found sufficient evidence that would suggest Smart City violated any laws.

Although he admits to jamming personal Wi-Fi hotspot signals, this practice apparently only caused the deaunthentication of less than 1% of devices. Though it doesn’t justify Smart City’s behavior, he also pointed out that “these same technologies are widely used by major convention centers across the globe as well as many federal agencies.”

Related Videos

Despite his all-the-cool-kids-were-doing-it attitude, it’s clear that Haley’s company had never committed to any illegal activity, which was the initial concern of our report. However, Smart City did violate FCC rules, although the company was not aware that this “standardized, ‘available out of the box’ technology” was an infraction of the commission’s policy.

Lastly, he says, “Smart City provides free Wi-Fi access to nearly 31 million users a year in public spaces.” This contradicts what was originally said about blocking Wi-Fi signals so that users would opt for its own paid networks, which the FCC said the company had provided in exchange for “substantial fees.”

My guess is that Smart City does offer free Wi-Fi in some of its locations, but also exhibited a paid wireless option. Nonetheless, rather than taking the matter to court, Smart City has decided to “work cooperatively with the FCC” and that it’s “pleased to have resolved this matter,” explaining that “mounting a vigorous defense” would cost the company too much money and too many resources to undergo.

Original Text: The FCC has revealed that it’s fining telecommunications company Smart City for jamming personal hotspots at convention centers.

The fine, which totals a whopping $750,000, is a result of Smart City’s attempts to restrict personal Wi-Fi hotspots in favor of its own paid wireless networks, which the FCC claims the company leases for “substantial fees.”

Like many who were misled before it, Smart City decided it would be a virtuous and completely legal idea to block mobile hotspots, giving attendees no other choice but to cough up $80 a day for its own service.

Obviously, no one in their right mind would be okay with that, so Smart City did what any benevolent service provider would do. It jammed everyone’s signals preventing them from taking advantage of any competing services.

Of course, all of this was completely against the law, so unfortunately for Smart City, its party was shut down early by the FCC, whose Enforcement Bureau chief Travis LeBlanc denounced the practice.

“It is unacceptable for any company to charge consumers exorbitant fees to access the internet,” LeBlanc asserted. “While at the same time blocking them from using their own personal Wi-Fi hotspots to access the Internet.”

Now Smart City has reached a settlement with the FCC, under which Smart City now owes $750,000 along with an agreement to abstain from hotspot-jamming activities from here on out.

This occurrence ensues from allegations received by the FCC last year which claimed Smart City was blocking personal hotspots in its convention centers. Unsurprisingly, these turned out to be true.

The moral of the story? It doesn’t pay to take away people’s Wi-Fi. In fact, as Smart City has gracefully demonstrated, it costs a great deal.

Editors' Recommendations

Apple scrubs most mentions of controversial CSAM features after iOS 15.2 update
Photo editing on the iPhone 13 Pro.

Apple this week released iOS 15.2 with a host of new features, including a communication safety feature for the Messages app that's focused on child protection. However, the company did not include its controversial iCloud Photos child sexual abuse material scanning feature and has appeared to have scrubbed all mention of its existence.

By way of recap, iOS 15.2 was originally intended to come with a child sexual abuse material (CSAM) detection feature. The update would have implemented an on-device scanning feature aimed at sweeping through a user's iCloud photo library for CSAM material. The company noted that it would do this on-device, for maximum privacy. Privacy experts objected, noting that the very concept of scanning a user's photo library for prohibited material was a privacy violation in itself, one that could expand to include other material once the precedent had been set.

Read more
The South Korean smart home hack is the stuff of nightmares
Hands on a laptop.

Over the weekend, Korean media reported that a group of unidentified hackers had recorded and distributed photo and video files from the smart home security devices of over 700 apartment complexes.

South Korea is known for having a well-connected broadband and wireless network system where it is common for Internet of Things (IoT) devices to be installed in residences. IoT devices are your everyday objects and intelligent devices that connect to the internet, such as smart lighting, smart vacuum cleaners, and smart security systems -- those devices that you can control using your voice or phone. At the heart of most of these residences is a wall pad, which is a keypad attached to the wall and is the central hub of all the IoT devices in the home. The wall pad can activate, control, and monitor all the smart devices in the house.

Read more
Ring’s Neighbors app gets more transparent with latest update
amazon drops the price for ring video doorbell 2 and throws in an echo dot with 4

Ring's Neighbors app is a tremendous add-on for Ring product owners but is also available for free on any iOS or Android device. Built from the ground up, the Neighbors service allows users to receive and post safety information with one another, in addition to public safety agencies that serve those communities. Utilizing posted content from regular Neighbors users and law enforcement agencies, the app offers a massive peace-of-mind solution by keeping communities informed and connected -- although, the means by which law enforcement has used the service to solicit information from users has been a point of contention.

Up until now, police, fire, and other investigative public services have had the ability through Ring to request device owners to send recorded video to investigative units with a Neighbors function called Video Requests. During community investigations, device owners would receive private emails from law enforcement seeking surveillance footage from their Ring hardware -- a solicitation that Ring owners could choose to accept or ignore. By changing privacy settings, users could also completely opt out of Video Requests altogether.

Read more