Skip to main content

Is cyber-sickness a 21st century plague?

cybersickness 2358995244 f6f385d0cf b
Kelly B
If you are one of the many that has felt physically sick after playing a video game, you will understand this phenomenon. It’s called digital motion sickness and cybersickness, and it’s real. Medical and media experts have stated that its becoming increasingly common. A number of symptoms indicate you might be affected by this condition, including a sense of nausea, dizziness, and a dull headache. It is pretty similar to motion sickness, which is experienced typically on a boat, an airplane, or in a moving car.

The culprit behind all this is a mismatch between your senses. In normal motion sickness, your body feels movement in the muscles, joints, and within the inner ear. However, your vision doesn’t observe this same movement. With digital motion sickness, the opposite is true. Your eyes perceive motion, and your body doesn’t. That is followed by a feeling of wooziness, and things might get worse from there.

One psychologist, Cyriel Diels, calls it “a natural response to an unnatural environment.” He also says that the issue has “kind of been swept under the carpet in the tech industry.”

According to a number of studies, the sickness can affect between 50 percent and 80 percent of people. Research also shows anecdotal correlation between males and females in that females appear to be more susceptible to the condition, especially if they have a health history that includes migrations or concussions. Aside from these observances, the word is that it can happen to anyone, even to people who don’t normally suffer from motion sickness.

The phenomenon is so well-known that someone put up a website called You’ll find ratings there that will warn you on how physically sick a movie might make you. The virtual reality company, Oculus VR (a child company to Facebook) has gone so far as saying digital motion sickness is one of their biggest challenges. In fact, some people are worried about the vision and balance effects of extended virtual reality sessions on driving, handling machinery, and other critical situations.

Editors' Recommendations

John Casaretto
Former Digital Trends Contributor
John is the founder of the security company BlackCert, a provider of SSL digital certificates and encryption products. A…
How 20th century check fraud is helping prevent 21st century data theft

Trusona Wins Best in Show at Finovate 2018

How do you prove you are who you say you are? That might seem like an easy question to answer, but in a world where your most personal of private information can be harvested from your credit agency or social networking account, that ease is a problem. Fraudsters and criminals can also prove they’re you, using surprisingly little information.

Read more
Leap Motion is pioneering how users interface with menus in mixed reality
leap motion ar menu prototype arinterface01

Along with advancing the idea of augmented reality "goggles" that have their own AR headset, Leap Motion may also pioneer a new way to interface with menus in its mixed reality environments. In a new demonstration of a prototype in the works, Leap showed off how its translucent user interface can be moved around, minimized, tapped, touched, and dragged wherever the user wants.

There are a number of aspects of augmented reality that still need a lot of work and experimentation. Although some standards of quality and interaction are coming together, menus are one item that nobody has quite figured out how to do just right yet. Leap Motion, best known for its VR hand trackers, is taking steps to figure this out though and its newest demo could point to a future where the headset wearer controls the interface just as much as the interface controls the augmented environment.

Read more
Leap Motion’s prototype augmented reality headset includes hand tracking
leap motion augmented reality hmd prototype revealed ar headset

Leap Motion just revealed a new prototype headset that mixes hand tracking with augmented reality. The device, dubbed as North Star, relies on ellipsoidal reflectors, which are typically sections cut from a larger, curved ellipsoid mirror. In this case, the reflectors are based on optical-grade acrylic coated with a thin layer of silver.
For the first version of Leap Motion's prototype, the company mounted these reflectors inside a huge head-mounted device seemingly ripped out of a 1980s mad scientist movie. On each side of the helmet's inner wall was a 5.5-inch LCD panel along with bulky ribbon cables connecting to display drivers mounted on the top of the HMD. Needless to say, it wasn't sleek and compact like Microsoft's HoloLens. 
"While it might seem a bit funny, it was perhaps the widest field of view, and the highest-resolution AR system ever made," the company says. "Each eye saw digital content approximately 105 degrees high by 75 degrees wide with a 60 percent stereo overlap, for a combined field of view of 105 degrees by 105 degrees with 1440 × 2560 resolution per eye." 
Sound confusing? Imagine putting on a helmet, and inside you see two reflective surfaces curving outward, with one end connecting close to the bridge of your nose, and the other end extending forward and out. Meanwhile, there is an LCD screen mounted to the left and right of your eyes, reflected on the curved mirrored surface. This provides a huge field of view both horizontally and vertically. 
Eventually, the team whittled the headset down from a mad scientist contraption to something that looks more like a current VR headset. The prototype now relies on two fast-switching 3.5-inch LCD screens manufactured by BOE Displays that are powered by an Analogix display driver. While it has fewer parts than the previous gargantuan prototype, Leap Motion managed to preserve "most" of our natural field of view. 
In its current state, Leap Motion's prototype provides a 1,600 x 1,440 resolution for each eye -- lower than the hulking first-gen model -- running at 120 frames per second. It also sports a field of view "covering over a hundred degrees" with the two screens combined. Meanwhile, the hand-tracking runs at 150 frames per second over a 180- x 180-degree field of view.  
According to the post, the team pulled the reflectors away from the user's face just slightly to make room for a disassembled wide field-of-view camera manufactured by Logitech to record the augmented reality headset in action. But they're still not done -- other refinement tasks include better cable management, better curves, additional room for enclosed electronics and sensors, and more. 
Once Leap Motion makes those refinements, there are other details that could improve the headset's AR experience, such as inward-facing cameras for precise augmented image alignment, face tracking, and eye tracking. Head-mounted ambient light sensors would support 360-degree lighting estimation while directional speakers would provide "discrete" localized audio feedback. Micro-actuators could be used to adjust the displays. 
Leap Motion plans to release this design to the open source community next week.  

Read more