Skip to main content

I tried playing Diablo Immortal on PC, and it was a mistake

Diablo Immortal, Blizzard’s new mobile-first action RPG, is abysmal on PC. The game launched in open beta at the beginning of June for PC and mobile, and I downloaded the PC version to see what all the fuss (and discourse) was about. But I couldn’t stomach the experience for very long.

Although there are hundreds of fantastic mobile games, I prefer to do my gaming at a desk on my PC. Diablo Immortal had a big opportunity to win over the core PC fan base that infamously trashed the game, but the busted PC port shows that Blizzard’s effort was half-hearted at best.

Related Videos

Built for mobile

Diablo Immortal on the iPhone 13 Pro and the Asus ROG Phone 5.
Andy Boxall/Digital Trends

Diablo Immortal is built for mobile first, which is one of the reasons our gaming editor, Giovanni Colantonio, enjoyed the game so much in the first place. From the opening screen that reads “Tap to Play,” it’s clear that Diablo Immortal is a mobile port, not a game you can play across PC and mobile.

That’s an important distinction. Games like Fortnite and Genshin Impact work on PC and mobile, but they’re built specifically for those platforms. Neither of those games have obscenely large menu elements on their PC versions, and they don’t have references to inputs that aren’t even possible on most PCs

A seamless experience is important for a game Blizzard expects players to dump hundreds of hours into (and hundreds of dollars, it turns out), but Diablo Immortal doesn’t go to those lengths. It’s insulting enough to insist that you download the iOS or Android version on every other loading screen, clearly showing where Blizzard wants you to play.

It’s not an inviting experience. Playing Diablo Immortal on PC feels like running an Android app through some bunk emulator on Windows. The Diablo community has made it abundantly clear that it didn’t want an “out of season April Fool’s joke,” and Blizzard’s port to PC rubs salt in the wound.

It looks terrible

Diablo Immortal running on PC.

Diablo Immortal is a mobile game, so I never expected it to look as good as the recent footage we’ve seen on Diablo IVBut I didn’t expect it to look so bad, either. I appreciate that the game comes with an unlocked frame rate and a full range of graphics options on PC, but they still look terrible when maxed out.

The UI is a big pain point. Because Blizzard decided not to update the UI elements, they show up as massive, heavily pixeled icons on PC. I can ignore an ugly menu or two, but Diablo Immortal has a dozen UI elements on screen at any given time, and it’s a game where you’ll be cycling in and out of menus constantly.

All of the graphics settings in the world don’t matter considering you can’t adjust the resolution in Diablo Immortal‘s PC port, either. Hoping to play in 4K? Keep hoping. Even if you crank everything up, you’re still left with heavily pixelated models that were clearly designed to show up on a 10-inch screen, not a 27-inch gaming monitor. To make matters worse: You can adjust resolution on mobile. 

Diablo Immortal never needed to be a beautiful game on PC, but it at least needs to offer some options that aren’t possible on mobile. As it stands now, the mobile version actually has more settings in the graphics department, and that’s downright embarrassing. is a hassle

The Steam Deck running Battle Net launcher and the S22 Ultra running Diablo Immortal.
Andy Zahn / Digital Trends is a reason alone to play Diablo Immortal on your phone and not on PC. If you haven’t had the misfortune of using, consider yourself lucky — it’s a barren DRM platform that’s much more interested in getting you to buy more Blizzard games than it is in you actually playing them.

There was a time when every publisher with a few franchises under its belt had a PC game launcher, but that era is gone. EA has moved most of its library to Steam, Bethesda killed its launcher, and Ubisoft has had to offer a massive back catalog and an attractive subscription service to keep its launcher relevant. But not Blizzard.

We’ve seen that shift because, frankly, Steam and Epic Games are better. You have access to features like screenshots, library management, DLC, and achievements. Maybe if Diablo Immortal launched on Steam, it would even actually work on the Steam Deck.

Blizzard clearly recognizes that fact, too. The mobile port includes a video capture feature, for example, which isn’t available in the PC version. And you can try the game out as a guest on mobile, while you have to download and create a account to even start installing the game on PC.

When too much is not enough

Diablo Immortal on a PC monitor.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

It seems obvious to me that Blizzard intended on releasing a PC port of Diablo Immortal to appease the core PC fan base, but it hurts the game overall. A bad PC port means that people like me, who don’t use their phones for gaming, are completely disinterested in engaging with the game.

A better approach would have been to release the mobile version and work on an updated PC port. In its current state, it’s better to hook your phone up to a monitor than to play Diablo Immortal‘s PC port.

Editors' Recommendations

I finally gave PC gaming a shot. Here’s why I’m a true believer now
HyperX Cloud Alpha Wireless headset leaning against a gaming PC.

As long as I've been a gamer, I've always stuck with home consoles. From the NES to the PlayStation 5, consoles were always my gaming home base, and I was happy with the convenience of it. When it comes to PC gaming, though, I've always watched from afar, jealous of the buttery-smooth frame rates and graphics, but intimidated by the parts, drivers, settings, and prices.

But the time had come. I needed a new PC anyways, and I was ready to see if everything the PC Master Race folks preached really lived up to the hype. As it turns out, being told what PC gaming had to offer didn't make me a believer -- but feeling it for myself did the trick.
Ready Player 2

Read more
No, The Last of Us PC requirements aren’t changing
Ellie looking concerned.

Sony Interactive Entertainment (SIE) released an updated PC requirement chart for The Last of Us Part One on Monday, clarifying the system requirements players will need if they want to play the game when it launches on March 28. Some reports claim that the PC requirements have been downgraded, but they haven't; if anything, the port calls for a slightly more powerful system.

The original PC requirements (below) called for a Radeon RX 5800 XT at the Recommended tier, which is to run the game at 1080p with 60 frames per second (fps). The updated requirements call for an RX 5700 XT instead. That sounds like a downgrade, but AMD never released an RX 5800 XT -- it was a typo. You don't need to look further than the next GPU recommendation to see that, which is an AMD "Radeom" RX 6600 XT. The updated requirements have fixed that typo, as well.

Read more
Happy birthday, Steam Deck: console and PC gamers debate its first year
Factorio running on a Steam Deck.

As the Steam Deck’s one-year anniversary approached, I found myself itching to write a reflection on my past 12 months with it. Though I love the gaming device and use it as much as my Nintendo Switch, I initially found my feelings skewing more negative than I expected. Part of that may have been a little reactionary, as I’ve developed a pet peeve in the past year: hearing people who work in games tout it as a “life-changing” device. Sure, it’s life-changing for anyone whose job hinges on having easy access to games, but some of the Steam Deck’s more frustrating quirks make it harder to recommend to a casual player.

My perspective changed when I chatted with Jacob Roach. Digital Trends’ Computing senior staff  writer. As a PC gamer, his read on the system was entirely different from mine, focusing on game-changing features that I haven’t gotten much use out of. What became clear from that conversation is that the Steam Deck is a very different device depending on whether you’re coming at it from a PC or console background.

Read more