Don’t try this $3 app that makes your MacBook moan, but I know you want to

This absurd $3 Mac app went viral for all the wrong reasons

By Vikhyaat Vivek Published March 27, 2026

Computer, Electronics, Laptop, MacBook — SlapMac app SlapMac

There are useful apps, there are pointless app,s and then there is SlapMac, which sits in a category all by itself.

This app has gone viral online for one very stupid (and fun) reason: it makes your MacBook play sound effects when you slap it. Just spank your Mac and hear it moan, fart, or throw punches. The app creator has apparently made $5,000 in just three days, which is what makes the story even more absurd.

How does it work?

SlapMac reportedly uses the MacBook’s motion sensors to detect impact, then responds with a sound effect when the laptop is hit. There are currently eight voice packs to choose from. The develop said the whole thing was built in 48 hours, including the Swift app, landing page, and licensing setup. It was initially put up for $5, and sales apparently kicked off immediately, with no signs of slowing down. The tiny paid MacOS app is currently selling for just $3, and growing in popularity as a joke.

It has even more features now

What really pushes this into cursed-tech territory is that SlapMac apparently isn’t stopping at the base gag. The develop is actively working on this software, adding extra features like USB Moaner, which does exactly what you think it does. The app even lets you adjust the sensitivity, set a cooldown timer, and offers a lifetime slap counter if you want hard data on how often you’ve assaulted your computer.

Recommended Videos

So it has evolved beyond a meme, becoming a proper product with a genuine roadmap.

There is no practical reason for SlapMac to exist, and that is exactly why it took off so fast. It is silly, juvenile, and most importantly, mildly amusing. So no, you probably should not try the app that makes your MacBook moan… wink.

Vikhyaat Vivek is a tech journalist and reviewer with seven years of experience covering consumer hardware, with a focus on…

Topics

Computing

I spent a fortune on a Copilot+ PC, and I’ve barely ever touched Microsoft’s AI

Microsoft needs to give Copilot+ PC owners a reason to use Copilot

Copilot

There is a dedicated Copilot key on my ASUS Zenbook 14 OLED. Months after buying the laptop, it may be one of the least important keys on the entire keyboard. My Zenbook UM3406 runs on AMD’s Ryzen AI 300 series processor, complete with a dedicated NPU offering up to 50 TOPS of AI performance. That qualifies it as a Copilot+ PC, which makes it a part of what Microsoft once described as the new era for Windows.

AI is already a regular part of my workday. I use it for research, brainstorming, and working through ideas. But rather than relying on something built into the Windows OS, I've relied on the likes of ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

Computing

I bought into a brighter future, but my digital life bills monthly subscriptions

My day runs on streaming, cloud storage, AI, transport, and smart devices. None of it feels expensive until I realize almost nothing is ever fully paid for

Light, Adult, Female

Before I’ve properly started the day, several companies have already clocked in. Spotify or YouTube Premium handles the music, Google One keeps my files available, and an AI subscription is waiting in another tab to help me work faster.

Most of these charges earn their place. They save time, remove friction, and keep the day moving. I barely notice them until I think about what would stop working if one payment didn’t go through.

Computing

What happens when AI detectors fail? Researchers say we must be trained to spot fake AI faces

Researchers say spotting AI faces may soon depend more on people than software

Zuckerberg Deepfake

Artificial intelligence has become remarkably good at creating fake human faces. So good, in fact, that the old tricks people relied on - counting fingers, spotting warped earrings, or looking for distorted backgrounds - are quickly becoming obsolete. According to a new study highlighted by the BBC, the next line of defence may not be a better AI detector at all. It might simply be a better-trained human.

Researchers from the University of Aberdeen, working alongside Australia's National University, found that people can dramatically improve their ability to distinguish AI-generated faces from real ones after a relatively short period of structured training. Instead of hunting for obvious visual glitches, participants were taught to recognise subtle patterns that modern image generators still struggle to replicate consistently.