Skip to main content

First Intel Core M benchmark scores released

three generations intel hd graphics tested version 1438873582 core m broadwell yl package diagonal
Less than a week ago, Intel offered the world more details about Core M, a family of fan-less CPUs that could pave the way for thinner, lighter laptops and tablets. On top of increased portability, Intel said that Core M will also provide improved performance and efficiency over both external competitors, and previous-generation low-power Intel Core chips.

Now, some of the earliest Core M benchmarks have been released, and here’s what they say.

Related: Intel’s Core M CPU opens the door for thinner, lighter, fan-less PCs

According to Hot Hardware, Intel’s Core M 5Y70 CPU (which were running inside some of the devices revealed during IFA 2014) earned a score of 2.48 in Cinebench’s multi-core CPU test. In the same test, Hot Hardware’s own numbers indicate that AMD’s A10 Micro-6700T processor earned a mark of 1.5 in the same test. Intel’s own Atom Z3770 chip got 1.47, and the Intel Core i3-2377M got 1.43.

Now for some GPU scores. In Cinebench’s OpenGL graphics test, the Intel Core M 5Y70 and its Intel HD 5300 GPU got 16.96 fps. The AMD 6700T got 11.32fps, the Core i3-2377M got 7.56fps, and the Intel Atom Z3770 got 5.8fps. The chip that mounted the strongest challenge to Intel’s Core M graphics score is AMD’s A4-5000 chip, which got 13.06fps in the same test.

Related: Lenovo ThinkPad Helix hands-on

These early numbers tell us that Intel Core M, and specifically the 5Y70, offers significantly better performance when compared to competition from AMD, and Intel’s own low-power alternatives as well.

We can’t wait to get a Core M system in our hands so we can run our own tests though. Plus, as part of the whole package, we need to evaluate battery life to determine whether Core M offers both better performance and increased endurance, as the company claims.

Thankfully, we won’t have to wait too long to do either. Intel Core M-based systems will start shipping out this fall.

Editors' Recommendations

Konrad Krawczyk
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Konrad covers desktops, laptops, tablets, sports tech and subjects in between for Digital Trends. Prior to joining DT, he…
These weird Intel Raptor Lake benchmarks make us question what’s coming
Intel Raptor Lake chip shown in a rendered image.

With Intel Raptor Lake now on the horizon, the first benchmarks of the upcoming processors are starting to appear. Today, the mid-range Core i5-13600K was put to the test and compared to its successful Alder Lake predecessor, the Core i5-12600K.

The benchmarks returned ... weird results. The Core i5-13600K blows its predecessor out of the water with an 80% improvement, but it also falls flat in another test with a 26% downgrade. What does this mean for the Raptor Lake lineup?

Read more
Intel Arc A770M and A550M compete with Nvidia in benchmarks
An Intel Arc Alchemist laptop with the Arc logo displayed.

Intel Arc Alchemist still has a few cards up its sleeves. We've seen some of the entry-level lineup so far, both in mobility and desktop forms, but we've yet to see much of the flagships. Today, that changes -- synthetic benchmarks of the Arc A770M and the A550M have just leaked, giving us a glimpse of what these graphics cards can do in a gaming laptop.

Much like before, Intel Arc Alchemist did a decent job in benchmarks, trading blows with Nvidia's entry-to-mid-range GPUs. Now, the question is: Can it do equally well in real-world scenarios?

Read more
Intel serves up new benchmarks for Arc Alchemist, but can you trust them?
An Intel Arc Alchemist laptop with the Arc logo displayed.

Intel has released official benchmarks for its Arc Alchemist mobile graphics cards, the A730M and the A770M. Found in a reviewer's guide, these benchmarks claim that the A730M is faster than the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Ti mobile and the A770M is faster than the RTX 3060 mobile.

While that sounds great on paper, the circumstances in which these results were achieved prompt the question -- can you really trust them?
Intel seems to have Nvidia beat

Read more