Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Google helps mortgage scammers con needy homeowners, study finds

Add as a preferred source on Google

consumer-watchdogGoogle ads has become a favorite way for mortgage scammers to prey on homeowners seeking assistance in these troubled times, a study by non-profit public interest group Consumer Watchdog finds. The problem has become so rampant that the group has asked the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to prevent Google from hosting the ads.

“Because Google so far has turned a blind eye to these fraudsters, perhaps because of the substantial revenue such advertising can generate, perhaps because of the substantial revenue such advertising can generate,” wrote John M. Simpson, director of Consumer Watchdog’s Inside Google Project, in a letter to FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz, “we ask that the FTC investigate Google’s role as a facilitator of deceptive and fraudulent advertising and act to prevent the Internet giant from continuing its harmful behavior.”

Recommended Videos

According to the group’s study, Google ads is often used by foreclosure rescue firms that are or have been under investigation for fraud, or ones that are currently trying to falsely imply to potential customers that they are affiliated with the U.S. government.

Other sketchy characters on Google ads include spammers who are simply trying to squeeze information out of struggling mortgage holders, and then sell this information to other Internet marketing firms.

In order to curb the abusive activity on Google ads, Consumer Watchdog has proposed five recommendations:

• Google should be more diligent in screening advertising in areas such as mortgage modification and credit repair where fraud is known to be a serious problem. If the company finds that screening ads is not feasible, it should ban all advertising in areas where regulatory agencies have shown that fraudulent advertising is endemic.

• Where fraud is a known problem but legitimate firms also operate, Google should use its advertising techniques to post public service ads that counter deceptive ads. For example, if a loan modification ad refers to the federal government, a Google-sponsored disclosure statement should appear prominently alongside to warn consumers that they should be wary of mortgage lenders using such terms.

• Google should initiate and help set industry-wide standards to prevent fraudulent advertising on the Internet.

• Google should donate revenue it has received from questionable financial advertising to non-profit groups that help consumers with credit problems, including homeowners seeking to avoid foreclosure.

• The Federal Trade Commission should begin using its legal authority under the Lanham Act to seek injunctions against search providers who accept large inventories of advertising from firms they have reason to believe are engaged in deceptive practices.

Consumer Watchdog, which describes itself as nonpartisan, says Google isn’t alone in accepting dubious advertisers — Microsoft’s Bing and Yahoo! are also guilty, they say.

The group hopes that, by persuading Google to change its policy towards these unscrupulous companies, it will set the “gold standard for privacy for the industry,” and greatly reduce the number of people defrauded by these types of rackets.

Read the full study here: PDF. Read the full letter to the FTC here: PDF.

Andrew Couts
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
Topics
I spent a fortune on a Copilot+ PC, and I’ve barely ever touched Microsoft’s AI
Microsoft needs to give Copilot+ PC owners a reason to use Copilot
Copilot

There is a dedicated Copilot key on my ASUS Zenbook 14 OLED. Months after buying the laptop, it may be one of the least important keys on the entire keyboard. My Zenbook UM3406 runs on AMD’s Ryzen AI 300 series processor, complete with a dedicated NPU offering up to 50 TOPS of AI performance. That qualifies it as a Copilot+ PC, which makes it a part of what Microsoft once described as the new era for Windows.

AI is already a regular part of my workday. I use it for research, brainstorming, and working through ideas. But rather than relying on something built into the Windows OS, I've relied on the likes of ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini.

Read more
I bought into a brighter future, but my digital life bills monthly subscriptions
My day runs on streaming, cloud storage, AI, transport, and smart devices. None of it feels expensive until I realize almost nothing is ever fully paid for
Light, Adult, Female

Before I’ve properly started the day, several companies have already clocked in. Spotify or YouTube Premium handles the music, Google One keeps my files available, and an AI subscription is waiting in another tab to help me work faster.

Most of these charges earn their place. They save time, remove friction, and keep the day moving. I barely notice them until I think about what would stop working if one payment didn’t go through.

Read more
What happens when AI detectors fail? Researchers say we must be trained to spot fake AI faces
Researchers say spotting AI faces may soon depend more on people than software
Zuckerberg Deepfake

Artificial intelligence has become remarkably good at creating fake human faces. So good, in fact, that the old tricks people relied on - counting fingers, spotting warped earrings, or looking for distorted backgrounds - are quickly becoming obsolete. According to a new study highlighted by the BBC, the next line of defence may not be a better AI detector at all. It might simply be a better-trained human.

Researchers from the University of Aberdeen, working alongside Australia's National University, found that people can dramatically improve their ability to distinguish AI-generated faces from real ones after a relatively short period of structured training. Instead of hunting for obvious visual glitches, participants were taught to recognise subtle patterns that modern image generators still struggle to replicate consistently.

Read more