Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Here’s how Google Search plans to tackle clickbait

Add as a preferred source on Google

Because Google knows that we all hate clickbait, the company will soon be taking steps to tackle this problem in Google search results. Starting globally next week for searches using English, Google will aim to reduce the ranking for offending websites while simultaneously rewarding those that create original, high-quality content.

A laptop rests on a bench outside with google search open on-screen.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Clickbait is often seen in advertisements that make bold or even outrageous claims in the hopes that you’ll be intrigued enough to click the ad so you can learn more. Search results can also be misleading and inspire a click based on an interesting title and snippet.

Recommended Videos

Of course, finding that information or anything relevant to your search on the clickbait page might be impossible. Scrolling through the page, you’ll pass by several more ads, giving the unscrupulous marketer and web developer exactly what they wanted. Known as blackhat SEO, it’s a massive waste of your time and incredibly frustrating to get drawn in by this trick.

Improving search results to show more useful content sounds great, but achieving this isn’t easy and Google has been refining its search engine continuously since it first launched in 1997. After more than two decades, here’s how Google Search intends to reach the next level and show even more accurate and valuable results.

Websites that collect together results from others, for example, movie reviews from multiple sources, but that don’t add anything new, will be ranked lower. Instead, your search for information about the movie “Wakanda Forever” is more likely to give results that link to new information and original commentary about the upcoming blockbuster. The improvement will be most noticeable in searches related to online education, arts and entertainment, shopping, and technology, according to Google.

This means aggregators like Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic could hold less weight in search results compared to original reviews. This update seems to primarily target reviews, as well as content that “seems like it was designed to attract clicks rather than inform readers.”

The update seems targeted at bots as well. Although Google didn’t explicitly state how it plans to tackle content written by bots (or copied from another website), the company says the impetus for this update is content that “might not have the insights you want, or it may not even seem like it was created for, or even by, a person.”

Google didn’t detail in its blog post how it ferrets out the deceptive websites, but it has plenty of data and machine learning resources to analyze searches and visits to particular websites versus the amount of time spent there after clicking through. How big of an impact this will have remains to be seen, but any improvement is welcome.

Alan Truly
Alan Truly is a Writer at Digital Trends, covering computers, laptops, hardware, software, and accessories that stand out as…
Look, the MacBook Neo is a fine machine for building apps. And yes, I am utterly surprised
I am talking about apps with a generous dose of AI wizardry happening in the background.
MacBook Neo in yellow.

In a span of just one week, I have built a full-fledged Android app for my Galaxy Z Fold 8 foldable phone, three Mac apps, and an iPhone app. And here's the fun part. The entire journey of creating these apps actually started on a phone, jumped to my MacBook Neo, compiled just fine, and ran flawlessly, without making me want to tear my hair off. The latest example? 

It built my calendar-clipboard hybrid app in Terminal within 20 seconds, and an on-device transcription app with a retro look in roughly 15 seconds. I used to think building desktop software would have me burning the midnight oil. The MacBook Neo did it in less time than I can pour myself a can of soda and take the first sip. 

Read more
AI could be doing to our tolerance for hard work what social media did to our patience
Even brief AI use may make unaided work feel more frustrating once the help disappears.
ChatGPT on iPhone

It is no secret that social media, and especially the rise of short-form content, has played a major role in the declining patience many of us have for anything that takes too long to get to the point. A few seconds without something interesting happening is enough to make us swipe away and look for the next thing. AI appears to be doing something similar to the way we approach work.

A new peer-reviewed study found that people who used AI for around 10 to 15 minutes were more likely to struggle and give up once the AI was taken away. The researchers ran three randomized experiments with 1,222 participants who were given math and reading-comprehension tasks. AI helped them perform better at first, but their performance tanked once they had to solve the problems on their own.

Read more
Microsoft wants Copilot Notebooks to handle the work that comes after an AI answer
Built-in Office editing gives users somewhere to revise what Copilot produces
Copilot graphics

Microsoft is bringing Office editing into Copilot Notebooks through its Frontier preview. Users can work on Word, Excel and PowerPoint files alongside their project references, making changes themselves or asking Copilot to handle them.

Generating a report or presentation with AI still leaves someone responsible for getting it ready to share. The October update puts editing tools where that work begins, though having a document neatly formatted doesn’t make its contents correct.

Read more