Skip to main content

Intel’s budget Core i3-12100 outperformed AMD’s Ryzen 5 3600 in many games

The Intel Alder Lake generation of processors is expanding, adding entry-level options into the mix. One such processor is the budget Core i3-12100.

The CPU has been benchmarked in several games, giving an accurate portrayal of its gaming prowess. It was also tested against the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 CPU. Surprisingly, the entry-level option from Intel managed to defeat its AMD rival.

Render of Intel Alder Lake chip.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Art of PC reviewed and tested the new Intel Core i3-12100, naming it “the new ultra-budget gaming king.” Considering the benchmark results, the CPU seems to deserve that flattering title. The Core i3-12100 comes as a successor to the Intel Core i3-10100, which to this day remains one of the best budget CPUs.

Recommended Videos

It represents a huge leap forward, giving access to DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5.0. While most users on a budget won’t want to take advantage of the currently massively overpriced access to DDR5 RAM, it does give this inexpensive CPU a bit more longevity and the option for future upgrades.

The CPU arrives as part of Intel Alder Lake, a generation full of hybrid processors, but this model does not feature a mix of efficiency and performance cores. Instead, the Core i3-12100 sports four cores and eight threads, and all of the cores are of the Golden Cove (performance) variety. It has a base clock speed of 3.3GHz that can be boosted up to 4.3GHz.

The lack of a hybrid core setup does put the budget Core i3 at a disadvantage in comparison to its older Core i5 and Core i7 siblings, but it still managed to perform excellently in the benchmarks. According to Art of PC, the processor turned out to be a surprisingly competitive entry, given its modest $130 price tag.

Art of PC put together a good gaming setup to test the new processor on. The rig includes an Nvidia RTX 3080 graphics card, 32GB of 3600MHz DDR4 memory, an Asus ROG Strix Z690-A D4 motherboard, and an extra CPU cooler in the form of a bequiet! Dark Rock Pro 4. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600 setup Intel was tested against was identical, with the exception of the motherboard: The Ryzen setup used an Asus ROG X570 Crosshair VII Hero.

Intel Core i3-12100 benchmark results.
Image credit: Art of PC Image used with permission by copyright holder

The testers revealed the average frames per second (fps) achieved by both setups. The Core i3-12100 rig was hitting high frames even in demanding games, such as Cyberpunk 2077 (108 fps) and Microsoft Flight Simulator (66). Of course, the rest of the system plays a part in that, as the RTX 3080 alone can be a massive boost to frame rates. However, these two titles are notoriously CPU-heavy, and the Core i3-12100 still delivered high levels of performance.

Intel Core i3-12100 outperformed the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 processor by an average of 7.85%. It managed to hit higher fps in every single game it was tested in. The Ryzen 5 3600 has two more cores and four more threads compared to the Core i3-12100, which makes this nearly 8% victory all the more impressive.

With benchmark results such as these, Intel’s new entry-level processor will certainly find its way onto many best processor rankings. For gamers on a tighter budget, it makes for a good alternative to its more powerful 12th-gen Intel siblings.

Monica J. White
Monica is a computing writer at Digital Trends, focusing on PC hardware. Since joining the team in 2021, Monica has written…
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more
This is the one gaming CPU I recommend over the Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Pads on the bottom of the Ryzen 9 7950X.

AMD's new Ryzen 7 9800X3D is already one of the best processors you can buy. It delivers productivity and gaming gains across the board, though not in equal strides. Despite the improvements AMD made, the last-gen Ryzen 7 7800X3D is still potent competition, particularly when it comes to gaming.

These are two of the go-to gaming CPUs right now, and although the Ryzen 7 9800X3D is newer and faster, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is still the right CPU for most people. That becomes clear when you look at the main focus of these CPUs -- gaming performance -- and how prices are starting to settle.
Specs and pricing

Read more
I tested the Ryzen 7 9800X3D against the Core Ultra 9 285K. It’s not even close
The bottom of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D.

AMD's hotly anticipated Ryzen 7 9800X3D is finally here, and I'll tell you right away that it's one of the best processors you can buy. It introduces AMD's next-gen 3D V-Cache tech, and it dominates in games. But there's still plenty of competition coming from Intel.

The recent Core Ultra 9 285K offers more cores and higher speeds overall, and although it's a flagship CPU, the price increase on the Ryzen 7 9800X3D means the two CPUs are closer than ever in price. I threw them on the test bench to see which CPU comes out ahead, and the race wasn't nearly as tight as I thought it would be.
Specs and pricing

Read more