Skip to main content

Intel and AMD are back in the game

After all the hype around Copilot+ PCs and the Qualcomm Snapdragon Elite X chips that power them, many have been wondering about the extent of Intel and AMD’s response — and how well they’d be able to pull it off. Well, with the announcement of HP’s AMD Ryzen AI 300-powered OmniBook and Asus’ first Intel Lunar Lake laptop, we have at least one of our answers.

Just a month or so after the release of the first Copilot+ PCs, new Intel and AMD-powered AI PCs have been announced and they’ll be ready to run Copilot+ features — as soon as Microsoft lets them. The first, the HP OmniBook Ultra, will go on sale in August and — on the outside — is very similar looking to last month’s Snapdragon-powered OmniBook X. It has the same 14-inch display and a very similar chassis, but the chip on the inside is very different.

Recommended Videos

With 55 TOPS (trillion operations per second) of AI performance, the Ryzen AI 300 processor beats Qualcomm’s 45 TOPS NPU — but we all know that’s not what’s really important. As an x86 chip, the Ryzen can run any app or game you could want on Windows without having to worry about emulation, but the real question is — how long can it run them for in terms of battery life?

A rendering of the Asus ExpertBook P5 on a white background.
Asus

Setting AI aside for a moment, the other big point of interest with the Snapdragon chips is their Arm architecture and the massive battery life improvements it provides. Some surveys are even suggesting it’s the battery life that’s truly driving Copilot+ PC sales in the first place.

If AMD can’t match Qualcomm’s power efficiency, or at least substantially improve on their own older chips, it could be a bit of a hard sell. Just imagine people making the decision between two Windows laptops that have almost the same AI capabilities, but one can last many hours longer than the other. The choice is painfully obvious.

The exact same problem could play to Intel, perhaps even more so since it usually loses out to AMD’s mobile chips in terms of battery performance. Asus’ new Lunar Lake laptop, the ExpertBook P5, doesn’t actually namedrop the processor in the currently released specs. But considering its 45+ TOPS, most people have already agreed that the “next-generation Intel Core Ultra” inside this laptop could only be Lunar Lake. With its 2.5K 144Hz display, military-grade aluminum chassis, and up to 3TB of storage, the laptop has plenty to offer.

Once Microsoft releases the software update that allows non-Qualcomm PCs to run Copilot+ features, there won’t be a lot of differences between the AI experiences these PCs offer. That’s why the battery life instead might become the deciding factor for a lot of buyers — so we’re waiting with bated breath for more details and benchmarks.

Willow Roberts
Willow Roberts has been a Computing Writer at Digital Trends for a year and has been writing for about a decade. She has a…
It’s official: AMD beats Intel in gaming laptops
Two Zephyrus G16 laptops sitting next to each other.

We are constantly making comparisons between AMD and Intel when reviewing some of the best gaming laptops on the market. Just like desktops, we're trying to find which company makes the best processor you can buy. It's never a perfect comparison, though. Differences between the thermal design and build quality of laptops make it next to impossible to truly get a one-to-one comparison. Now, we finally have the chance for that comparison.

Asus sent out its new ROG Zephyrus G16 equipped with one of AMD's new Zen 5 CPUs, giving us a chance to compare it to the Intel-based ROG Zephyrus G16 we reviewed earlier this year. I didn't expect a big difference in performance given that these two laptops are basically identical. Boy, was I wrong.
A rare opportunity

Read more
AMD didn’t even need its best CPU to beat Intel
A render of a Ryzen 9000 CPU.

Looks like the competition between AMD and Intel is about to start heating up again. AMD's upcoming second-best processor, the Ryzen 9 9900X, was just spotted in an early benchmark -- and the results are shockingly good. If this is what AMD can do with a 12-core CPU, what's going to happen when the 16-core version of Zen 5 appears in tests?

The happy news (for AMD fans, at least) comes directly from the Geekbench 6.2 database, and it all comes down to a benchmark of what appears to be a retail sample of the Ryzen 9 9900X. The chip scored an impressive 3,401 points in the single-core score, and 19,756 points in the multi-core score. That puts it far above its predecessor, the Ryzen 9 7900X, but that's not its only success.

Read more
AMD’s new Ryzen AI 300 chips look like the real deal
AMD's CEO delivering the Computex 2024 presentation.

The pressure is on at Computex this year. With the May announcement of Copilot+ PCs and Microsoft's deep partnership with Qualcomm, the stakes were high for AMD coming into the show. But the company certainly didn't show up empty-handed.

Its announcements have all centered around Zen 5, the company's latest architecture, both on desktop and mobile. But at the moment, these mobile chips feels especially noteworthy in light of Copilot+. AMD calls it the Ryzen AI 300 series. It's a complete rebrand for AMD, not unlike Intel's move to "Core Ultra" in its most recent generation. But this time, it's all about AI.

Read more