Skip to main content

Intel’s CPU lineups might get even more confusing

An Intel Core Ultra Series 2 chip embedded in a piece of glass.
Kunal Khullar / Digital Trends

Intel’s list of processors constantly grows, and its whole new naming scheme just got even more confusing. Today’s leaks imply that Intel might be working on another Raptor Lake refresh, this time under the Core 200 name. That’s right — just Core 200, without the Ultra. We also spotted some more budget-friendly, previously unheard-of Arrow Lake chips.

With Intel Arrow Lake right around the corner and Lunar Lake CPUs freshly out and available, Intel’s got a lot going on in the CPU department right now, and there’s more to come. Some non-Ultra Core 200 chips appeared in various Business Applications Performance Corporation (BAPCo) benchmarks, including the Core 7 250U, the Core 7 250H, and the Core 5 220H. There’s also the Core 7 Ultra 255H, which is likely an upcoming Arrow Lake-H CPU set to appear inside next-gen laptops.

Recommended Videos

But what are these non-Ultra CPUs? This is where things get even trickier.

Intel Core 7 250Uhttps://t.co/UgvNAXhzaD

— Everest (@Olrak29_) September 19, 2024

Many might guess that the Core 200-series CPUs are a Meteor Lake refresh. Meteor Lake was launched under the Core Ultra 100-series umbrella, so it kind of makes sense. However, as discovered by VideoCardz, the specs of the CPUs don’t line up with Meteor Lake chips, but rather with Raptor Lake. This would be an interesting choice, seeing as Intel has already given Raptor Lake CPUs a refresh, but that’s what might be happening here.

Refreshing last-gen CPUs is nothing new to Intel, but giving them a strikingly similar naming scheme to next-gen parts might be confusing for some consumers. It wouldn’t be unusual, though, as Intel’s Raptor Lake refresh followed the same pattern, with CPUs such as the Core 3 100U and the Core 5 120U.

Moving on to next-gen chips, CPU-Z just added support for several Arrow Lake processors that are aimed at more budget-conscious users: the Core Ultra 5 235, Core Ultra 5 225, and the Core Ultra 5 225F. The Core Ultra 5 235 is said to come with 14 cores, including six performance cores and eight efficiency cores, as well as a boost clock speed of 5GHz.

Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger presents Intel's roadmap including Arrow Lake, Lunar Lake, and Panther Lake.
Intel

The two Core Ultra 5 225 CPUs are essentially the same chip, but the F model won’t have integrated graphics. As per VideoCardz, both are rumored to feature 10 ores (six P-cores and four E-cores) and a maximum clock speed of 4.9GHz. Unlike the initial Arrow Lake-S lineup, all three of these chips are said to feature a much lower thermal design power (TDP) of 65 watts (down from 125W).

Making sense of these names is increasingly harder, but this is the reality that both laptop and desktop users will just have to get used to. Until Intel itself confirms any of the above, we can’t even be sure all of these chips will make it to market. Intel is expected to announce Arrow Lake-S CPUs on October 10, but even that is yet to be confirmed at this point.

Monica J. White
Monica is a computing writer at Digital Trends, focusing on PC hardware. Since joining the team in 2021, Monica has written…
AMD Ryzen AI claimed to offer ‘up to 75% faster gaming’ than Intel
A render of the new Ryzen AI 300 chip on a gradient background.

AMD has just unveiled some internal benchmarks of its Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor. Although it's been a few months since the release of the Ryzen AI 300 series, AMD now compares its CPU to Intel's Lunar Lake, and the benchmarks are highly favorable for AMD's best processor for thin-and-light laptops. Let's check them out.

For starters, AMD compared the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to the Intel Core Ultra 7 258V. The AMD CPU comes with 12 cores (four Zen 5 and eight Zen 5c cores) and 24 threads, as well as 36MB of combined cache. The maximum clock speed tops out at 5.1GHz, and the CPU offers a configurable thermal design power (TDP) ranging from 15 watts to 54W. Meanwhile, the Intel chip sports eight cores (four performance cores and four efficiency cores), eight threads, a max frequency of 4.8GHz, 12MB of cache, and a TDP ranging from 17W to 37W. Both come with a neural processing unit (NPU), and AMD scores a win here too, as its NPU provides 50 trillion operations per second (TOPS), while Intel's sits at 47 TOPS. It's a small difference, though.

Read more
Intel admits defeat on Arrow Lake — but it’s not down for the count
intel core ultra 5 245k review 4

Intel's Arrow Lake CPUs aren't off to a great start. As you can read in our Core Ultra 9 285K review and Core Ultra 5 245K review, Intel's latest CPUs miss the mark across productivity and gaming apps, and they're miles away from some of the best processors you can buy right now. According to Intel, there are several issues with the new platform that it plans to address within a matter of weeks.

In an interview with HotHardware, Intel's Robert Hallock was blunt about the release of Arrow Lake CPUs: "The launch didn't go as planned ... we have a number of things we got to go fix." Hallock, formerly of AMD, is near the top of Intel's technical marketing division. Although he didn't address exactly what's wrong with Arrow Lake, Hallock promised that Intel is working on updates that could significantly improve performance, and that they'll arrive in a matter of weeks.

Read more
The sales numbers for Intel’s new chips are just depressing
A render for an Intel Arrow Lake CPU.

Intel's latest Arrow Lake-based Core Ultra 200S processors have been off to a rocky debut, receiving middling reviews from hardware testers, including from our own testing.

But according to recent sales data from Mindfactory, Germany’s leading online PC hardware retailer, not a single Core Ultra 200-series CPU has been sold so far. Meanwhile, AMD continues to dominate with 95% of Mindfactory’s CPU market share.

Read more