Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Intel is about to make PC chips even more expensive, and some could vanish altogether

Intel is done competing on price, and its supply chain is warning that your next CPU purchase will cost noticeably more.

Add as a preferred source on Google
MacBook Pro Intel version
Rachit Agarwal / Digital Trends

Intel’s chips are about to get pricier again, and this might not be the last time.

Supply chain sources suggest the company is planning another price hike of roughly 10% starting October 5, 2026. According to a Digitimes report, the company wants to shift from chasing market share through competitive pricing to protecting profit margins. 

Why are prices climbing, and what’s getting cut?

For those catching up, this is the company’s third price hike in under a year. The latest bump follows a ~10% increase in early 2026, then another in July 2026. It could affect the company’s Arrow and Panther Lake processors.

Recommended Videos

The hikes are driven partly by rising supply chain costs and partly by a deliberate shift in the company’s strategy. In addition to increasing prices, Intel is reportedly optimizing its entire lineup for profitability. 

As part of the process, Intel may discontinue low-margin, small-core processors. Mainstream laptops and desktops might not be affected. However, industrial PCs, IoT devices, and integrated systems could lose access to cheap Intel silicon entirely. 

If you haven’t already noticed, these are markets that rely on long product cycles rather than top-tier hardware. This is exactly the kind of gap Arm-based rivals Qualcomm and MediaTek have been waiting for. 

What’s happening behind the scenes?

The company’s leadership has already cut the management layers from twelve down to six (half the original number). It has also trimmed headcount to roughly 75,000. Insiders still suggest another 5 to 10% workforce reduction could follow. 

Meanwhile, Intel’s own factories are reportedly prioritizing higher-margin server chips over PC processors. It’s essentially the same strategy memory makers around the world have been criticized for, one that has already contributed to the global memory crisis. Together, these phenomena could force global PC shipments to fall sharply between 2026 and 2027. 

Intel’s capacity squeeze might push more consumer chip manufacturers toward TSMC, which is already enjoying great volumes from companies like Apple, Qualcomm, and MediaTek. 

If I were planning a PC build or upgrade, I’d buy before October, or hold out for Intel and AMD’s next-generation platforms landing in 2027.

Shikhar Mehrotra
For more than five years, Shikhar has consistently simplified developments in the field of consumer tech and presented them…
Claude can now build live dashboards and animated explainers from your data
Anthropic just launched two new tools in beta: Claude Dashboards and Claude Motion.
claude-dashboard-motions-feature

Staring at a static slide while your presentation needs something more dynamic is a familiar workplace headache. Anthropic just gave Claude two new tools to fix that. Claude Dashboards and Claude Motion are both launching in beta today, letting you turn raw company data into live visuals and static ideas into short animated explainers.

How does Claude Dashboards work?

Read more
Don’t trust AI chatbots to pick your blood pressure monitor, study warns
Before trusting AI about your blood pressure monitor, check an independent validation registry instead first.
blood-pressure-monitor

Asking an AI chatbot whether your blood pressure monitor is actually trustworthy could leave you with a wrong answer. New research presented at the American Heart Association's Hypertension Scientific Sessions 2026 found that popular AI search tools can correctly identify validated monitors only 63-91% of the time, depending on which AI chatbot you use.

AI can identify validated home BP monitors only 2/3 of time

Read more
ChatGPT can imitate a cartoonist. Now it’s signing their name, too
OpenAI’s image generator has put real New Yorker cartoonists’ signatures on cartoons they didn’t draw, confusing readers about who made them
ChatGPT

Brendan Loper started hearing from people who thought he’d drawn a cartoon circulating online. His pen name was on it, but the image had been generated with ChatGPT.

Nieman Lab documented signatures belonging to more than 15 New Yorker contributors on AI-generated cartoons. Those names can give a reposted image a convincing credit line, even when the artist had no hand in making it.

Read more