Skip to main content

Judge rejects Google Books settlement

Google Book Search
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Federal judge Denny Chin has rejected a proposed settlement between Internet titan Google and the publishing industry that would have granted Google a monopoly for digitizing so-called “orphan works,” or books which are still in copyright but for which no author or rights-holder contact information is readily available. Under the controversial settlement plan—known as the Amended Settlement Agreement or ASA— Google would have paid some $125 million and set up a system that would enable rights-holders of orphan works to register with Google and get paid for the use of their work. Judge Chin dismissed that notion, finding that authors’ and publishers’ copyrights completely trump Google’s non-existent right to scan their work, make it available to the world, and earn money by positioning ads around it. Perhaps more important to Judge Chin, however, was that the settlement would give Google a practical monopoly on the book search market.

The controversy over Google Books started almost as soon as Google quietly became its book-scanning project back in 2004. The stated goals of the project are laudable on their face: make digitized copies of books and printed material that, in many cases, is inaccessible to most of the world and mouldering away in libraries, and make that content searchable and accessible to the whole world via the Internet. Google’s Sergey Brin has characterized the Google Books project as a way to secure humanity’s treasure-trove of knowledge from catastrophes like the burning of the Library of Alexandria—Google Books would not only preserve information, but make it more widely available than at any point in human history.

Recommended Videos

However, various coalitions of authors, publishers, and rights-holders—as well as Google competitors—immediately attacked Google Books, noting that Google had not obtained permissions from rights holders to digitize and distribute content. Google worked with the initial collection of opponents—many of whom have conflicting interests themselves—and announced a settlement in 2008 that would enable Google to continue scanning books. The proposed settlement drew still more fire—including objections from the U.S. government, and an Amended Settlement Agreement (ASA) was announced.

The ASA was controversial because it would essentially leverage class-action law to grant Google an exclusive right to scan and distribute in-copyright works. Although authors and rights holders would be able to register with Google to receive royalties for the use of their material—or opt-out entirely—the deal placed the onus on rights holders to pro-actively protect their rights. Moreover, if another company—say, Google or Amazon—wanted to get into the book scanning business, the ASA would prevent it: those companies would have to start over at step one and reach some arrangement of their own before they could even think of trying to compete with Google.

In rejecting the ASA, Judge Chin mostly focused on the anticompetitive aspects of the ASA, noting it would “arguably give Google control over the [book] search market.” Google—and Google alone—would have a special immunity from copyright law to scan, index, and distribute orphan works, while competitors would have no such capability.

However, Judge Chin was not unaware of the copyright implications of the ASA.
“A copyright owner’s right to exclude others from using his property is fundamental and beyond dispute,” Judge Chin wrote in his ruling. “Under the ASA, however, if copyright owners sit back and do nothing, they lose their rights. Absent class members who fail to opt out will be deemed to have released their rights even as to future infringing conduct.”

Google has not yet formally responded to Judge Chin’s denial, although statements distributed via email by Google spokespersons indicate the company is disappointed and reviewing the ruling.

At this point, Google could choose to appeal the ruling and work to have the ASA approved—it was, after all, the result of several years’ negotiation with a diverse set of players—or go back to the drawing board and try to come up with another solution.

Judge Chin’s ruling implies that he would be more inclined to approve a settlement that applied only to authors and rightsholders that chose to accept it. However, being able to digitize only books for which Google can get express permission is precisely what Google was hoping to avoid.

The full text of Judge Chin’s ruling is available via Scribd.

Topics
Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Sundar Pichai says even more AI is coming to Google Search in 2025
Google Search on a laptop

Google will continue to go all in on AI in 2025, CEO Sundar Pichai announced during the company's Q4 earnings call Wednesday. Alphabet shares have since dropped more than 7% on news that the company giant fell short of fourth-quarter revenue expectations and announced an ambitious spending plan for its AI development.

"As AI continues to expand the universe of queries that people can ask, 2025 is going to be one of the biggest years for search innovation yet,” he said during the call. Pichai added that Search is on a “journey” from simply presenting a list of links to offering a more Assistant-like experience. Whether users actually want that, remains to be seen.

Read more
Google has some ‘good ideas’ for putting ads in Gemini
Gemini Advanced on the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold.

Google is exploring adding ads to Gemini AI. CEO Sundar Pichai floated the idea in an earnings call but did not mention a specific date, according to The Verge. He also noted that the company has "very good ideas" about how it could appear in the future.

This year's focus remains on enhancing user experience features and broadening subscription offerings. Pichai noted that advertising has been essential in scaling other Google services, such as YouTube, possibly hinting that ads will eventually come to Gemini. However, Pichai did not mention how Google plans to integrate ads into Gemini when they appear in the AI. He also said they are committed to making the products work and delivering them to a vast audience.

Read more
Google puts military use of AI back on the table
First step of Gemini processing a PDF in Files by Google app.

On February 4, Google updated its “AI principles,” a document detailing how the company would and wouldn’t use artificial intelligence in its products and services. The old version was split into two sections: “Objectives for AI applications” and “AI applications we will not pursue,” and it explicitly promised not to develop AI weapons or surveillance tools.

The update was first noticed by The Washington Post, and the most glaring difference is the complete disappearance of any “AI applications we will not pursue” section. In fact, the language of the document now focuses solely on “what Google will do,” with no promises at all about “what Google won’t do.”

Read more