Skip to main content

Judge rejects Google Books settlement

Google Book Search
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Federal judge Denny Chin has rejected a proposed settlement between Internet titan Google and the publishing industry that would have granted Google a monopoly for digitizing so-called “orphan works,” or books which are still in copyright but for which no author or rights-holder contact information is readily available. Under the controversial settlement plan—known as the Amended Settlement Agreement or ASA— Google would have paid some $125 million and set up a system that would enable rights-holders of orphan works to register with Google and get paid for the use of their work. Judge Chin dismissed that notion, finding that authors’ and publishers’ copyrights completely trump Google’s non-existent right to scan their work, make it available to the world, and earn money by positioning ads around it. Perhaps more important to Judge Chin, however, was that the settlement would give Google a practical monopoly on the book search market.

The controversy over Google Books started almost as soon as Google quietly became its book-scanning project back in 2004. The stated goals of the project are laudable on their face: make digitized copies of books and printed material that, in many cases, is inaccessible to most of the world and mouldering away in libraries, and make that content searchable and accessible to the whole world via the Internet. Google’s Sergey Brin has characterized the Google Books project as a way to secure humanity’s treasure-trove of knowledge from catastrophes like the burning of the Library of Alexandria—Google Books would not only preserve information, but make it more widely available than at any point in human history.

However, various coalitions of authors, publishers, and rights-holders—as well as Google competitors—immediately attacked Google Books, noting that Google had not obtained permissions from rights holders to digitize and distribute content. Google worked with the initial collection of opponents—many of whom have conflicting interests themselves—and announced a settlement in 2008 that would enable Google to continue scanning books. The proposed settlement drew still more fire—including objections from the U.S. government, and an Amended Settlement Agreement (ASA) was announced.

The ASA was controversial because it would essentially leverage class-action law to grant Google an exclusive right to scan and distribute in-copyright works. Although authors and rights holders would be able to register with Google to receive royalties for the use of their material—or opt-out entirely—the deal placed the onus on rights holders to pro-actively protect their rights. Moreover, if another company—say, Google or Amazon—wanted to get into the book scanning business, the ASA would prevent it: those companies would have to start over at step one and reach some arrangement of their own before they could even think of trying to compete with Google.

In rejecting the ASA, Judge Chin mostly focused on the anticompetitive aspects of the ASA, noting it would “arguably give Google control over the [book] search market.” Google—and Google alone—would have a special immunity from copyright law to scan, index, and distribute orphan works, while competitors would have no such capability.

However, Judge Chin was not unaware of the copyright implications of the ASA.
“A copyright owner’s right to exclude others from using his property is fundamental and beyond dispute,” Judge Chin wrote in his ruling. “Under the ASA, however, if copyright owners sit back and do nothing, they lose their rights. Absent class members who fail to opt out will be deemed to have released their rights even as to future infringing conduct.”

Google has not yet formally responded to Judge Chin’s denial, although statements distributed via email by Google spokespersons indicate the company is disappointed and reviewing the ruling.

At this point, Google could choose to appeal the ruling and work to have the ASA approved—it was, after all, the result of several years’ negotiation with a diverse set of players—or go back to the drawing board and try to come up with another solution.

Judge Chin’s ruling implies that he would be more inclined to approve a settlement that applied only to authors and rightsholders that chose to accept it. However, being able to digitize only books for which Google can get express permission is precisely what Google was hoping to avoid.

The full text of Judge Chin’s ruling is available via Scribd.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
How to convert a PowerPoint to Google Slides
Speaker notes in Presenter View in PowerPoint on a Dell monitor.

While PowerPoint is widely used to develop presentations, Google Slides has become a popular alternative. Part of what makes it so popular is that it's free to use, as is other Google software such as Google Docs and Google Sheets – which is a stark contrast to the premium price you'll pay for Microsoft Office and PowerPoint.

If you're looking to jump ship from PowerPoint to Slides, Google makes it easy to do so. In fact, it takes little more than a few clicks to convert a PowerPoint to Google Slides. Whether you need to change the format for a coworker or want to permanently switch to the free platform, here's a look at how to convert your PowerPoint deck into a Google Slides presentation.

Read more
Best Buy has a refurbished MacBook for $580, and it’s a good buy
Apple MacBook Air M1 open, on a table.

Typically, refurbished MacBook deals, or most refurbished laptop deals for that matter, aren't worth the cost. You can buy a brand-new system for about the same price, especially thanks to the best MacBook deals out there. But that's not the case with a deal Best Buy has available right now. You can get a Geek Squad Certified and refurbished MacBook Air, with an Intel 8th Gen Core i5,  for just $580 -- that saves you $320 off the usual $900 price. A newer model MacBook Air is going to cost you over $900, especially when you factor in taxes and shipping. This is the 2019 model, so while it is a few years old, you're still getting a laptop that can go the distance, as Apple's software updates usually keep older systems performing well.

Why you should buy this refurbished MacBook Air deal at Best Buy
Generally, we only recommend buying refurbished or renewed products straight from the manufacturer, but Best Buy's Geek Squad is the exception to that rule. That's because all refurbished and certified products go through rigorous testing, with detailing, sanitization, and cosmetic grading for the finished product done before they're put up for sale. In other words, they take their time to make sure they certify only good products in reasonable condition. Even if a bad egg slips by, they offer a 90-day warrant with extended warranty protection available -- if you're worried about extended coverage. Although extended warranties are available on an item-by-item basis, some may not qualify.

Read more
Best Apple deals: Save on AirPods, Apple Watch, iPad, MacBook
Apple MacBook Air M1 open, on a table.

Apple makes some of the most popular tech on the planet. Apple devices offer premium hardware and designs, and its software ecosystem makes work and play easier, more convenient, and often more fun. Apple devices regularly earns spots among the best smartwatches, best laptops, best wireless earbuds, and best tablets. All of these devices offer a great opportunity to save right now, as some of the best Apple deals we’ve seen are currently available to shop. We’ve rounded them all up into one place for your convenience, so if you’re in the market for a new MacBook, Apple Watch, iPad, or something else made by Apple, read onward for more information on the best Apple deals taking place right now.
Apple AirTag (4-Pack) -- $83, was $99

Insert the Apple AirTag into your bag, gadget, or any item that you may misplace, so that you can track it if you lose it. The Apple AirTag is one of the best Bluetooth trackers if you're using an iPhone or iPad because not only does it offer a one-tap setup, but it can utilize the millions of devices in Apple's Find My network to help you find your stuff if it goes beyond the Bluetooth range of 30 feet. It's powered by a replaceable battery that can last for more than a year before you need a new one.

Read more