Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Jury awards Oracle $1.3 bln in suit against SAP

Add as a preferred source on Google
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Database giant Oracle has won a major victory in its software theft case against rival SAP: a jury has ordered SAP to pay Oracle $1.3 billion to Oracle for stealing software and customer support materials from a password-protected Oracle Web site. If the finding holds up, the award will be one of the largest ever granted for software piracy, and may send a clear signal to the enterprise and business software communities not only because of the size of the ruling, but because of the damage to the reputation of one of the industry’s major names.

Few industry watchers were surprised that the jury awarded Oracle damages: before the trial got underway, SAP admitted some liability and set aside some $160 million to pay for damages, about $120 of which has already been granted to Oracle. But few expected the jury to award such a large amount to Oracle.

Recommended Videos

“The trial made it clear that SAPs most senior executives were aware of the illegal activity from the very beginning,” said Oracle President Safra Catz, in a statement. “For more than three years, SAP stole thousands of copies of Oracle software and then resold that software and related services to Oracle’s own customers.”

The case surrounded the action of a software support company called TomorrowNow, which SAP acquired in 2005. Oracle uncovered unusual activity on a protected customer support Web site, including a number of registrations with obviously fraudulent information and enormous amount of software and customer support documents being transfered to servers operated by TomorrowNow. SAP admitted that TomorrowNow had been illicitly downloading material from Oracle, but threw itself on the mercy of the court, arguing that Oracles claims of damages were outrageously overblown. Oracle maintained that SAP owed it billions for the stolen software, as well as stolen business: according to Oracle, SAP picked up 358 customer using materials it stole from Oracle.

“We are, of course, disappointed by this verdict and will pursue all available options, including post-trial motions and appeal if necessary,” SAP wrote in its own statement. “This will unfortunately be a prolonged process and we continue to hope that the matter can be resolved appropriately without more years of litigation.”

SAP shut down TomorrowNow some time ago.

Oracle’s ever-outspoken CEO Larry Ellison used the trial as a means to humiliate rival SAP, and wasted no time dragging rival Hewlett-Packard into the trial as well, attempting to subpoena HP’s new CEO, Leo Apotheker, to ask what he was doing while TomorrowNow was busy stealing Oracle software. Before taking over HP’s top spot, Apotheker was a CEO as top sales executive at SAP. Of course, Oracle’s new co-President is former HP CEO Mark Hurd.

SAP’s next move in the case is not clear. The judge in the case theoretically has the power to reduce the jury’s damage award, but it’s rare for a judge to modify a jury verdict in these sorts of cases.

[Photo credit: Oracle Corporate Communications]

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Meta’s detection tool fails to identify photos generated by its own Muse Image AI
Meta has created an invisible watermarking tool called Content Seal that is embedded in all images generated by the Muse Image AI.
Meta AI identification tool.

Earlier this week, Meta announced two new AI products, namely, Muse Image and Muse Video. As the name suggests, these are generative AI tools for making photos and video clips using natural language text prompts. Soon after their rollout commenced, these tools sparked controversy because Meta had automatically opted in Instagram users, allowing others to use their publicly posted media and convert them into remixed AI content. But it appears that Meta courted another loss on its side of the court.

What's the problem?

Read more
Your Google AI Studio apps can finally have polished, presentable web links
AI Studio web apps can now use personalized subdomains
google ai studio logos

Google AI Studio has made building a web app surprisingly easy. You can describe what you want, refine the design through prompts, and publish the result without setting up a traditional development environment. An awkward point of friction comes after deployment, when the finished app still has to live behind a long, forgettable Cloud Run link.

Google is now cleaning up that final step. AI Studio lets you assign a deployed web app a personalized address under the “ai.studio” domain, such as “your-app-name.ai.studio.” A recognizable URL should make the project look more presentable in a portfolio, client demo, social post, or internal project page.

Read more
You can now check if a Google ad was made using AI
Google will auto-label its own AI ads, but third-party AI ads still rely on advertisers to come clean.
google-ads-ai-label

Ever looked at an ad and wondered if a real person made it or if it was AI generated in seconds? Google is now giving you a way to find out.

The company just announced a new AI transparency label that tells you whether an ad was created or edited using generative AI tools. The label lives inside Google's My Ad Center, and it is rolling out across Google Search, YouTube, and Discover globally.

Read more