Skip to main content

Level 3 and Comcast neutrality battle heats up

Image used with permission by copyright holder

Earlier this week, Internet backbone provider Level 3 Communications accused cable operator Comcast of trying to put up “toll booths” on the Internet by demanding Level 3 pay ongoing charges to send data to Comcast’s network. Comcast characterized Level 3’s accusations as “duplicitous,” saying that while it’s happy to provide free peering services to other networks where traffic to and from those networks is roughly balanced, Level 3’s recent distribution deal with Netflix means Level 3 is sending Comcast about five times as much traffic as it is accepting from Comcast—and that puts Level 3 in the same business as “content delivery networks” like Akamai and Amazon’s CloudFront that pay for interconnection services. But where Comcast is saying Level 3 is now a content delivery network rather than a backbone provider, Level 3 says Comcast isn’t a backbone provider either: it’s just a cable company that controls “local access networks.”

Over the last few days, the rhetoric of the situation has continued to escalate, with the Federal Communications Commission speaking with representatives of both companies about the dispute. In the meantime, the companies have continued to trade barbs: Comcast has posted the full text of its letter to the FCC characterizing the affair as a “peering dispute,” while Level 3 is sidestepping matters of Internet traffic volumes and accuses Comcast of discriminating against competitors of Comcast’s Xfinity and cable service by charging a “price” for competitors to reach Comcast’s Internet subscribers. And, as the largest cable company in the United States, Comcast has lots of Internet subscribers, in no small part because cable companies (and phone companies) network build-outs were protected from competition by exclusive government franchises.

Now, Level 3 has issued a 19-point FAQ document seeking to deflate Comcast’s claims that the matter is an “old-fashioned peering dispute.” Level 3 claims that Comcast wants to get paid twice for delivering the same content—one by subscribers requesting data, and again by Level 3 for delivering that data. Level 3 maintains that Comcast’s fees are all about protecting its own Xfinity and cable operations from Internet video competitors, and Comcast’s efforts to label competitors as something other than “network peers” is all about making those competitors become Comcast customers in order to reach Comcast subscribers.

Comcast claims the fees it’s charging Level 3 for access are “no different” than fees charged to other content delivery networks, but Level 3 asserts that no other “broadband access provider”—note Level 3 doesn’t say “backbone provider”—in the United States levies Level 3 the type of fees Comcast is charging.

“If incumbent owners of dominant local access networks are allowed to unilaterally impose additional ‘tolls’ on content or applications requested by their subscribers,” Level 3 wrote, “it is not the current, established companies who are most at risk but rather the next great ideas which lead to the great companies of tomorrow.”

It’s not clear how the dispute between the two companies can be resolved. For now, Level 3 is paying Comcast’s additional fees so that customers don’t see a disruption in service. However, by going public with its position, Level 3 is hoping to influence public opinion and federal policymakers into mandating “forced interconnection on fair terms”—and notes the FCC has intervened in a case where telephone operators blocked broadband subscribers from accessing VoIP phone services.

Editors' Recommendations

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Production of 3nm chips for 2022 Apple devices to ramp up this year
Apple M1 chip on a motherboard.

Faster and more power-efficient chips are on track to launch next year. According to a new report, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, or TSMC, is slated to begin production on a new 3nm process later this year, with volume production to commence in 2022.

The new 3nm chips could arrive in products like the A-series processors on Apple's iPhones and iPads as well as the M series chipsets on new, next-generation Macs, including a MacBook Pro. This information corroborates earlier leaks suggesting that Apple could migrate its products to 3nm chips in 2022.

Read more
Intel heats up graphics battle against Nvidia with ray tracing-capable Xe cards
Intel logo

Intel's forthcoming graphics chips are poised to deliver some serious competition to Nvidia, which embraced real-time ray tracing when the company launched its RTX series graphics cards late last year. Intel also announced that it will back the new feature.

For gamers, ray tracing brings cinematic rendering by rendering how light is absorbed, reflected, or refracted on surfaces in real time. Initially, Intel's support for ray tracing will be for the company's data center graphics cards. Intel's line of discrete graphics cards are scheduled for a 2020 launch.

Read more
House votes to restore net neutrality rules, but effort faces long odds
Save the Internet protest stock photo

A step was taken toward the restoration of net neutrality regulations when the U.S. House of Representatives voted to approve the Save the Internet Act this week.

According to The Verge, the Save the Internet Act was approved on April 10, with 232 votes in favor of the measure and 190 votes against it. Also known as HR 1644, the Save the Internet Act is a bill intended “to restore the open internet order of the Federal Communications Commission [FCC].”

Read more