Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Reviews

Logitech G435 gaming headset review: Too cheap to be good

Add as a preferred source on Google
Logitech's G435 gaming headset on a stand.
Niels Broekhuijsen/Digital Trends
Logitech G435 Gaming Headset
MSRP $80.00
“The Logitech G435 is a wireless gaming headset that sacrifices too much to hit its attractive price.”
Pros
  • Lightspeed wireless connection with Bluetooth support
  • Lightweight
  • Comfortable for long gaming sessions
  • Affordable
Cons
  • Feels cheaply made
  • Disappointing sound quality
  • No boom-mic

“Why you can trust Digital Trends – We have a 20-year history of testing, reviewing, and rating products, services and apps to help you make a sound buying decision. Find out more about how we test and score products.“

When looking for the best gaming headset, it’s easy to fall into the trap of wanting wireless connectivity. Having one less cable really tidies up a workspace, and it’s nice to be able to get up without needing to take the headset off.

Recommended Videos

But the feature tends to add a significant amount to the price tag due to the need for a wireless radio, electronics, and battery. That’s not  the case with the Logitech G435 Lightspeed, however. You won’t find a cheaper wireless gaming headset — at least not one from a well-known brand.

Unfortunately, the G435 cuts too many corners to hit that price point, leaving you with a headset that doesn’t feel like it’s worth $80.

Design

Thin headband on Logitech's G435 gaming headset.
Niels Broekhuijsen/Digital Trends

Starting with the design, the first thing that stands out about the G435 is that it’s extremely light. It weighs just 165 grams, which is absolutely nothing as far as headsets go, especially wireless ones. For comparison, Razer’s Barracuda X weighs in at 250 grams, which is considered light, and something high-end like Corsair’s Virtuoso RGB Wireless XT weighs 382 grams. It’s even lighter than the 240-gram Logitech G335.

So, yes, the G435 is indeed very light. But build quality is a concern with a headset this light. There’s no getting around it: The G435 feels flimsy and cheap. The plastic parts are all thin, there are no nice materials, and the headband, although it looks full, it’s just a plastic frame with a fabric cover.

I feel like if I held the headband in my fist, it would be one strong squeeze away from snapping. That’s not good. Logitech is marketing the light weight purely as a benefit, but it feels like it was a decision made to cut costs, and it shows. The heavier Logitech G533 looks and feels more premium, and can be picked up on a discount for less than the newer G435.

I can’t deny the advantages of an ultralight headset, however. The G435’s light weight and soft cloth earcups make it one of the most comfortable headsets I’ve had the pleasure of wearing. It’s surprisingly pleasant resting on the neck, too.

The earcups don’t swivel to lay flat on your chest, but because there is no protruding microphone, and because it’s surprisingly small, your chin doesn’t collide into it as much while turning your head.

Features

Beam-forming microphone on Logitech's G435 headset.

When it comes to features, it’s no surprise that the G435 isn’t highly kitted out. That doesn’t mean it’s shabby, though. The headset supports various spatial audio codecs including Dolby Atmos, has an optional volume limit of 85 decibels to protect your ears, and the dual beamforming mics work together to reduce background noise.

And yes, that means the G435 doesn’t have a boom mic, a regular feature in gaming headsets. Boom mics provide that tighter, clearer audio quality compared to the smartphone-level quality that beamforming mics provide. It’s a surprise to see Logitech leave it out here, as even the the G335 includes one.

Charging the G435 happens via the USB-C port, and a full battery is rated for 18 hours of life. Controls are equally simple: There is an on/off button, volume controls, and a mic/mute button.

Controls on the G435 gaming headset.
Niels Broekhuijsen/Digital Trends

The primary method of connectivity for the G435 is over the included 2.4GHz Lightspeed dongle, but you can also use it with Bluetooth devices in a low-latency mode – this combo makes it usable with not only PC, but also PlayStation devices and mobile phones.

That’s pretty sweet if you consider that the vast majority of gaming headsets won’t do Bluetooth, and you’ll often have to jump up to something like the SteelSeries Actis 9, which costs a hefty $200.

Sound quality

Ear cushions on the Logitech G435 gaming headset.

Of course, the headset’s real test comes down to sound quality. The G435 still comes packed with 40mm drivers, which sounds promising, but in practice, I wouldn’t expect acoustic miracles from the G435. There is plenty of bass and some detail at the top, but the headset is a bit lacking in the midsection – I would describe the sound profile as hollow.

There’s a lack of “fullness” to the sound that makes you crank the volume up to get the desired satisfaction. In that way, it’s a good thing it comes with a volume limiter.

But then again, this is an $80 wireless headset. Great sound quality was never the primary goal, and the acoustics are good enough for casual play. If you’re a competitive gamer, though, you may want to look for something a bit more revealing in terms of sound so that you don’t miss your opponents’ footsteps when they sneak up to you.

Our take

The Logitech G435 Lightspeed has a few things going for it, such as its light weight, comfort, and Bluetooth support. However, unless you absolutely need a wireless headset for under $80, I would stay away from it and spend the same budget on a wired pair.

Due to the need to squeeze a wireless radio, control module, and battery into the slim budget, Logitech has had to make concessions to the build and sound quality. They take too much away from the overall experience, and even though it’s wireless, the G435 does not feel like a set of $80 headphones.

Are there any alternatives?

The closest alternative is Razer’s recently launched Barracuda X gaming headset, which costs $20 more. Although it doesn’t support Bluetooth, it offers better build and sound quality, as well as a proper microphone, and it looks more appropriate for outside the home. It’s more expensive but well worth the added expense.

The Logitech G533 is also a good choice. Despite having originally sold for $150, you can currently pick it up at retailers for as low as $74.

If shopping wired at the same budget, the entry-level HyperX Cloud II headset offers much better build and sound quality.

How long will it last?

Although with delicate care the G435 should last two to three years, its fragile build is one accident or rage quit away from snapping.

Should I buy it?

If you really need a headset for $80, don’t buy a wireless headset. Too much of the budget is going to the wireless radio, electronics, and battery, and at this budget, you’re better off buying a headset that has a cable.

Niels Broekhuijsen
Having failed to grow up, Niels never quit his gaming hobby and decided to turn it into his work as a freelance technology…
Claude can now build live dashboards and animated explainers from your data
Anthropic just launched two new tools in beta: Claude Dashboards and Claude Motion.
claude-dashboard-motions-feature

Staring at a static slide while your presentation needs something more dynamic is a familiar workplace headache. Anthropic just gave Claude two new tools to fix that. Claude Dashboards and Claude Motion are both launching in beta today, letting you turn raw company data into live visuals and static ideas into short animated explainers.

How does Claude Dashboards work?

Read more
Don’t trust AI chatbots to pick your blood pressure monitor, study warns
Before trusting AI about your blood pressure monitor, check an independent validation registry instead first.
blood-pressure-monitor

Asking an AI chatbot whether your blood pressure monitor is actually trustworthy could leave you with a wrong answer. New research presented at the American Heart Association's Hypertension Scientific Sessions 2026 found that popular AI search tools can correctly identify validated monitors only 63-91% of the time, depending on which AI chatbot you use.

AI can identify validated home BP monitors only 2/3 of time

Read more
ChatGPT can imitate a cartoonist. Now it’s signing their name, too
OpenAI’s image generator has put real New Yorker cartoonists’ signatures on cartoons they didn’t draw, confusing readers about who made them
ChatGPT

Brendan Loper started hearing from people who thought he’d drawn a cartoon circulating online. His pen name was on it, but the image had been generated with ChatGPT.

Nieman Lab documented signatures belonging to more than 15 New Yorker contributors on AI-generated cartoons. Those names can give a reposted image a convincing credit line, even when the artist had no hand in making it.

Read more