Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Macbook Neo stress test shows Apple could’ve made it run cooler with a simple fix

This simple mod makes the MacBook Neo faster.

Add as a preferred source on Google
Apple MacBook Neo with users hands on it
Apple

Apple’s MacBook Neo arrived as a shock to the industry. It is the new cheap MacBook that is designed to be silent, efficient, and affordable. But a new stress test suggests that it could have been noticeably better with a very simple change.

As per a recent test, the addition of a basic copper plate to the cooling setup can improve both thermals and performance by a meaningful margin. And the frustrating part? It isn’t some complex engineering overhaul and is relatively straightforward.

What’s holding back the MacBook Neo?

Just like the MacBook Air, the Neo runs on a completely passive cooling system. So the fanless design, which keeps the A18 Pro chip cool, is part of the problem. There is no active cooling here to help dissipate the heat. While you do get a completely silent device that is thin and lightweight, and even more power-efficient, the trade-off is thermal throttling.

Under sustained workloads, the chip heats up quickly, forcing the system to reduce performance to stay within the optimal temperature limits. And this is completely avoidable, as per an ETA Prime video on YouTube.

How to boost the MacBook Neo’s performance

By adding a copper plate for improved heat transfer, the MacBook Neo was able to spread heat more efficiently across the chassis. The result?

  • Lower operating temperatures
  • Reduced throttling
  • Noticeable performance gains (in double-digit percentages)
Recommended Videos

In real-world use, this is a significant improvement for such a small hardware change.

Apple probably skipped this for various reasons. Adding additional thermal materials, like a copper plate, increases manufacturing costs, affects internal layout, and potentially transfers more heat to other components.

Furthermore, the MacBook Neo is positioned as a $599 entry-level MacBook, so the company is clearly optimizing for cost efficiency, simplicity, battery life, and silent operations. It isn’t meant for hefty workloads, which is what the more expensive MacBook Air and MacBook Pro are for.

Vikhyaat Vivek
Vikhyaat Vivek is a tech journalist and reviewer with seven years of experience covering consumer hardware, with a focus on…
The Mac Pro nearly received an M3 Extreme chip twice as powerful as M3 Ultra
High production costs likely killed Apple’s M3 Extreme plans
Apple's Mac Pro on a table at a press event.

Apple discontinued the Mac Pro earlier this year, ending a 20-year run for a computer that once represented the very best of the company’s desktop lineup. However, Apple reportedly had much bigger plans for the machine before ultimately replacing it with the Mac Studio.

According to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, Apple developed an M3 Extreme chip that could have offered twice as many CPU and GPU cores as the M3 Ultra. The processor was intended to sit above the Ultra tier and could have finally given the Mac Pro the performance advantage it badly needed. Apple eventually abandoned the chip due to concerns over production costs and limited demand for such an expensive machine.

Read more
Hidden prompts can secretly rewrite an AI’s memory, and researchers say that’s a serious problem
Researchers discover AI attack that rewrites an assistant's long-term memory
Chatbot on a smartphone.

Large language models are getting better at remembering us. Whether it's your preferred writing style, recurring tasks, shopping habits or project deadlines, AI assistants are increasingly storing long-term memories to make future conversations feel more personal and useful. But according to new research, that same feature could become one of AI's biggest security vulnerabilities.

Researchers from New Mexico State University have demonstrated a new attack called GhostWriter, capable of secretly planting false memories inside AI agents. Rather than stealing information outright, the attack manipulates what an AI remembers, potentially causing it to make dangerous decisions long after the original attack has taken place.

Read more
This experiment shows how easy it is to poison an open-weight AI model for under $100
This research raises new doubts about trusting open weight AI models.
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

Open-weight AI models have been having a moment lately. Just this month, Moonshot's massive Kimi K3 model landed close behind Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol in several benchmarks, all while remaining fully open-weight and downloadable by anyone.

However, Katie Paxton-Fear, a cybersecurity lecturer at Manchester Metropolitan University and staff security advocate at Semgrep, managed to poison an open-weight model and proved how easily that openness can be turned against you (via The Register).

Read more