Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

New benchmarks show increased MacBook Pro performance using external graphics

Kevin Parrish
By

Now that MacOS 10.13.4 is available supporting external graphics cards on compatible Mac devices, is the additional cost of an enclosure and add-in card worth the investment? That could be a yes for graphics-heavy applications, but there are limitations; the feature only supports AMD’s graphics cards and the Mac device must have an integrated Thunderbolt 3 port. There is also no external GPU support in Boot Camp and currently no “official” external GPU support for the Mac’s built-in screen. 

Recent benchmarks using a 2015 15-inch MacBook Pro with a Core i7-6820HQ processor and a discrete AMD Radeon Pro 460 graphics chip showed a significant performance increase when using the Radeon RX 580 add-in graphics card in an external enclosure. For instance, in the OpenGL test in Cinebench R15, the Pro 460 chip managed 56 frames per second while the external RX 580 clocked in at 86 frames per second. 

Recommended Videos

On the gaming front, World of Warcraft using Apple’s Metal graphics API, a 1080p resolution, and high detail settings saw an average of 71 frames per second on the internal graphics chip, and 141 frames per second on the external graphics chip. Meanwhile, in Civilization VI, the internal GPU scored an average of 66 frames per second while the external GPU hit an average of 73 frames per second using the OpenGL graphics API, a 1080p resolution, and High detail settings. 

Here are a few other benchmarks: 

GFXBench 4 Metal: Offscreen (1080p) 

  • T-Rex: 354 (internal) – 835 (external)
  • Manhattan: 159 (internal) – 425 (external)
  • Manhattan 3.1: 130 (internal) – 349 (external)

GFXBench 4 GL: Offscreen 

  • T-Rex: 249 (internal) – 435 (external)
  • Manhattan: 101 (internal) – 173 (external) 

Other notable mentions about the recent MacBook Pro benchmarking is that Hitman‘s built-in testing tool worked just fine when benchmarking the laptop’s internal graphics chip but caused a hard crash of the system when attempting to test the external GPU. After that, the game wouldn’t load at all, requiring additional troubleshooting. Meanwhile, Final Cut Pro doesn’t support external graphics, an Apple-developed application that could certainly benefit from the higher-powered solution. 

Related

“eGPU support in macOS High Sierra 10.13.4 is designed to accelerate Metal, OpenGL, and OpenCL applications that benefit from a powerful eGPU,” Apple clearly states. “However, not all applications support eGPU acceleration. Check with the application’s developer to learn more.” 

Apple’s external graphics card support includes the following:

Support for external graphics cards stuffed into enclosures is nothing new for Windows 10 gaming laptops from the likes of Asus and Alienware, but the feature is somewhat of a late arrival on MacOS laptops. Right now, Apple’s external GPU support is fresh out of the oven and obviously needs more time to fully cook and become less of the “hit-and-miss” feature now served up in MacOS 10.13.4. 

As previously stated, the external GPU only supports external displays; it won’t power the Mac’s built-in display. This limitation is supposedly software-only that will likely be addressed on an application-by-application basis by third-party developers in the near future. 

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Kevin Parrish
Kevin Parrish
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kevin started taking PCs apart in the 90s when Quake was on the way and his PC lacked the required components. Since then…
The MacBook Air 15 vs. MacBook Pro 14: the easy way to decide
Apple's 15-inch MacBook Air placed on a desk with its lid closed.

Picking out a new MacBook isn't as easy as it used to be.

The hardest choice in the lineup might be between the 15-inch MacBook Air and the 14-inch MacBook Pro. Both are now offered with the same M3 chip, despite there being a $300 difference in the base models. But when similarly configured, there's actually only a $100 difference between these two laptops.

Read more
I needed to buy a new MacBook. Here’s why I bought a power bank instead
Baseus Blade 2 65W power bank for laptops kept on a green couch.

I rely on a 13-inch MacBook Pro from 2020 for most of my work. Despite its age and being a base variant model, it continues to stack up well against my expectations for all these years.

Since MacBooks are known for longevity, the fact that my MacBook Pro still holds up well a few years later shouldn't sound surprising. However, the first signs of aging recently arrived in the form of a warning about the battery's plummeting health. I was already dreading the idea of having to replace what was otherwise a perfectly good laptop.

Read more
Apple quietly backtracks on the MacBook Air’s biggest issue
The MacBook Air on a white table.

The new MacBook Air with M3 chip not only allows you to use it with two external displays, but it has also reportedly addressed a storage problem that plagued the previous M2 model. The laptop now finally has much faster storage performance since Apple has switched back to using two 128GB NAND modules instead of a single 256GB module on the SSD drive.

This was discovered by the YouTuber Max Tech, who tore down the entry-level model of the MacBook Air M3 with 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage. In his tests, thanks to the two NAND modules, the M3 MacBook Air is nearly double faster than the M2 MacBook Air. Blackmagic Disk Speed tests show that the older M2 model with the problematic NAND chip had a 1584.3 Mb/s write speed, and the newer M3 model had 2108.9 Mb/s for the M3 model, for a 33% difference. In read speeds, it was 1576.4 Mb/s on the old model and 2880.2 Mb/s on the newer model.

Read more