Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Features

Many AMD GPUs might get an unexpected performance boost

Add as a preferred source on Google
RX 7900 XTX and RX 7900 XT on a pink background.
Jacob Roach / Digital Trends

Owners of the best graphics cards made by AMD, rejoice — it seems that there could be a big performance boost coming your way. AMD has accidentally leaked the source code for its proprietary upscaling tech, FSR 4. The leak implies that FSR 4 might soon be available on older GPUs, too.

Right now, FSR 4 is only available on the latest RX 9000 series GPUs, so this could be huge. Here’s everything you need to know.

FSR 4 offers a significant performance boost (with some caveats)

Just last week, AMD accidentally published the entirety of the FSR 4 source code on GitHub. We can’t know whether this was intentional or not, but the code has since been taken down — but not before some outlets, such as VideoCardz, managed to take a peek. It appears that AMD was simply trying to publish the new FidelityFX SDK 2.0.

Recommended Videos

Without getting into the super-techy nitty-gritty, the leak revealed INT8 support in addition to FP8. This suggests that AMD might be exploring a version of FSR 4 that works on the RX 7000 series, including outstanding GPUs like the RX 7800 XT. The addition of INT8 would make it possible for FSR 4 to work on these older GPUs. AMD has previously said that it’d like to make FSR 4 more widely available, but it made no promises, so this is still a hopeful sign.

But there’s so many copies of it out there that there’s little point hiding what’s in them, except from maybe the unfinished attempts at an int8 FSR4 model.

Confirmation for sure that AMD was interested in creating a watered down version of the model for less capable hardware.

— uzzi38 (@uzzi38) August 20, 2025

Leakers are aligned: AMD may be trying to make FSR 4 available on “less capable hardware.”

This would be great news for those who are using some of AMD’s older GPUs, of which there are many. The existing RDNA 4 lineup isn’t massive right now, and with the cards being sold above MSRP, many AMD enthusiasts are sticking to older GPUs for the time being. Meanwhile, FSR 4 has a lot to offer.

Outside of higher frame rates, FSR 4 has been found to reduce ghosting and improve image quality. It’s hard to compare it to Nvidia’s DLSS 4, as that frame generation tech is still more mature and functions differently, but FSR 4 is a huge leap in the right direction. Unfortunately, many gamers haven’t had the chance to try it, because AMD made an unprecedented move and chose to restrict it to RDNA 4.

AMD took a page out of Nvidia’s playbook

AMD FSR and Nvidia DLSS have been competing against each other for years now, but Nvidia has always had the upper hand. Of course, it’s all in the eye of the beholder — or in this case, the reviewer — but DLSS 3 and 4 have consistently produced a massive increase in frame rates. Artifacts and latency certainly happened (and still do happen), but in general, the tech was considered to be ahead of AMD.

DLSS also has the benefit of being widely available. Although AMD has several versions of FSR out all at once, the latest generations have suffered from slower adoption.

Despite these issues, AMD always had one big advantage — availability. FSR 1 through FSR 3 were available on all kinds of GPUs; they were completely platform-agnostic. You could use them on Nvidia, AMD, or Intel graphics cards, making them much more accessible to gamers. Even as an Nvidia user, I still used FSR 3 sometimes when it was available.

FSR 4 breaks the mold. It’s the most powerful iteration of this technology, but it’s also the first one to be locked to a single generation of graphics cards — RDNA 4. This move, while unprecedented for AMD, is nothing new to Nvidia. DLSS has always been unavailable outside of Nvidia’s RTX graphics cards, and both DLSS 3 and DLSS 4 are locked to a single generation, namely the RTX 40-series and the RTX 50-series.

If this new leak turns out to be reality, many gamers might suddenly gain access to AMD’s outstanding FSR 4 tech, once again giving AMD an upper hand over Nvidia when it comes to availability.

This could be massive, but there’s still another problem

If FSR 4 could suddenly become available to more AMD GPUs, everyone would win. However, there are still a few caveats to consider before we get too excited here.

First of all, we don’t know how much we can read into this leak. It does seem to be legitimate, but it’s hard to tell just how soon AMD might be planning to add that FSR 4 support to older GPUs. It could happen in a month, or it could happen in a year, or perhaps it’ll never happen — there’s no telling until AMD makes an official statement.

Second, even if FSR 4 becomes available, game-level adoption has been slow. Only around 65 titles currently support it. Compatibility is expanding, but rather slowly, so just having access to FSR 4 doesn’t guarantee that it’ll run in your favorite games. With that said, many AAA titles do support it now, including (as of very recently) Cyberpunk 2077. It’s still sad to see AMD having to play catch-up with Nvidia here, which offers broader adoption for DLSS 3 and 4 across many more games.

Despite the caveats, I certainly hope that FSR 4 makes its way to the RX 7000 lineup. Whether it’d also become available on older GPUs is doubtful, but the RX 7000 series is broad and was largely successful, so many gamers could benefit. Stay tuned — we’ll let you know if AMD makes FSR 4 officially available on older graphics cards.

Monica J. White
Monica is a computing writer at Digital Trends, focusing on PC hardware. Since joining the team in 2021, Monica has written…
I upgraded from the M1 MacBook Air to the M5, and here’s what changed for me
The M5 changed more about my workflow than I expected.
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

After about four years with the M1 MacBook Air, I finally pulled the trigger on the M5, and I got there just in time to dodge Apple's recent price hike by eleven days, a story I already told elsewhere, and one that still makes me feel unreasonably smug. Upgrading from the M1 was a multi-generational leap for me, not in the ways mentioned on the spec sheet, but in ways that actually changed how I work every day.

Here’s why that matters in 2026, when the memory crisis has hit the consumer electronics market so badly that even giants like Apple had to cave. MacBook Air M5 launched at $1,099, then climbed to $1,299. 

Read more
Another Googlebook just surfaced online, and this one is from Asus
Asus Googlebook renders reveal a Glow Bar, plenty of ports, and a lightweight chassis
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

Google’s upcoming Googlebook lineup is starting to take shape through leaks. Lenovo has already appeared in several renders, while a recent benchmark leak suggests Dell may bring the XPS name to Google’s new laptop platform. Asus is now the latest manufacturer to surface ahead of launch.

Digital Citizen has published multiple renders of an unannounced Asus Googlebook, showing its lid, keyboard, chassis, and port selection. The laptop could make its official debut at IFA next month. Googlebooks are expected to bring Android apps, ChromeOS technology, deeper phone integration, and Gemini features to a new generation of laptops. Acer, Asus, Dell, HP, and Lenovo are all expected to be part of the first wave.

Read more
I’m done charging things that never leave my desk
Wireless peripherals are better than ever, but I’m starting to value the devices that ask absolutely nothing of me
Computer, Computer Hardware, Computer Keyboard

I have two pairs of wireless earbuds that I rotate during long gaming sessions. When one starts complaining about its battery, I swap in the other pair and put the first one on charge. It’s a mildly ridiculous system, but it works. Apparently, my gaming setup now requires something resembling shift work.

Then my mouse died in the middle of a game.

Read more