Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Meta’s detection tool fails to identify photos generated by its own Muse Image AI

Meta has created an invisible watermarking tool called Content Seal that is embedded in all images generated by the Muse Image AI.

Add as a preferred source on Google
Meta AI identification tool.
Nadeem Sarwar / Digital Trends

Earlier this week, Meta announced two new AI products, namely, Muse Image and Muse Video. As the name suggests, these are generative AI tools for making photos and video clips using natural language text prompts. Soon after their rollout commenced, these tools sparked controversy because Meta had automatically opted in Instagram users, allowing others to use their publicly posted media and convert them into remixed AI content. But it appears that Meta courted another loss on its side of the court.

What’s the problem?

Alongside its new AI tools, Meta introduced something called Content Seal, which serves as an invisible watermarking system. Technically, all the images created by the Muse Image AI carry a hidden signal that can be used to identify whether they were made using AI or not. To go with it, the company also launched its own AI identification tool that can read this invisible Content Seal watermark. But it appears that Meta’s AI sniffing tool is not as accurate as the company claims.

According to an analysis by Reuters, images made using the company’s Muse Image AI cannot be reliably detected as AI-generated by Meta’s AI identification software. The outlet analyzed 40 images that were created by Muse Image, but in only 45% of the cases was it able to identify that they were created using AI. In the remaining 55% of the cases, when the images were cropped to one-third or one-fourth of their original size, the AI detection tool developed by Meta simply failed.

Oh, yikes. That’s embarrassing!

That’s a notable flub. On its website, Meta claims that the Content Seal system carries a “hidden provenance signal that stays intact — even when cropped, compressed, resized, or screenshotted.” Following Reuters’ analysis, Meta told the outlet that its AI detection tool is still in preview and that it can’t work reliably when a photo is “heavily cropped.” On an FAQ page available on its AI detector site, Meta also makes it clear that if an image has been generated using a third-party AI product instead of Muse Image, the detection tool will not work.

Meta won’t be the only AI giant that has created a system like Content Seal. Google already has an AI image detection and watermarking system called SynthID in place. It has been adopted by the likes of OpenAI as well. That means if an image is generated using ChatGPT or Gemini, it carries the invisible SynthID watermark and can be detected using Google’s own AI identification tool, which is now available on Google Search, as well. However, Google also makes it clear that SynthID is not 100% foolproof.

Nadeem Sarwar
Nadeem is the Managing Editor at Digital Trends.
AI companies may be gobbling up old books, and I really hope they aren’t destroying them
Booksellers are seeing mysterious bulk orders for old books, and some suspect AI companies
Book, Publication, Text

Secondhand booksellers have noticed a curious pattern over the past few months. Large orders are coming in for old books that often share no obvious subject, author, or genre, leaving sellers wondering who wants them and why.

According to The Guardian, booksellers in the U.K. and Ireland have received bulk orders covering everything from agricultural texts to racing biographies. Some buyers reportedly use opaque aliases, send orders to the same freight warehouses, and pay full price without negotiating bulk discounts. Similar activity has also surfaced in the U.S., Australia, and Europe.

Read more
Claude is getting ambitious with watermarking, and I can smell the problems from a mile away
Claude’s text watermark could flag AI involvement even when it only helped with translation or editing
Claude website open on laptop

Anthropic wants to make AI-generated text easier to identify, and on paper, I have very little reason to complain. The company is experimenting with an invisible watermark that can be baked directly into text generated by Claude.

It sounds like a sensible idea. AI-generated text is everywhere, and knowing where something came from could certainly help. Moreover, Anthropic isn't simply hiding a marker somewhere inside a document. Its approach changes how Claude selects words to create a statistical pattern that can later be detected.

Read more
I switched from Windows to Mac after 25 years, and it’s the trackpad that converted me.
Well, that rhymes.
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

I’ve been using Windows laptops for almost 25 years. In that time, I never once seriously thought of buying a MacBook. In fact, I can honestly say I had never used one at all until I bought my MacBook Air M5 six months ago. Never borrowed one for a weekend, spent an afternoon at an Apple Store, or even played with one at a friend's house. Macs, to me, were just expensive computers for those who edited videos, made logos, or liked drinking expensive coffee.

My change came completely by accident.

Read more