Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Microsoft Research Shares Weird Mouse Concepts

Add as a preferred source on Google

Source: Arstechnica
Source: Arstechnica Image used with permission by copyright holder

Microsoft Research has been spewing out high profile prototypes — either in leaks or via official releases – in what’s likely in part an effort to grow the already substantial excitement surrounding Microsoft’s energized fall lineup which includes Windows 7. Last week details of a potential dual-screen tablet mini-PC emerged.

Recommended Videos

Now Microsoft has given the public a peak at its visions of the future of the computer mouse. Microsoft, as one of the leading makers of computer mice, both in optical and corded flavors, is one of the most influential players in the industry. Its rolled out some relatively exotic designs over the years, but those fall short of the new ones its cooking up.

One mouse of the five featured prototypes does have anything for your hand to hold onto at all. Dubbed the “Side Mouse”, the mouse consists of an arm rest which detects you moving your hand or tapping on the table. Another intriguing design is “Arty”, which has thumb and index finger button articulated arms. These arms serve both as buttons and as means of doing gesture-driven commands, such as pinching.

The other three mice — the FTIR, Orb, and CAP — each demonstrate different multitouch buttonless click-detection schemes. The FTIR uses frustrated total internal reflection and a camera to spot a user’s presses on a piece of acrylic. The approach features high accuracy of click events. The Orb mouse provides a design friendly to all fingers and employs an infrared multitouch detection scheme. Finally, the CAP mouse uses capacitance to detect click events, saving power and eliminating ambient light errors.

Each of the mice shows off some interesting technology, which could hold promise under certain scenarios. While Microsoft has made no claims to be trying to commercialize any of these designs, some of this technology could eventually see its way into commercial products.

The Microsoft engineers contributing to the project were Nicolas Villar, Shahram Izadi, John Helmes, Steve Hodges, Alex Butler, and Xiang Cao of Microsoft Research; Hrvoje Benko of Microsoft Research; Dan Rosenfeld, Jonathan Westhues, Eyal Ofek, and Billy Chen of Microsoft. They presented a video of their research at the User Interface Software and Technology conference in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada this week.

Ian Bell
I'm the co-founder and CEO of Digital Trends Media Group, which I launched in 2006 out of my home office to share my passion…
Gemini Notebook’s latest update makes it a better study companion
Google is adding voice conversations, lecture recording, interactive quizzes, and short video overviews to its AI-powered notebook.
Gemini Notebook update for students

Google is giving Gemini Notebook, formerly NotebookLM, a major upgrade for students, adding new features designed to help them understand difficult concepts, capture lectures, and turn study materials into interactive learning tools. The update lands alongside a free year of Google's paid AI plan for eligible college students.

Gemini Notebook can now talk you through your notes

Read more
LG 39GX950B review: An ultrawide OLED that gets remarkably close to having it all
LG’s 39-inch 5K2K OLED combines high-end picture quality with seriously fast gaming
Electronics, Screen, Computer Hardware

see at bestbuy

Quick Verdict

Read more
Should we feel bad about deleting an AI? One expert says it’s time to find out
If AI can learn, remember, and make increasingly complex decisions, one expert thinks we should be more careful about how we say goodbye.
an on off toggle

Turning off an AI might sound as simple as hitting a switch, but according to futurist and University of Technology Sydney professor Rocky Scopelliti, that mindset needs to change fast. As first reported by TechXplore, Scopelliti's new book, The Conscious Code, Scopelliti argues that as AI systems get better at reflecting on their own choices, deleting them without a second thought could actually cause harm.

He's not asking us to hand robots legal rights. Instead, he wants us to accept what he calls a duty of good stewardship, basically treating AI responsibly because we're the ones holding the power, not because the AI is demanding it. As he puts it, our design choices can quietly cause damage by wiping out an AI's "learned moral dispositions" without warning.

Read more