Skip to main content

A new Mac Pro with monitor costs $11,000, and it isn’t built for you

mac pro
Julian Chokkattu / Digital Trends
Promotional logo for WWDC 2023.
This story is part of our complete Apple WWDC coverage

The word “affordable” is rarely associated with Apple products. The company’s high prices have caused hecklers to bemoan the “Apple Tax” for decades. More recently, it’s even provided ammo for competitors looking to distract from their own PR disasters.

None of that, however, adequately prepared Mac fans for the past three years. The pricing of all things Mac has gone up with each new hardware iteration, and often by hundreds or even thousands of dollars. Is it justified? And why has Apple launched Mac pricing into the stratosphere?

Recommended Videos

Yes, the Mac Pro is becoming more expensive

The new Mac Pro starts at $6,000. That’s a lot of money, but high-end Macs have always been expensive. Is the new model’s price really that high once you adjust for inflation?

Yes, it is. 1985’s Macintosh XL was a cool $10,000. The Apple Macintosh Plus, released in 1988 for $2,599, adjusts to just a hair above $6,000 in today’s dollars. As the Mac gained steam in the late 1980s, however, prices dropped significantly. The original Mac Pro, released in 2006, had a $2,500 list price. That translates to about $3,150 in today’s dollars. 2013’s “trashcan” Mac Pro started at $3,000, which is just $3,300 once adjusted for inflation.

Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends

The display is even more egregious. Starting at $5,000, the Pro Display XDR is more expensive than most modern televisions, including 65-inch OLEDs. You can find even more expensive Apple displays if you take a time machine back to 1991, when an Apple Macintosh 21-inch Display would set you back $4,599 – an incredible $8,600 today. But nothing in the past decade compares. The old Thunderbolt Display was a relative bargain at $999. Hell, you can buy a 5K Retina iMac, computer and all, for $1,800.

“Pro” means “not for people”

This trend doesn’t include all Mac devices – the iMac is not a bad deal, and the MacBook Air starts at $1,200 — but it does include every Mac with Pro branding attached to it.

Apple’s least expensive Pro is the MacBook Pro 13, which starts at $1,300, but that buys you a hilariously stripped-down machine with only a dual core processor. Yes, a dual-core processor, at $1,300, sold in 2019. Like I said. Hilarious.

A prosumer likes the serious, professional, put-together device because it reflects on them.

What you really want is the $1,800 model with the Touch Bar. Not because the Touch Bar is any good, but because it’s the least expensive Pro with anything resembling competitive hardware. Yet even that only buys 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage.

This drives home an important, subtle shift, one that wasn’t obvious as it occurred but now seems plain. The Mac Pro brand, including the MacBook Pro, has abandoned prosumers.

Prosumers was always an awkward term, but it usually referred to enthusiasts who don’t need cutting edge hardware but want it anyway.  A prosumer likes the serious, professional, put-together device because it reflects on them.

Julian Chokkattu/Digital Trends

I’m not personally a Mac fan, but I’m guilty of this same urge with other brands. For example, I love ThinkPad. I like the rough, tough, do-anything nature of that brand — even though I carefully protect my laptops, which are never exposed to anything more destructive than being tossed on the conveyor belt at airport security.

A prosumer device is expensive. No one has ever called a Mac Pro affordable. ThinkPads are expensive for what you get. The same is true of Dell’s XPS and HP’s Envy (or whatever brand HP considers premium this year). But they’re not too expensive. They’re a luxury, but one many people can afford.

They’re priced so high that even enthusiasts won’t be able to justify buying them.

Apple’s new Mac Pro and Pro Display XDR aren’t luxuries. They’re priced so high that even enthusiasts won’t be able to justify buying them. The $11,000 bill for a new Mac Pro with display is enough to buy a very nice used car.

It seems crazy. But remember, the Mac Pro isn’t meant for people. It’s meant for companies, governments, organizations. It might still look like a prosumer device but, through pricing, the Mac Pro has narrowed its focus and cast off the concerns of even the most fanatical amateurs.

But hey. There’s hope. If you get hired at Pixar, or Adobe, or Industrial Light and Magic, you might, if you’re lucky, have the rare chance to touch one.

Matthew S. Smith
Matthew S. Smith is the former Lead Editor, Reviews at Digital Trends. He previously guided the Products Team, which dives…
A new report slams MacBooks’ repairability. Here’s what you can do if you need to fix yours
A person repairing a MacBook on a blue table.

Apple’s best MacBooks have earned a reputation for generous software support and top-tier build quality, two factors that mean they often last far longer than their rivals. But the flipside of the coin is the fact that MacBooks are incredibly difficult to repair, requiring specialized tools, complex disassembly and the enduring patience of a saint.

That idea has been reinforced by a recent report (PDF download) from the US Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) Education Fund, which found that Apple’s MacBooks are the second-worst laptops in terms of repairability, with only Lenovo scoring lower. Worst of all, most of Apple’s poor score came from an extremely low disassembly rating, which will be ominous reading for anyone about to undertake the challenge of tearing down their pricey laptop.

Read more
Apple is working on a mini-LED Studio Display, but the iMac Pro is nowhere to be found
A person using a Mac Studio with an Apple Studio Display.

If you’ve been craving a souped-up Studio Display that improves on the original model released in 2022, there’s been some good news: it looks like a new model with a mini-LED panel and a ProMotion 120Hz refresh rate is on the way. Yet it’s left me with more questions than answers about Apple’s long-lost iMac Pro.

In the world of Apple leaks, you quickly learn that there are two sources whose reliability stands above the rest: Bloomberg reporter Mark Gurman and display industry expert Ross Young. When these two agree on something, it’s pretty much nailed on, and that’s exactly what just happened regarding Apple’s Studio Display.

Read more
I can’t wait for the OLED MacBook Pro — but there’s bad news for MacBook Air fans
The MacBook Pro 16-inch on a table.

It’s no secret that Apple sometimes waits a little longer than its competitors when it comes to releasing new tech in its products, but that approach often makes the delay worthwhile. Just look at the M4 iPad Pro: rival tablets have had OLED displays for years, but when Apple entered the fray in 2024, its tandem OLED panel blew everyone else out of the water.

I’ve been hoping for a long time that the company will pull a similar move with its best MacBooks, bringing OLED screens to its popular laptops that are far above what anyone else can offer. And now, it looks like there’s some good news and some bad news on that front, and it all depends on whether you’re a fan of the MacBook Pro or the MacBook Air.

Read more