Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

NPR seeks to boot trolls, spammers from website

Add as a preferred source on Google

NPR, formally known as National Public Radio, has had it with trolling trolls and spamming spammers plying their trade in the comments the sections of npr.org Web pages. The public radio service has decided to take a rather unique approach to prevent the ad hominem, shamelessly vile and abusive comments that are the trademark of the 21st century Internet troll.

Last week, NPR announced that it had instituted a vetting process for new commenters on its website. Under the new policy, comments from new users will be reviewed by a team of community managers. Only if a comment is deemed appropriate will it then appear on the site.

Recommended Videos

“Once a user has established a reputation for following the commenting guidelines all of his comments will appear immediately after posting,” NPR explains in a blog post. “Community managers will only review comments in response to a specific report from other community members.” NPR says the reviews will be conducted in about 15 minutes.

For users with exiting accounts, those who’ve had a history of having their comments flagged will undergo an evaluation period. Once their comments are deemed devoid of any trolling or spamming behavior, then those users in question will be permitted to post comments without any prior review.

Comments liable to get flagged for review include those that are impolite, obscene, off topic, over 400 words, in violation of copyright, promotional or proselytizing, and anything else that might “feed the trolls” if it’s not already the work of a troll itself.

NPR has close to half a million subscribers on its website. On Friday, NPR’s ombudsman Alicia Shepherd said that the new policy was “not in reaction to the vitriol that erupted over the attack in Cairo on CBS Correspondent Lara Logan.”

Aemon Malone
Former Digital Trends Contributor
The Adobe clones are real, but so is the work left to finish them
Seven free alternatives are out now, but their own documentation shows how much work remains
Nature, Outdoors, Sea

Free versions of Photoshop, Premiere Pro, and Lightroom are an easy sell to anyone tired of paying Adobe. Add a developer who says he vibe-coded replacements for seven of the company’s apps, and the triumphant headline practically writes itself. Adobe can presumably start clearing its desk.

Brandon Thomas’s Crafting Apps give that excitement something to work with. People can download the tools, inspect the source code, and find their way around familiar interfaces.

Read more
Getting health advice from AI chatbots comes with a problem doctors may never see
Researchers say AI companies should face the same liability as doctors for bad health advice
ChatGPT and pills on the same canvas.

AI chatbots have quietly become a go-to source for medical advice the extent that some are dangerously skipping real doctors. But when AI's health advice goes wrong, doctors may never see the exchange behind it.

Researchers from Binghamton University, Stanford, Texas A&M, and Indiana University published a paper in Nature Health examining what happens after a chatbot gives you bad health information. Their biggest concern is not just that chatbots can be wrong. It is that those mistakes often leave no trace for doctors, researchers, or regulators to catch.

Read more
AI companies expect a catastrophic AI incident and are reportedly preparing for the aftermath
A major AI cyberattack could disrupt essential services, damage public trust, and spark a political fight over regulations.
openai-anthropic-logo-on-screen

Leaders at OpenAI, Anthropic, and other AI companies are reportedly preparing for a potential AI disaster that could turn the public against artificial intelligence. According to an Axios report, industry leaders are privately running through possible scenarios for what happens after a catastrophic AI incident.

What kind of AI disaster are companies preparing for?

Read more