Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Nvidia says it’s better than AMD for low-lag gaming, and has the data to prove it

Add as a preferred source on Google
Nvidia RTX 2080 Super impressions
Riley Young/Digital Trends

Nvidia has been showing off some new technological innovations at this year’s Gamescom show, most of which require one of its RTX graphics cards to experience at their full potential. One that doesn’t is the new, ultra-low latency option that’s now included with its latest Game Ready Driver (436.02), which debuted during the show. It, like AMD’s anti-lag, helps reduce latency between user inputs and their action in games. According to Nvidia’s own benchmarks, its solution is better.

After two graphics card generations from both Nvidia and AMD that haven’t pushed the performance envelope significantly, features are a greater selling point than they’ve been in the past. For Nvidia, the two biggest benefits of its RTX generation have been RT and Tensor core-powered ray tracing and deep learning super sampling. For AMD, it’s been image sharpening and input lag reduction. While Nvidia previously claimed it had its own anti-lag system for years, it’s now released a new, improved version that’s more in line with what AMD offers. Only better, according to its own benchmarks.

Recommended Videos

Although the time saved is in terms of milliseconds, high-speed gamers should notice a slight improvement from when no anti-lag features enabled. Nvidia claims, via TechRadar, that it can reduce input lag in Apex Legends from 30ms down to just 19ms. The Division 2’s input lag could be reduced from 49ms down to just 22ms with ultra-low-latency enabled.

AMD has made similarly impressive claims about its anti-lag feature’s capabilities, suggesting that input lag could be cut in half. While that would likely compete favorably with Nvidia’s low-latency, according to Nvidia’s testing and results, Nvidia is the clear winner. First-party benchmarks need to always be taken with a healthy dose of skepticism, but this is still good news for consumers. AMD’s anti-lag feature was enough of a concern for Nvidia that it aped it and created a feature for Nvidia gamers that is as good, if not better in some cases, which just means more gamers end up with lower input lag in their games. That’s a good thing.

AMD introduced image sharpening in a recent release and now Nvidia has done so as well. Also introduced with the new driver release, is its new Freestyle Sharpening feature that will purportedly work better than its previous “detail” filter, providing better-quality images while not exacting as much of a performance hit.

Elsewhere in this driver release, Nvidia also introduced a more expansive list of G-Sync-compatible monitors and beta support for its GPU integer scaling, which should make older games and those with a pixel art style look far better on higher-resolution monitors where they can otherwise look a little blurry.

You can download Nvidia’s latest drivers from the official website.

Interested in reducing your input lag even further? A high refresh rate monitor can help.

Jon Martindale
Jon Martindale covers how to guides, best-of lists, and explainers to help everyone understand the hottest new hardware and…
ASUS Zenbook Duo UX8407AA review: Two screens finally earned their place in my bag
Two machines are definitely better than one, but on the same laptop? Asus nailed it, but you must be willing to pay for the convenience.
ASUS Zenbook Duo has two displays

See at Amazon

Two displays on a laptop once sounded like an elaborate solution waiting for the right problem. ASUS has spent the past few generations steadily proving otherwise. After using the latest Zenbook Duo (2026) UX8407AA for over two weeks, I started arranging my daily routine around that second display. 

Read more
How Claude helped my 65-year-old dad finally ditch his handwritten ledgers
AI has a lot to answer for, but this one small win is hard to argue with, at least for me.
Claude app on iPhone

My dad has owned a small business for as long as I can remember, and for just as long, he's kept his books the old-fashioned way. Every sale gets written down by hand so he can file his taxes later. The problem is that his accountant needs this data in Excel, and my dad, who didn’t grow up around computers, has never learned how to use it.

For years, his workaround was paying someone to manually type his handwritten entries into a spreadsheet. It worked, but it was adding additional cost to his business, which he wanted to avoid, but couldn't.

Read more
AI’s energy tax was already concerning. Research says AI agents are over hundred times worse
AI agents could consume 136 times more energy than today's AI, study finds
AI agents

The AI industry's soaring electricity demand has already become a growing concern for governments, utilities, and technology companies. But a new study suggests the next generation of artificial intelligence could make that problem significantly worse.

Researchers from the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) have published what they describe as the first comprehensive analysis of the energy cost of AI agents - AI systems capable of reasoning, planning, and completing tasks autonomously. Their findings show that these systems can consume up to 136.5 times as much energy per query as conventional generative AI models, raising fresh questions about whether the infrastructure supporting tomorrow's AI is ready for what's coming.

Read more