Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Digital Trends may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. Why trust us?

OneDrive is getting an AI feature that names your files so you don’t have to

Microsoft's Copilot Suggested Rename reads what's inside your OneDrive files and suggests better names for them automatically.

Add as a preferred source on Google
Microslop Microsoft AI Copilot logo
Digital Trends

Renaming files is one of those tasks that sounds trivial until you are staring at a folder full of documents or files called Document1, Scan_04182026, and FinalFINALv3. Microsoft is doing something about it.

A new feature, called Copilot Suggested Rename, is on the Microsoft 365 roadmap. It is scheduled to roll out starting June 2026. The AI-powered OneDrive feature reads the content of your file and automatically recommends clear, descriptive file names, saving you time. 

How does Copilot Suggested Rename actually work?

The feature is built directly into the rename dialog inside OneDrive (on web). 

Recommended Videos

When you go to rename a file, Copilot goes through its content and offers three context-aware name suggestions within the rename dialog. You can pick one with a single click. 

The feature also shows up in the post-upload toast notification, the pop-up that appears when you upload a single supported file, so you could rename it immediately after it lands in OneDrive.

Which file types does it support?

Copilot Suggested Rename works across a wide range of formats. Microsoft Office documents, including Word (DOCX), PowerPoint (PPTX), and Excel (XLSX), are all supported, along with PDFs, Markdown files, and images. 

That, I’d say, covers the overwhelming majority of files most people actually store online. The feature is currently in development. And yes, It is a web-only feature for now, meaning it will be available for personal and business OneDrive users on the web, while the desktop or mobile rollout might follow. 

In my opinion, file naming has been a low-priority problem ignored by desktop and computer, widely ignored, and genuinely annoying at scale. Microsoft building AI-powered rename suggestions directly into the OneDrive rename dialog is the right place to begin. 

Shikhar Mehrotra
For more than five years, Shikhar has consistently simplified developments in the field of consumer tech and presented them…
Google’s new Magic Pointer Play Store listing reveals a Gemini shortcut built for Googlebooks
The unannounced app turns the cursor into a contextual AI tool for search, image creation, and shopping
Plant, Text, Business Card

Google has quietly published a new Play Store listing for Magic Pointer, an unannounced app built for Googlebooks. Updated on July 10, the app turns the cursor into a Gemini shortcut that can act on whatever a user selects on screen.

Magic Pointer can send an image to Lens, generate a related image, or surface a shopping action without forcing users to open a separate chatbot. Regular Android devices currently show as incompatible, so the listing offers an early preview rather than a broad release.

Read more
You can stop using AI, but this new report says you probably can’t escape it
A UK survey found that most people feel AI exposure is unavoidable, raising harder questions about consent, privacy, and whether opting out is still realistic
AI Chatbots

More people are trying to use less AI, but avoiding it altogether may already be impossible.

A survey of 2,055 UK adults found that 42% deliberately limit how much AI they use. Another 70% said avoiding AI exposure would be difficult or impossible, even when they actively wanted less of it.

Read more
The face on an AI interviewer may matter as much as the decision it makes
Researchers found that race and gender matching changed how fairly rejected applicants viewed an automated interview, even though everyone received the same outcome
File, Computer Hardware, Electronics

An AI hiring system can treat every applicant the same and still leave some people feeling targeted. Researchers found that rejected candidates judged an automated interview differently depending on the race and gender of the avatar delivering the result.

Around 220 participants completed a simulated interview for a fictional customer support role with one of four photorealistic AI avatars. Everyone was rejected, yet perceptions of fairness shifted with the interviewer’s appearance. An algorithm audit could miss that reaction because candidates don’t experience the system as raw code. They experience a face asking questions and judging their answers.

Read more