Skip to main content

PCI Express: The next frontier for hard drives

pci express hard drives what are they how fast will be intelp3700
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Hard drives have seen their performance improve more than any other component over the last half-decade, all thanks to the popularization of solid state tech. Now, there’s a big leap forward that looks like it’s ready to become more widespread for consumers; SSDs that connect via PCI Express. Already used in some high-end systems, like the Mac Pro and a handful of Ultrabooks, these super-quick drives could soon be super-obtainable.

PCI what?

PCI Express (PCIe) stands for Peripheral Component Interconnect Express, a standard that was defined in 2004 by a collaboration which included Intel, IBM, HP and others. The connection, which is long and skinny (like a RAM slot), was developed to handle every type of internal card imaginable, from sound cards to video cards, and beyond. That meant the standard’s bandwidth had to be extremely high, and it also meant that each of the standard’s data channels had to handle data flowing in two directions at once.

 PCIExpress-1

A single PCIe 3.0 lane can handle almost a gigabyte of data per second, which means that a 4x slot can transfer about four gigabytes per second. PCI Express can handle up to sixteen lanes in a single slot, which equals nearly sixteen gigabytes of bandwidth. As if that wasn’t enough, the next version of the standard plans to double the per-lane bandwidth, raising the ceiling to 31.5 gigabytes per second across a 16-lane slot.

SATA6, by comparison, can only handle up to six gigabytes per second, which puts it at a huge disadvantage. Even Thunderbolt, which combines PCIe with DisplayPort into a single standard, can only manage about 1.25 gigabytes per second, per channel (the standard has two channels). 

Why now?

All this talk of gigabytes and bandwidth makes PCI Express seem like a natural fit for hard drives. So natural, in fact, that you may be wondering why it was never used before.

This is partially due to the sudden rise in hard drive speeds. Prior to 2008, the year Intel released its first consumer SSD and kicked off the competition in that market, hard drives simply couldn’t saturate a single SATA connection. Even early solid state drives couldn’t thoroughly use a single SATA3 port.

The internal layout of desktops and laptops was different in 2004, as well. Expansion cards were far more common. Many systems had a sound card, a video card and a networking card, all of which took up space, and left little for other components. Today, however, these features are already integrated into the motherboard, or even (in some cases) the processor.

Finally, there’s an inertia to every standard that can be difficult to overcome. SATA and PCIe drives require different drivers to optimize their efficiency, and while hard drive companies know a lot about developing for SATA, they don’t have much experience developing for PCIe. Drive makers saw no need to spend money researching and developing new drivers for PCIe when SATA got the job done.

Now there is a need, however, because there’s no other obvious path forward. SATA can’t keep up with the advances of solid state performance, and is restricting the potential that drive makers can extract from their hardware. An alternative is needed, and choosing PCIe makes more sense than developing a brand new standard from scratch. 

Intel, a leader again

As mentioned, Intel’s entry into the consumer solid state market with its original offering, the X25-M, is what kicked off the competition. The company proved that a reasonably affordable and extremely quick SSD appealed to PC enthusiasts, setting a precedent for others.

intelpseries
Image used with permission by copyright holder

History seems to be repeating itself. Intel announced a family of new PCI Express SSDs at Computex, which includes the P3700, P3600 and P3500 series. The most affordable of the set, the P3500, offers 400GB of storage, and transfer speeds exceeding two gigabytes, for just $599.

“Just $599” may still sound like a lot, but the current crop of PCI Express drives is thin indeed. Asus, Plextor, and VisionTek are the only companies with PCIe options in-stock at Newegg as of this writing. What’s available is very expensive; the Asus Raider, for example, retails at $349 for 240GB of storage, and quotes transfer speeds that are half as quick as Intel’s P3500. Intel’s new offerings are a solid value compared to what’s already around.

A kick in the butt 

Clearly, Intel’s lineup of PCI Express drives, which should arrive in the coming months, stomps on everything else that is available. Once launched, these devices will essentially become the solid state drives to buy – provided you have at least $600 to spend, of course.

The Intel X25-M launched in essentially the same position back in 2008, but it didn’t remain on the throne for long. Competitors quickly entered the market, some small (like Corsair), and some large (like Samsung). We’ll no doubt see a repeat of that over the next year or so.

 intelp3700

Don’t expect the revolution to stick to desktops, either. PCI Express drives are already found in some laptops, most notably those built by Apple. Increased proliferation of the technology will lower prices, and spur innovation that spans both desktops and notebooks. In fact, PCI Express hard drives are often prefect for laptops, because they’re very thin, and can be packaged in creative ways. 

Chances are you won’t be purchasing one of Intel’s first P-series drives.  The push for 4K will increase file sizes, however, and quick storage solutions will be needed to make the transfer of Ultra HD content (be it movies, photos or textures for PC games) manageable. A PCI Express drive may not be in your immediate future, but the technology will be hard to avoid within a few years, taking hard drives to an entirely new level of performance.

Image Credit: Jona via Wikimedia

Editors' Recommendations

Matthew S. Smith
Matthew S. Smith is the former Lead Editor, Reviews at Digital Trends. He previously guided the Products Team, which dives…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more