Skip to main content

Pimax 8K X hands-on review: Long-awaited 8K VR headset is here, and it’s awesome

VR enthusiasts sat up and took notice when Pimax opened a Kickstarter for its 8K headset in October of 2017. The reason is exactly what you’d suspect. With 8K resolution, Pimax’s promised headset offered a new standard for VR clarity. Nearly six thousand backers pledged over 4.2 million dollars and awaited its January 2018 delivery.

And waited. And waited. And waited. The initial goodwill earned by the company’s pie-in-the-sky aspirations faded as backers had to wait longer and longer for headsets to deliver.

The Pimax 8K X was selected by our editors as the best product in the AR/VR category at CES 2020. Check out more of our Top Tech of CES Award winners.
Best of CES 2020 AR/VR
CES 2020

Now, at CES 2020, the long-awaited 8K headset is here, and it has all the specs. The twin 4K displays are backed up by a 200 degree field-of-view that’s far more immersive than competitors. It also has built-in audio jacks to support headsets, compatibility with Steam VR and Oculus game (through Pimax software), and a refresh rate up to 90Hz.

Pimax 8K X VR headset
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Is it glorious? Oh, yes, it’s glorious. I’ve grown jaded to VR over the years, but the Pimax 8K X brought on the giddy smile from my first VR experiences. 8K is a drastic bump over competitors like the Valve Index which, for comparison, has two 1,440 x 1,600 screens.

The jump in clarity was obvious from the moment I put on the headset. Fine text is often difficult to read on competing headsets, and details can appear obscured or heavily aliased. Not so on the Pimax 8K X. The demo, a simple flight simulator loop, presented me with many small gauges to read. I had no problem making them out.

The Pimax has something most headsets lack; a real sense of peripheral vision.

It’s a huge leap from playing Elite Dangerous on the Oculus Rift DK1, where interface details were often headache-inducing to read. It’s a smaller leap over the Valve Index, but still noticeable.

The increased field of view is less impressive at first but, as I settled in, the benefit became more obvious. The Oculus Quest has a 90-degree field of view, while the Valve Index has a 130-degree field of view. The Pimax’s 200-degree field of view provides something those headsets lack; a real sense of peripheral vision. To me, it’s not a night-and-day difference, but it does lead to a more natural, less claustrophobic experience.

8K resolution is awesome, but there’s a problem. Performance. You’re going to need an extremely powerful system. The company recommends a Nvidia RTX 2080 for full 8K mode. To take off the edge, the headset offers Dual Engine Mode, which can lower the render resolution to 2,560 x 1,440 per display and then upscale that to 4K. Upscale Mode is the only way to achieve the maximum 90Hz refresh rate (8K runs at 75Hz) and reduces the recommended graphics card to Nvidia’s RTX 2060.

Pimax 8K X VR headset
Pimax 8K X VR headset Image used with permission by copyright holder

No one will call the Pimax 8K X sleek. Its broad, angular design is required to make a 200-degree field of view possible. I worried the bulk would be annoying, but I had no problem once I slipped it on. The well-padded headset stayed in place. I felt its weight, but about equal to a Vive Pro. My hands-on time was limited, however, so I can’t say it’ll remain comfortable over long sessions.

The Pimax 8K X retails for $1,299. There’s also a bundle with Valve Index controllers and base stations for the oddly specific price of $1,828. That’s a lot of money for a VR headset. Yet it’s not as much as I’d expect given the Pimax’s wildly impressive hardware. If you want to be on the cutting edge of home VR, the Pimax 8K X is where it’s at.

Editors' Recommendations

Matthew S. Smith
Matthew S. Smith is the former Lead Editor, Reviews at Digital Trends. He previously guided the Products Team, which dives…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more