Samuel Weiser and four collaborators from the Graz University of Technology in Austria have published research that demonstrates how SGX can be used to conceal a piece of malware. Within minutes, this technique was used to gain access to RSA keys hidden in SGX enclaves, according to a report from The Register.
The researchers developed a method of monitoring vulnerable cache sets that allowed them to spot the telltale signature of an RSA key calculation. “Key recovery comes in three steps,” reads the paper. “First, traces are preprocessed. Second, a partial key is extracted from each trace. Third, the partial keys are merged to recover the private key.”
Tests were run on an SGX-capable Lenovo ThinkPad T460S, which was running Ubuntu version 16.10. The team found that a single cache trace offered access to 96 percent of a 4,096-bit RSA key, and it only took eleven traces for the complete key to be assembled. The process took less than five minutes.
The authors of the paper said it’s possible to block the type of attack that they’ve demonstrated. However, the responsibility of addressing the vulnerability falls to Intel, as changes made to operating systems could end up causing further damage to the SGX model.
This isn’t the first time that Weiser has gone public with evidence that SGX is vulnerable. In January 2017, he was part of a group of researchers that published a paper that demonstrated how its input-output protections could be abused to gain access to private user data.
Digital Trends was given the following statement by Intel:
There have been many academic articles looking at the security of SGX, including side-channel attacks. In general these papers do not demonstrate anything new or unexpected about the Intel SGX architecture.
Preventing side channel attacks is a matter for the enclave developer. Intel makes this clear In the security objectives for SGX, which are well documented. The types of side-channel attacks identified on the RSA implementation used in the Graz paper were well-known for some time and are addressed by other crypto libraries available to developers (e.g. OpenSSL).
Editors' Recommendations
- Intel reveals full Arc Alchemist pricing, and it’s definitely competitive
- Intel XeSS is already disappointing, but there’s still hope
- Intel says Moore’s Law is alive and well. Nvidia says it’s dead. Which is right?
- Intel just accidentally leaked a mysterious 34-core CPU
- Intel Arc Alchemist: specs, pricing, release date, performance
